|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:06 PM Original message |
Bill Clinton for SCOTUS. What do you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. I like it, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Only for 5 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. would a 40-45 year old liberal survive confirmation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 01:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. I think a Supreme Court seat is too high-profile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. You don't need a law degree to be a Supreme court Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Clinton has a law degree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. There are no requisite qualifications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsstranger (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Clinton on the SCOTUS??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Clinton is disbarred, so he's out. Let's try Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. one doesn't have to even be a lawyer to be on the supreme court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Momgonepostal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. have we ever appointed anyone who... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Earl Warren n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DieboldMustDie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Oliver Wendell Holmes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:19 PM Original message |
I'm thinking Al Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. A HELL of a great Idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
12. Put Hillary on the SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stinkeefresh (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
13. Nah, SCOTUS is supposed to be a quiet position- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. It would be lunacy, even had he not been disbarred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
15. Get real... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eeyore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. I think that wingnut is dreaming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
19. Wasn't Clinton also forbidden from arguing in front of SCOTUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. I Think Hillary Has the Judicial Temperament |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. Edwards would make a much better Justice ~ He's young and able |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swinney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-10-04 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
23. Only with overwhelming D Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC