The National Lawyers Guild calls for the prosecution of President George

[the ether]

The National Lawyers Guild calls for the prosecution of President George W. Bush with a "command responsibility" theory of liability under the War Crimes Act. Bush can be prosecuted under the War Crimes Act or the Torture Statute, if he knew or should have known about the U.S. military's use of torture and failed to stop or prevent it. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Michael Avery, President, 617-573-8551

Heidi Boghosian, Executive Director, 212-679-5100, ext. 11

NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD CALLS FOR PROSECUTION OF PRESIDENT BUSH FOR ROLE IN
TORTURE

2003 State of the Union Address Contained Implicit Admission

New York, June 18, 2004--The National Lawyers Guild calls for the
prosecution of President George W. Bush with a "command responsibility"
theory of liability under the War Crimes Act. Bush can be prosecuted under
the War Crimes Act or the Torture Statute, if he knew or should have known
about the U.S. military's use of torture and failed to stop or prevent it.
A comment in the President's January 2003 State of the Union Address
contained an implicit admission by Bush that he had sanctioned the summary
execution of many when he said: "All told, more than 3,000 suspected
terrorists have been arrested in many countries, and many others have met a
different fate." "Let's put it this way," he continued, "they are no longer
a problem for the United States and our friends and allies."

The Defense Department and the Justice Department each commissioned
documents attempting to justify the use of torture under the President's
war-making power, notwithstanding the Constitution's clear mandate that
only Congress can make the laws. The Defense Department memo said that as
commander-in-chief, the President has a "constitutionally superior
position" to Congress. This blatant disregard for the tripartite Separation
of Powers doctrine is also contrary to the landmark ruling in the Korean
War case, Youngstown Sheet & Tire Co. v. Sawyers, in which the Supreme
Court held, "In the framework of our Constitution, the President's power to
see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be
a lawmaker."

The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment was ratified by the United States and is thus part
of the supreme law of the land. Congress implemented U.S. obligations under
this treaty by enacting the Torture Statute, which provides 20 years, life
in prison, or even the death penalty if death results from torture
committed by a U.S. citizen abroad. The USA PATRIOT Act added the crime of
conspiracy to commit torture to the Torture Statute. The Convention Against
Torture prohibits the intentional infliction of severe physical or mental
pain or suffering on a person to (a) obtain a confession, (b) punish him or
(c) intimidate or coerce him based on discrimination of any kind. To
violate this treaty, the pain or suffering must be inflicted "by or at the
instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or
other person acting in an official capacity."

The Istanbul Protocol of 9 August 1999 is the Manual on the Effective
Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment. It sets forth international guidelines
for the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights. Included in the
Protocol's list of torture methods are rape, blunt trauma, forced
positioning, asphyxiation, crush injuries, humiliations, death threats,
forced engagement in practices violative of religion, and threat of attacks
by dogs. The photographs and reports from prisoners in Abu Ghraib include
all of these techniques. Moreover, the Defense Department analysis
maintained that a torturer could get off it he acted in "good faith," not
thinking his actions would result in severe mental harm. If the torturer
based his conduct on the advice of these memos, he could according to this
argument, have acted in good faith.

Referring to the 9/11 Commission's preliminary reports issued this week,
National Lawyers Guild President Michael Avery said: "The Justice
Department memorandum reads like a pre-trial brief on behalf of the Nazi
defendants in the Nuremberg trial. It's rife with justification after
justification for the use of torture."

Bush implicitly admitted sanctioning willful killing, torture and/or
inhuman treatment in his 2003 State of the Union Address. The Constitution
mandates the impeachment of a President for high crimes and misdemeanors.
There is no higher crime than a war crime. Willful killing, torture and
inhuman treatment constitute grave breaches of the Geneva Convention, which
are considered war crimes under The War Crimes Act of 1996.

The National Lawyers Guild, founded in 1937, comprises over 6,000 members
and activists in the service of the people. Its national office is
headquartered in New York and it has chapters in nearly every state, as
well as over 100 law school chapters. Guild members provide legal support
to progressive demonstrations throughout the country, and well understand
the nationwide trend toward increasingly repressive measures deployed
against political protesters.

[freetobegay]

1. Is there a link to this?

[Wonk]

4. I don't see any mention of it on their website

though they do have a link on their home page to this related article written by Marjorie Cohn (executive vice president of the National Lawyers Guild) which was published on truthout a week ago.

http://www.nlg.org/news/articles/cohn_warcrimes.htm

(snip)

Policymakers must be held accountable. All those in the chain of command should be investigated, and war crimes prosecutions initiated of the responsible military and civilian personnel.

Donald Rumsfeld should not only be relieved of his duties as Secretary of Defense. He must also be investigated for war crimes.

[Wonk]

5. I found a link for it with google

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0406/S00217.htm

[freetobegay]

9. Thanks wonk for finding a link.

[anarchy1999]

13. Found the one I was looking for!!!!!!!!!

http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2004/06/16_congressletter.php

Harvard Law Professors Urge Congress to Review Interrogation Policy and Hold Executive Branch Accountable


Post Date: June 16, 2004

A group of more than 450 professors of law, international relations, and public policy--led by Harvard Law School faculty members--today sent a letter calling on Congress to hold accountable, through impeachment and removal if appropriate, civilian officials from the top of the Executive Branch on down for policies developed at high levels that have facilitated the recent abuses at Abu Ghraib. The letter also calls on Congress to take primary responsibility for any policy on coercive interrogation employed by the United States.
In asking Congress to assess Executive Branch accountability, the letter says: "a growing body of evidence indicates that the abuses practiced on detainees under American control are the consequence of policies developed at the highest levels in the months and years immediately preceding the scandal." It argues that prosecution of lower level personnel "while necessary, is clearly insufficient."
In asking Congress to take responsibility for reviewing coercive interrogation policies and practices, the letter notes that "official U.S. policy now involves use of coercive methods that are morally questionable and that may violate international and domestic law." It further states: "....any decision to adopt a coercive interrogation policy and the definition of any such policy, if adopted, should be made within the strict confines of a democratic process.... asic principles and policies regarding human rights must be defined by a representative and accountable body acting in transparent and deliberative fashion."
Elizabeth Bartholet, one of the Harvard Law professors organizing the letter effort, stated: "The letter arose out of our concern that some of the most fundamental issues raised by these abuses were getting lost in the debate. The use of torture and related extreme coercive techniques goes to the heart of our understanding of our nation, its culture and values. If we take seriously our democratic system, any decision to use such techniques must be made by Congress as the representative body, rather than by Executive Branch officials working in secrecy."

Lots more......

[BeFree]

2. Well, well, well

Like I always said: Give 'em enough rope and they'll hang themselves.

National Lawyers Guild, eh? Good on them. If I had a spare buck they'd be getting it, but I doubt they need it anyway.

Don't you especially like the part about how the Patriot Act can be used to make the rope a little tighter?

[union_maid]

6. I don't have it either, but they probably could use it

The National Lawyers Guild is not made up of lawyers who make a lot of money. It's leftist and they're probably mostly doing public interest and civil rights work.

[NJCher]

3. didn't this guild also call for some type of prosecution

after the stolen election?

Whatever happened to that?


Cher

[Catherine Vincent]

7. I'll bet the Wall Street Journal won't report that in their paper.

Fucking assholes.

[SupportRapeVictims]

12. I bet they will to show lawyers as far left. Thus, we need tort reform.

As if these two have anything in common.

Politics, it's a double-edged sword.

[seemslikeadream]

8. Send them to the Hague!

[Karenina]

10. Kick!

:kick:

[Disturbed]

11. Finally!!!

I hope that this group can persuade many others to join this suit, esp. Dems in Congress. The Constitution of the USA, The Bill of
Rights and The Declaration of Independence must be defended.

Rumsfailed admitted in public today that he is guilty of violations of many laws, incl. those of the Geneva Convention and theCIA Dir. Tenet is guilty, as well. Why is the DOJ not indicting them now?