Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any News Of Indictments?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 03:43 PM
Original message
Any News Of Indictments?
Isn't it about time for indictments to come out of some investigations? Aren't reports coming due from various investigative committees? I thought a bunch of potentially deadly news to the Administration were just around the corner. Anyone know more about them? What's coming and what the stakes are in it? Who's involved and how high does it go? What are the implications for the very top?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. not on a Saturday, if we didn't hear it on "news dump day" (Fri.)
we wont' hear it till next week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wayne Madsen says Plame indictments will be handed down
before the end of the month, which means next week. His soources say Bush and Cheney are in deep, and the investigation goes well beyond the outing of Valerie Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Kick!!! From your mouth and Madsen's rolodex to God's ear!
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 04:53 PM by calimary
And I just realized something about the "bush and cheney are in deep" part. bush CERTAINLY would be. Probably most likely the "lied about it" or "knew and did nothing to stop it" part of the indictment.

Why? Because he's a sadistic, petty, vindictive little shit.

How do we know this? We have a long track record to examine.

This is an individual who, as a youngster, enjoyed blowing up frogs with firecrackers.

This is someone who, under the influence of alcohol, drove his car into the garage wall in reaction to an unfavorable critique of one of his speeches - by his wife; challenged his own dad to a knock-down/drag-out (remember the "mano-a-mano" confrontation?); and snarled to Judy Woodruff, her husband Al Hunt, AND THEIR YOUNG SON, while they were at table as a family, in a public restaurant, something to the effect of "you son-of-a-bitch! I saw what you wrote. I'm not gonna forget it!"), and laughed like a hyena and mimicked, mockingly, when Karla Fay Tucker pleaded for her life from Death Row.

This from someone who, when it came time to announce the beginning of aggressions against Baghdad, pumped his fist in the air as though he'd just slam-dunked a basketball in the NBA finals.

He's a sadistic, petty, vindictive little shit. He gets off on the suffering of others. What other sort of individual would WANT to stick firecrackers into frogs and throw them in the air to watch them blow up - and for what other purpose? Seventh grade science fair? Of COURSE he knew. MAYBE he came up with the idea, himself. Or probably what's more likely is - he just issued a directive to "git" Wilson. Maybe he suggested semi-specifics like - get him. Hit him where it hurts. His wife, maybe. What's up with her? Anything we can use? Make him pay. Make him sorry he ever Messed with Texas! Show him who he's dealing with! As kkkarl rove would say - "fuck him like he's never been fucked." As dick cheney would say - "fuck yourself." (Actually, seems to me it would have been more like "go fuck yourself.")

And when they'd planted the bad seeds, he probably wanted to know how it "took," or wanted to know if the bastard had been "taken care of." "Hey, kkkarl, did you handle that - (pause, but they all knew what he was talking about) - you did? Good work, bro!" Might even have interjected "Whatdja do?" in between the "you did?" and the "Good work, bro!" Knowing his track record and his behavior in general, he would WANT to know what the results were, and if his intended victim was properly punished, and/or was now suffering. So he could enjoy it. And he would, indeed, have taken pleasure in the results.

THAT'S what he's about. He couldn't possibly NOT be involved, at least in some way, because he enjoys punishing his enemies just a little too much to stay out of the loop when another victim's been cornered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. About the only indictments were gonna' see have already been served.
Shit flows downhill, as they say. The bottom rung sadists at Abu-Ghraib are taking the hit for the bigshots.

About all we're going to see from the 911 comission is a lot of tsk,tsk, and some quiet resignations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC