Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Bush Has Really Created With The So-Called "Iraqi Transfer Of Power"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beloved Citizen Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 06:58 PM
Original message
What Bush Has Really Created With The So-Called "Iraqi Transfer Of Power"
The lines are now drawn, and this is pretty much what it all boils down to: Can George W. Bush keep the members of the Interim Government alive until November 3rd?

The forces at work here:

- By singling The Interim Government out as the representatives of the "New Iraq," Bush has provided the insurgency with not only interesting targets, but a goal that will symbolize the success or failure of their rebellion.

- If Bush can manage to somehow keep these poor people alive, he will be able to declare that the move to democracy in Iraq a success, and that the war truly was fought for good and just reasons.

- If the insurgents manage to kill off several of the key members of this Interim Govt, the world will perceive that Bush has failed in his efforts to bring democracy to a troubled land.

In other words, the high stakes gamble of the Bush administration is to establish a totem government, then use the 140,000 American troops in Iraq to keep the members of this government alive against the wishes of a good number of the people they are supposed to be governing.

As is almost always the case when powerful superpowers involve themselves in the affairs of impoverished third world countries, the real concern is with the political perceptions and opinions of those living within the superpower itself. What actually happens to the supposedly liberated third world country is only a small and largely irrelevant sideshow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. maybe because he couldn't keep Saddam as a POW much
longer. Now Saddam is up for trial before a government appointed by the US under laws which have not yet been written. His connections to past US administrations can be buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC