Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boycott Exxon and Buy Shell!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:14 PM
Original message
Boycott Exxon and Buy Shell!!!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4949299-103690,00.html

I say we BOYCOTT EXXON/MOBIL and BUY SHELL!!!

This is a dramatic admission and a great opportunity for progressive action. I, for one, will pledge to buy shell instead of Exxon wherever and whenever possible.




Oil chief: my fears for planet
Shell boss's 'confession' shocks industry

http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4949299-103690,00.html

David Adam, science correspondent
Thursday June 17, 2004

The Guardian

The head of one of the world's biggest oil companies has admitted that the threat of climate change makes him "really very worried for the planet". In an interview in today's Guardian Life section, Ron Oxburgh, chairman of Shell, says we urgently need to capture emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, which scientists think contribute to global warming, and store them underground - a technique called carbon sequestration.

"Sequestration is difficult, but if we don't have sequestration then I see very little hope for the world," said Lord Oxburgh. "No one can be comfortable at the prospect of continuing to pump out the amounts of carbon dioxide that we are pumping out at present ... with consequences that we really can't predict but are probably not good."

His comments will enrage many in the oil industry, which is targeted by climate change campaigners because the use of its products spews out huge quantities of carbon dioxide, most visibly from vehicle exhausts. His words follow those of the government's chief science adviser, David King, who said in January that climate change posed a bigger threat to the world than terrorism.

....



Mr Oakley said a gulf was opening between more progressive oil companies such as Shell, which invests in alternative energy sources including wind and solar power, and ExxonMobil, the biggest and most influential producer, particularly in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
charlie105 Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another reason: Shell advertises on Air America Radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Really??? I'll be damned. Anyone want to take the pledge?
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 04:23 PM by seventhson
Boycott EXXON/MOBIL! BUY SHELL!!!

Who makes Bumper Stickers? I need one.

If we can make this have impact it can truly change the world (at least a little bit).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Why do they advertise on AAR? Because they're so awful, it's the only way
they can redeem themselves.

Nigeria, anyone?

Ogoniland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the info!!
I will buy Shell from now on, and absolutely boycott ExxonMobil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I always buy Shell
or Citgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Haven't bought a drop of gas from Exxon since Valdez spill
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 04:22 PM by Submariner
in 1989. I would hope many DU'ers would always boycott the Exxon oilpigs. Better late than never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Please, do call and inform Shell why you're switching
Ways to contact them can be found here.

It's Citgo and Shell for me now. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Question
British Petroleum has been running commercials touting their 'Beyond Petroleum' New Agey save-the-world oil company attitude.

I wonder if this Shell guy is either bandwagoneering, or trying to undercut BP? This article soulds an awful lot like an ad for Shell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. If you want to know why they're doing this, go see The Corporation.
Shell started trying to reform their public image after Ken Sarowiwa was excuted. Rumor is, it was done for Shell -- the government let Shell call it off at the last minute, and Shell said go ahead. They got a little more blowback from that than they expected.

But they still engage in terrible business practices, and they still will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fear Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shell + Hydrogen
And don't forget about transforming Iceland into a totally run country on Hydrogen.


http://www.geothermie.de/egec-geothernet/basic/2003_05_06first_shell.htm
http://www.shell.is/category.aspx?catID=275
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Boycott Shell too. There's a great part of the doc "The Corporation"
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 04:51 PM by AP
talking to and about the last CEO of Shell, and they talk about how the corporation puts on a public facade of contrition to make consumers feel like they're trying to be good, but they keep up with all the awful shit they do anyway.

This thread is a perfect example of people being suckers for that.

Until Shell stops fucking up Nigeria, I will never buy from Shell, no matter what public facade they put up.

Buy Citgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fear Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. ok ok ok, you're right
problem is, they are all dirty as hell :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not Citgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fear Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. any links to back that up?
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 04:59 PM by Fear
How's the money stream / oil stream running with them?
Doing searches on Citgo I end up coming across BUSH and Citgo ?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Venezuela’s CITGO Contributes to Social Programs ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GernBlanston Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. BP
I haven't given Exxon one red cent in 15 years, and if I can help it, I never will.

BP is the only major oil co. I've found that is genuinely doing anything about researching renewable energy sources (one of thier research facilities on I-70 near Frederick, MD is operating on solar power). Of course, they're still an oil mega-corp, and I'm sure they do things we wish they didn't... but today in America, we have almost no choice but to consume gas, and we have to buy it from somewhere.

Just not Exxon.

btw... what is "The Corporation"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. perhaps you should weigh in on this thread . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. BP's concern for the environment isn't much deeper than changing its logo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. maybe it's a good idea in principle
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 04:53 PM by treepig
but in reality, it's a myth (leaving aside shell's atrocities in nigeria)

as debunked by snopes time and again:

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/nogas.htm


Statistics aside, the glaring fallacy here is the suggestion that we could possibly buy our gasoline only from these selected companies. This notion is like claiming that we could put the big grocery chains out of business if we all bought our food only from small mom & pop stores, but ignoring the fact that these small shops couldn't possibly come close to supplying all our grocery needs. The oil companies named above are relatively small (which is a large part of the reason why they don't necessarily import from the Middle East) and could not satisfy the demand that would be created if a significant portion of the USA's consumer base were to shun all the largest oil companies, unless they bought up the output of the companies we were supposed to be avoiding in the first place (or, alternatively, unless they raised their prices sky-high).

Moreover, the idea that oil companies sell gasoline only through their branded service stations -- and therefore if you don't buy gasoline from Shell-branded gas stations you're not sending money to Shell (or, by extension, the Middle East) -- is wrong. Oil companies sell their output through a variety of outlets other than their branded stations; as well, by the time crude oil gets from the ground into our gasoline tanks, there's no telling exactly where it came from. (A good deal of the crude oil purchased from Russia, for example, is oil from Iraqi fields sold through Russian middlemen.)


Complex problems rarely lend themselves to simple, painless answers. Simply shifting where we buy gasoline isn't nearly as good a solution as the much tougher choice of sharply curtailing the amount of gasoline we buy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Which gas brand does my gas station use?
I go to Holiday or Kwik-Trip. Sometimes Amoco, though I think they use Exxon-Mobil? :shrug:

I will happily support Shell in light of this.

Thanks MUCH for posting!!

:yourock:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC