Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow! Just saw the anti-Clinton ad on Vanity, very nasty...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kaiso Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 08:55 PM
Original message
Wow! Just saw the anti-Clinton ad on Vanity, very nasty...
They blame Clinton for every terrorist from the first World Trade Center bombing to the Cole claiming he did nothing.

What upset me is last night on 60 mins, Clinton listed not getting OBL as one of his regrets, my beef is when he went after OBL, the right charged Clinton with a Dog Wagging Its Tail scenario. Why doesn't Clinton say this fact during interviews?

The end of the Ad shows a picture of Clinton's book with the words "My Life Bill Clinton" changed in blood red to "My Fault Bill Clinton", sending a disturbing message that could be read that 9/11 and all the hell in America today was Clinton's fault.

This was a 3rd party Ad, not openly endorsed by Shrub but I am sure they are rejoicing they have other groups to do their dirty work.

I was stunned and shocked after watching this Ad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. who is running...
... against Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Preeeeeeecisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is exactly the message they are sending... it is so sick! They
will get him with lies and persecution any time they can... and that exonerates Bush of 9/11?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. This is a good thing..the persecution will cinch the credibility of THOP
The reefers are in total meltdown..

They are in fear biting mode..
biting anything that moves.

Kerry is a lucky man..wait,
smart and lucky man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait until F-911 comes out...we'll see who's squealing like a pig then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think it's hilarious
Running Anti-Clinton Ads. That has to be the most desperate attempt to salvage Bush's regime yet. Who's idea was this? Rove? Only 4 more days till F911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. The majority of Americans loved Clinton
This ad will backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. LOL!!!!Clinton's still running, eh?.......Neocons just can't get enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Richard Clarke has stated that 1) bombing the chemcal plant was
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 09:28 PM by Hoping4Change
based on factual evidence and 2)the FBI had not pinned the Cole bombing on AQ until Bush was installed. The blame for not revenging the Cole lays at Bush's rotten feet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. OBL is Bush!!!......And you're right OBL's head should have been handed
at Poppy Bush's doorstep..........Mafia style!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Vanity what? Fair? Sorry so out of loop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just another sideswiping sucker punch from the RW cowards
They know Clinton will be supporting kerry. Just a silly tactic to remind people of how "immoral" Democrats are.

It's times like these I'm soooo glad I don't watch television. I always hated election years on the tube, and this promises to be a total pukefest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. You just gotta know that
the party of Bush must know he's in HUGE trouble if they have to resort to bashing Clinton. I think this is a good sign imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. So is this ad actually running?
I watched the interview and I didn't see that ad...

It was only meant to be run during the interview, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. What a mindless waste of money...
Maybe a left-leaning group should do an ad critical of Gerald Ford.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well then, Flackman is born...
See Al- if you had Clinton by your side, he would have been your own personal shock absorber...Lieberman was so much

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. So WHO was in charge when Bin Laden became NUMBER ONE?
Bin Laden Steps Up to No. 1

The explosion was so powerful it was heard several miles away, and its reverberations would eventually travel around the globe. The car was nearing its destination, the al-Falah Mosque in the Pakistani frontier city of Peshawar, when it hit the land mine. All four passengers in the vehicle—a father with his two young sons and another youth—were killed. Chief among the dead that Friday was Sheik Abdullah Azzam, 48. It was the second attempt on his life. Earlier in 1989 a bomb was planted beneath the pulpit of a mosque where he was supposed to preach and pray, but the bomb did not explode. Azzam, a Palestinian, was the most prominent advocate of a jihad to save the Muslim lands from infidel encroachment. Thanks in part to his writings and diatribes, Islamic fighters from around the world traveled to Afghanistan to defeat the Soviet Union.

Azzam's killers have never been identified. But the man who gained the most from his demise was his deputy, Osama bin Laden, who took over the role of first among the jihadis. The Saudi aristocrat had been the chief financier of Azzam's organization and a devoted follower since the early 1980s, when he came under Azzam's influence while studying at Jeddah University. Disagreement between master and protege over the shape of a post-Soviet Afghanistan led to a parting of ways in early 1989, and soon bin Laden went off to found al-Qaeda. With Azzam dead, bin Laden assumed ideological seniority in the movement. He would expand the struggle from Muslim territory deep into the heart of the West itself.

NOTE THE YEAR - 11/24/1989

http://www.time.com/time/80days/891124.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaiso Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. Just saw another clip on CNN, they used background footage of Ground Zero
At least that's what it appeared to be. These freaks are amazingly sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hmmmmmmm, gosh...
I was under the impression that after having served two terms as President Clinton couldn't run for another. Clinton must be running though otherwise why would the repuke RW take out ads against a man who wasn't running for anything, unless they are just plain stupid or delusional. :shrug: :freak: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. Any idea who is running these ads
and/or paying for them? It would be interesting to know who is behind this crap and to find out what ghosts they might have in their closets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. An ad as sick as that can only backfire on them
I think the majority of Americans would find it horribly distasteful and over the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Big Dog's running again?????????? He has my vote!
g
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC