Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate rejects ban on civilian interrogators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:41 PM
Original message
Senate rejects ban on civilian interrogators
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate rejected a proposal Wednesday to phase out interrogations by civilian contractors at Guantanamo Bay, in Afghanistan and in Iraq.

The proposal failed 54 to 43 mostly along party lines. But even opponents of the measure said too many civilians are involved in intelligence gathering.

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Connecticut, who put forward the amendment, said the Abu Ghraib prison scandal requires Senate action, and private contractors have no place interrogating prisoners.

"It's the 21st century, the war is on terrorism, let's wake up," Dodd said.

(more)
<http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/16/interrogations.vote/index.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. How are they going to give away tax payer money to corporations if they
start limiting the ways corporations can work for the government?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Republicans - United For Torture...
Nazi Rat Bastards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. republicans
the party where every one lines up to see who is less civilized than ghengis khan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROC Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't we do this one yesterday?
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 02:10 PM by ROC
If interrogation of EPWs is not an inherently government function, the function should be A-76ed. Contract provisions can be put in place to safeguard. Put the troops out doing strictly military functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC