Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looking back over the past three and a half years, I am

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Veggie Meathead Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 09:25 AM
Original message
Looking back over the past three and a half years, I am
beginning to form a rationale for the Bush administration's methods in its dealings with the Arab world.I THINK THE MAIN THRUST OF THEIR POLICY IS TO CONVINCE THE ARABS/MUSLIMS THAT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION IS NOT BOUND BY THE LAWS OF EITHER THE UNITED STATES OR INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND THEY WILL DO WHATEVER THEY PLEASE WHEN IT COMES TO ARABS OR MUSLIMS.This policy is exactly a mirror image of Ariel Sharon's policy in his dealings with the Palestinians.He may very well have convinced Bush of the need to violate all our laws in order to have an effective way to deal with the Arabs.Iraq was a perfect place to demonstrate this newfound Frontier Justice mode of the U.S. The confirmation of this view can be found in both Blair and Clinton's support for the policy.This entire group, Bush, Blair, Clinton,Sharon are convinced that the weakest link in the Western waays of dealing with Arabs/Muslims is to be found in our adherence to laws both internal and international, while the Arabs/Muslims conduct terrorist attacks by proxy against all infidel states like Israel, U.S. and India.

To convince the Arabs/Muslims that they are serious about implementing this policy, the Bush/Blair coalition has adopted a strategy of standing the Arabs' plans on their heads and used its own covert action teams to mount similar attacks and blame it on the Arabs.The War on Iraq must be seen as a Demonstration Project to show that the U.S. and Britain are willing to topple Arab governments and seize their oilfields if terror attacks don't cease.In fact, it was more effective for the U.S.to be seen as capable of lying to the UN Security Council in order to mount a preemptive war.

If my theory holds up there are many more corollaries that follow from these ideas.

I would like to see other DU'ers chip in with their opinions.Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, there appears to be four world governing entities...
Origianl U.S. rules, laws, and good will standards.
World and U.N. rules, laws, and good will treaties.
Other country rules, laws, and good will standards.

Then there is THE RULE OF PNAC, the Cabal, the Military-Corporate-Banking-Media-Fundamentalist Complex comprised mainly of certain people in the U.S. and England with significant input from Australia and Canada.

For PNACers and the last group:
Earth resources are their reason to be.
People are expendable, a nuisance, and must be controlled, contained and coverted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just look up PNAC or otherwise know as Project for New American Century.
Go have some fun and educate yourself and then share with as many as you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Please also check out...
http://www.geocities.com/bohemian_grove_dirt/

there are connections between PNAC and the Grove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC