Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My final theory about the Josh Marshall story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 05:39 AM
Original message
My final theory about the Josh Marshall story
It's the origin of the forged Niger/Uranium papers. I recall Josh Marshall mentioning some time ago that this was being investigated but no-one has mentioned anything about that since then.

I recall Sy Hersh writing that he suspected some pissed-off ex CIA agents had created the forged documents to embarrass the Bush administration.

I never fully believed that and always had the nagging suspicion that the papers were created by people in the administration, most likely in Cheney's office.

Mark my words - this is the story and if JM and others can prove it, "tectonic" is an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. it had been mentioned that the papers were forged
and it was blamed on italian sources

tighting down my :tinfoilhat: : so if these papers were originally forged by pissed-off ex CIA agents and if the italian connection is true -- does this mean the ex CIA agents gave them to the italians, who in turn gave them back to unsuspecting US intelligence agents?

:nuke: I think my :tinfoilhat: just exploded.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. As a hypothesis, these days...
... it's not so far-fetched. There was a single source article (and the story promptly died) that the claim that Iraq could have WMDs deployed in 45-minutes came from the US, even though the administration said in Sept. 2002 that the information came from British intelligence.

If one thinks about the time frame of that story, in the context of what is now known about Allawi (that he was the source for that completely false allegation), and then think back on when Allawi divorced himself from MI6 and began to work for the CIA, then it becomes obvious that Allawi was a CIA asset well before the 45-minute charge became public.

So, from whence did the information come? The UK, or the US?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Could the forged "yellowcake" document
Edited on Sun Jun-20-04 06:08 AM by JellyBean1
have originated in the energy task force meeting in February 01?

Is this the classified information that Cheney is trying to keep hidden and is before the SCOTUS now?

If the Cheney energy committee forged the document, then this means the administration had plans for Iraq's oil long before 911. The war in Iraq would have never been allowed, even with the forged "yellowcake" document, unless the "Pearl Harbor" event occurred.

Conspiracy to commit treason is more than just an impeachable offense, it can mean death.

Edit:clairity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Isn't the SCOTUS supposed to rule on the Cheney energy papers?
That case has been argued. These rulings tend to emerge during the Spring/Summer recess.

If the SCOTUS rules that the Cheney Energy Task Force reveal its collaborators and documents to the fact then this would be a tectonic shift in the Washington power structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. A ruling from SCOTUS is due this month. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. well that, and
Edited on Sun Jun-20-04 11:34 AM by newsguyatl
the fact that cheney and his energy pals were dividing up oil fields in iraq back in 01 at that meeting... i think that's pretty good proof, too.


i would have taken scalia on a fishing trip, too, if i were dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Bingo! You hit the one death penalty "yes" position I have
being the agent of thousands of deaths does it for me. Hang the bastards (all of them) if this is ever the scenario that lead to that document which started a war where thousands of innocents are dead or maimed.

For those who like their "treason" to be distinctly "American" in origin AND in casualties: nearly 1000 dead Americans should do it for you.

Seriously, in the case of falsifying information with the intent to create a war---hang the bastards. Hang them publicly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Or it could be THIS!!
Cheney in firing line over Nigerian bribery claims

Antony Barnett and Martin Bright
Sunday June 20, 2004
The Observer


A British lawyer is emerging as a key witness in a $180 million bribery investigation that could lead to the indictment of US vice president Dick Cheney.

Last week, US oil corporation Halliburton cut all ties with a former senior executive, Albert Stanley, after it emerged he had received as much as $5m in 'improper personal benefits' as part of a $4bn gas project in Nigeria. Halliburton also sacked a second 'consultant', William Chaudan in connection with the bribery allegations. At the time of these alleged payments, Cheney was chief executive of the corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Interesting that the uranium docs were forged in Nigeria
always wondered if there was some connection?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Niger and Nigeria are separate countries
neighboring, but distinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Yeah, I figure it was the combination of the U.S. indictments and the
Edited on Sun Jun-20-04 12:02 PM by merh
French indictments. They have been after Cheney for quite some time and the "freedom fries" and boycots wasn't going to stop their investigation, despite what the world according to Bushco thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. I've always wondered if the Hallyburton Niger scandal
was somehow related to the doc forgeries in Nigeria? Just askin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. and where is Josh, anyway?
Maybe he's not relaxing. Maybe he's doing some footwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. so who ISN'T in a jam...
cheney
rumsfeld
ashcroft
bush
bushBud Lay

am I missing some - must be tons more? These guys must be having some sleepless nights lately...

Hang on tight, I can smell 'red alert' coming up realllll soon. There will be an attack on the US mainland putting wtc at a distant second in death and mayhem - the attack will be most likely be bio - blamed on Saudi Arabia - navy ships are already positioned - ka boom. Military state.

This can all happen in a matter of hours...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Nah, they all sleep fine
http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/texts/03110700.htm

Question: So do you use sleeping tablets to organize yourself?

Secretary Powell: Yes. Well, I wouldn't call them that. They're a wonderful medication -- not medication. How would you call it? They're called ambien, which is very good. You don't use ambien? Everybody here uses ambien.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes, this is my analysis, too.
This could get VERY MESSY VERY QUICKLY. There is a COVERT WAR going on right now within the halls of power of both US intelligence and military. The BUSH forces have the ability to MIHOP any number of scenarios which would immediately distract public attention from what is actually going on. Opposing forces know this and therefore have to act with extraordinary care, yet swiftly.

My :tinfoilhat: says WATCH OUT: The Bushistas may pull a stunt approximately 100 times that of 9/11 (think 300,000 dead). The outcome will be panic and martial law. This, however, will not get their asses out of the fire and might, in fact, set them up to be eliminated by the opposition. Think military couter-coup.

Yes, I'm paranoid, but I've been watching this situation for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC