Do you think that guys like Boortz & Rush have Sexual Inadequacies?

[mopaul]

sort of a fruedian thing you know, the constant public bloviating and chest pounding like lesser primates do. some boy monkeys like to make a spectacle of their erections when playing dominance games.
to see who has the biggest weenie, and they all have these little monkey weenies. are rush and boortz doing a similar thing?

trying desperately to show how tough they are rhetorically when you're not there to punch them in the face. tough talk, macho overkill, to compensate for a tiny physical attribute common to males homo sapiens. i'm a big tough republican with a lot of fans and a lot of power and influence and i'm very manly and i can call kerry a coward cause he's not here to punch me in the face.

i honestly think that neal boortz, tucker carlson, bob novak, bill o'reilley, shawn hannity, and all those other macho talking tough guys are really frightened little boys deep, deep down inside. the type of boys who's face you might force into a toilet in highschool cause their such pricks.

i'll just bet you that they are even, dare i say it, latent homosexuals who are so afraid to admit it that they have to get married and live a lie and constantly put on a macho john wayne mask to make up for their soft, vulnerable, pitiful, weasly, whimpy real selves. i'll bet the farm that boortz is a deeply conflicted homosexual man who lashes out at the whole world in self loathing. like hitler.

puny little neal boortz, pitiful fat sweaty lonely little rush. pitiful excuses for men.

[mountainvue]

1. Rush

probably can't get it up from the drug use and I picture Boortz as some kind of toe sucker ala Dick Morris.

[boxster]

2. Is this a trick question?

Of course they do.

[salinen]

3. My theory:

I consider myself typical, sexually. I experimented in my teens to find out which sex I liked. Only I have no regrets experimenting with other boys. But I am hopelessly hetero. Anyway, I think many boys experimented with other boys. Only, guys like Neil and Rush, are freaked out by what they did. So to over compensate, they try to act as supermachomen. Denial leads to insanity.

[NMDemDist2]

4. arg, couldn't even read the post

the headline/subject caused me to gag :puke:

so I come down squarely on the "who the hell gives a shit" side :)

[TheWizardOfMudd]

5. I recently heard Hannity . . . .

. . . make a very disparaging statement about sex. I don't remember what he said but the implication was that sex is not important or meaningful. It was weird.

[soggy]

12. rush acts manly?

rush makes richard simmons look manly. rush is ann coulter's little bitch.

[tnlefty]

6. Yes, and I honestly think that there are a lot more of them

And I think that because they are soooooo lousy with a female lover that they contribute to her not wanting to have sex often and it perpetuates a steroetype that women don't like sex and it gets their sorry asses off the hook.

How's that?

[seabeyond]

7. Sexual Inadequacies..........DUUUUUUUUUUUH

lol and a wink

[Hoping4Change]

8. Repukes that support them sure do. They are a bunch of

masochistic submissives seeking dominant masters whom they can worship, adore and obey. They're happy to be used as a**wipes and thrown away whilst their masters lead lives few Repukes can even dream of let alone attain.

[daa]

9. Boortz is a PENIS with ears nt

[mopaul]

11. i like it

a penis with ears. heh heh, i gotta tell that one to my mom

[Hubert Flottz]

10. They may be one ball men like:::::::::::::::::::::::

their fearless leader! Hitler!

[sofa king]

13. Isn't Hannity the guy who was fingered at a gay bar in NYC recently?

I don't know, I just heard the rumor that one of those hypercon chatterboxes on Fox was recently outed.

[qwertyMike]

14. All right wingers do

Look at the Fundies
Look at Ashcroft.
Bush was drunk for 20 years and not one sexual escapade worth reporting! (Lefties only drink to GET women :) )

All those preachers, the obsession with sex.
The gay thing.
Anti-porn crusaders.
Catholic church
Why do they hate Clinton? The SEX thing of course.

ad vomitum

[whistle]

15. Here is something that the neoconservative talking heads....

...can really become bothered about, cancer causing condoms!

Study Says Condoms Contain Cancer-Causing Substance Reuters Fri May 28, 2004,12:09 PM ET


BERLIN (Reuters) - Most condoms contain a cancer-causing chemical and their manufacture should be subject to greater quality control, a German scientific research institute said Friday.

The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute in Stuttgart, Germany, said it found the carcinogen N-Nitrosamine present in 29 of 32 types of condoms it tested in simulated conditions.

"N-Nitrosamine is one of the most carcinogenic substances," the study's authors said. "There is a pressing need for manufacturers to tackle this problem."

The carcinogen is thought to be present in a substance used to improve condom elasticity. When the rubber material comes in contact with human bodily fluids, it can release traces of N-Nitrosamine, the study said.

Local government officials said condom users should not stop using rubber contraceptives based on results of the study because N-Nitrosamine does not present an immediate health danger.

But Germany's Federal Institute for Risk Assessment said that daily condom use exposed users to N-Nitrosamine levels up to three times higher than levels naturally present in food.