Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tit for Tat, what RW nuts said abour Kerry's cursing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:53 PM
Original message
Tit for Tat, what RW nuts said abour Kerry's cursing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. write to prager and demand he criticize cheney as harshly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know what really pisses me off about that first article?
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 09:02 PM by YANG
Fuck isn't an anagram, that is an urban legend. Fuck is an archaic Viking word.

Idiot!

http://www.wordorigins.org/

Fuck
Popular etymologies agree, unfortunately incorrectly, that this is an acronym meaning either Fornication Under Consent of the King or For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge, the latter usually accompanying a story about how medieval prisoners were forced to wear this word on their clothing.

Deriving the etymology of this word is difficult, as it has been under a taboo for most of its existence and citations are rare. The earliest known use, according to American Heritage and Lighter, predates 1500 and is from a poem written in a mix of Latin and English and entitled Flen flyys. The relevant line reads:

Non sunt in celi quia fuccant uuiuys of heli.
Translated:

They are not in heaven because they fuck the wives of Ely .
Fuccant is a pseudo-Latin word and in the original it is written in cipher to further disguise it.

Some sources cite an alleged use from 1278 as a personal name, John le Fucker, but this citation is questionable. No one has properly identified the document this name supposedly appears in and even if it is real, the name is likely a variant of fuker, a maker of cloth, fulcher, a soldier, or another similar word.

The earliest usage cite in the OED2 dates from 1503 and is in the form fukkit. The earliest cite of the current spelling is from 1535.

While these cognates exist, they are probably not the source of fuck, rather all these words probably come from a common root. Most of the early known usages of the English word come from Scotland, leading some scholars to believe that the word comes from Scandinavian sources. Others disagree, believing that the number of northern citations reflects that the taboo was weaker in Scotland and the north, resulting in more surviving usages. The fact that there are citations, albeit fewer of them, from southern England dating from the same period seems to bear out this latter theory.

<\i>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. prager's email addy
dennisprager@dennisprager.com

if you want to inquire about his 'why democrats use the f-word" column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can't wait to listen to Prager tommorow
To see if he has anything to say.. the ass :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I thought it would interesting to see what
their reaction is. Keep those links, they may come in handy, especially for those of you that ever call cspan or any radio shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alvis Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't forget El Drugbo
He spent a lot of time on John Kerry's accurate description of the war in Iraq in the Rolling Stone interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC