Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader may be more of a factor than he looks today. Read why.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:23 PM
Original message
Nader may be more of a factor than he looks today. Read why.
Just saw another post about Nader being on the cover of "American Conservative" magazine. The article had him talking to Buchanan. Didn't give it much thought - just another example of Nader going off the deep end I thought... OR IS IT. Read that he seems to be going anti-immigration, again not to much thought about it. Then I read all these post about Lou Dobbs. Lou is very very anti-immigration. He says it would be a winning issue for a presidential candidate. Lou has given Nader friendly interviews in the past on his show. I think immigration or anti immigration is what we will be seeing from Nader. Buchanan Could help pull some of the right his way. And Nader's less than clear stand on social issues will not hurt him with this crowd. And he could swing right with out appearing to be pandering. Remember "I don't do 'gonad-al' politics"? Immigration is a big issue in North Carolina and South Carolina. I live near both states. Just today, I read about jobs leaving the Carolinas to go overseas. I would not count Nader out if this is the direction he plans to take. He could figure he is out of the picture with the left - and try to go for White working class voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe this will give a wake-up call to Kerry
Our exploding population growth brings a million plus market to lots of businesses. So many special interests benefit from it, that neither the GOP nor the Democratic Party is willing to publicly talk about the negative downsides that affect most Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah but it could also hurt Bush, many of the people that an anti- immgri
platform will appeal to have been voting Republican since Reagan, and may have supported Perot in 92 less so in 96. Nader - Buchanan? is not out of the question. The two are Friends, and Buchanan credits Nader with his changing position on economic issue. Both are pretty much on the same page as far as the Middle East goes.
Nader could claim Buchanan opened his eyes on social issues. And you would have a total appeal to the white working class on ALL ISSUES. Plus Nader will blunt some of Buchanan's negatives and vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalBushFan Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. uh oh
I don't know whether Dobbs refers to legal or illegal immigrants, but Dobbs is right... 83% of Americans think illegals should be deported. If Nader goes anti-immigration we're F***ED.
If a well-known conservative (not Nader) did the same thing, Bush would be screwed as well, though he'd be likely to counter by going anti-immigrant himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
As if anti-immigration is going to get more Kerry votes than Bush* votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm Wondering if the Result will be
that Nader pulls more from the Republicans than the Democrats. Despite cries of incredulity, I believe this is a possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That is not what I am claiming - read my post 3, this could hurt Bush
Very much. Most of these people have been voting Republican. but I think we would be a little surprised at the votes in Nov, if such a senario takes place. Anti immigration may not be cool in the PC liberal get togethers like this one, but that does not mean that some Democrats who are no fans of Bush will not take look at something like this.
As I have mentioned here berfore Buchanan is not exactly a Bush Republican, primaried poppy and ran in the reform party against JR.
Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FascistAdder Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. You know that is the second time...
I have heard something about NC today. I read an article today in the yahoo press releases that talks about allowing third parties to gamble so to speak on peoples life insurance policies in that state.

here is the link.

<http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=669&ncid=669&e=9&u=/usnw/20040628/pl_usnw/north_carolina_legislation_would_open_door_to_creation_of__death_pools__for_wealthy_investors__says_acli143_xml>

I don't know what exactly it means but I bet there is playing going on between this business of the summer catastrophe, nader, what is said about edwards, and so forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC