Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter to UK Sunday Times: Baghdad 'far worse than we were told'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:10 AM
Original message
Letter to UK Sunday Times: Baghdad 'far worse than we were told'
"The people have been led into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Baghdad communiques are belated, insincere, incomplete. Things have been far worse than we have been told, our administration more bloody and inefficient than the public knows. It is a disgrace to our record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure. We are to-day not far from a disaster.

The sins of commission are those of the civil authorities who were given a free hand. They are controlled from no Department of State. They availed themselves of the necessary discretion of war-time to carry over their dangerous independence into times of peace. They contest every suggestion of real self- government sent them from home. A recent proclamation about autonomy circulated with unction from Baghdad was drafted and published out there in a hurry, to forestall a more liberal statement in preparation.

The Cabinet cannot disclaim all responsibility. They receive little more news than the public: they should have insisted on more, and better. They have sent draft after draft of reinforcements, without enquiry. When conditions became too bad to endure longer, they decided to send out the original author of the present system, with a conciliatory message to the Arabs that his heart and policy have completely changed.
...
We have not reached the limit of our military commitments. Four weeks ago the staff there drew up a memorandum asking for four more divisions. I believe it was forwarded to the Pentagon, which has now sent three brigades. If Afghanistan cannot be further denuded, where is the balance to come from? Meanwhile, our unfortunate troops, under hard conditions of climate and supply, are policing an immense area, paying dearly every day in lives for the wilfully wrong policy of the civil administration in Baghdad."

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/history/1920arabia.htm

T.E. Lawrence, August 22nd, 1920

OK, I changed, or left out, the odd word here and there (eg 'War Office'->Pentagon), but there is no change of meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Santayana was right.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC