Errors Are Seen in Early Attacks on Iraqi Leaders

[shraby]

WASHINGTON, June 12 — The United States launched many more failed airstrikes on a far broader array of senior Iraqi leaders during the early days of the war last year than has previously been acknowledged, and some caused significant civilian casualties, according to senior military and intelligence officials.

Only a few of the 50 airstrikes have been described in public. All were unsuccessful, and many, including the two well-known raids on Saddam Hussein and his sons, appear to have been undercut by poor intelligence, current and former government officials said.

The strikes, carried out against so-called high-value targets during a one-month period that began on March 19, 2003, used precision-guided munitions against at least 13 Iraqi leaders, including Gen. Izzat Ibrahim, Iraq's No. 2 official, the officials said.

General Ibrahim is still at large, along with at least one other top official who was a target of the failed raids. That official, Maj. Gen. Rafi Abd al-Latif Tilfah, the former head of the Directorate of General Security, and General Ibrahim are playing a leadership role in the anti-American insurgency, according to a briefing document prepared last month by the Defense Intelligence Agency.

(more)
<http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/international/middleeast/13SADD.html?hp>

[Scurrilous]

1. Wow...."Only a few of the 50 airstrikes have been described in public."

..."All were unsuccessful.."

Zero for Fifty? Now I'm shocked and awed!



Another link to same story:

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20040612174009990001

[jbfam4]

2. More bad intelligence

"At the Pentagon last October, Brig. Gen. Robert W. Cone of the Army, director of the military's Joint Center for Lessons Learned, acknowledged that the intelligence necessary to carry out attacks like these had not measured up to expectations."

All these people dead because the intelligence wasn't good. How sad.