|
Okay so we have the "Destroy Micheal Moores Character Tactic in effect", which is really not working on him since he was so polerizing in teh first place.
We also have the RW spin on the Bin LAdens/Saudi's leaving the country, the spin that Moore is making fun of teh Troops (totally false he actually puts a human face on teh Iraq war), etc...
What are they ignoring?
They do not dispute the very close relationship between the Saudi's and Bushco, they do not dispute ANY of these cozy business relationships that our brought out in the movie, which is one of the most damning inditment in the film. WHY? Becuase the Bush/Saudi relationship is ironclad, the more they talk about it, the more it brings this relationship out into the media at a time where Bushco has become weak.
They also don't defend the BUSH "compassiante conservative" MYTH, since everything in the movie is REAL film footage. Buush looks like a cocky-arrogant rich frat boy (kind of like Teddy in One Crazy Summer).
They only go after maybe 10% of the movie, condem it & call it propaganda, and use a minimal amount of bad and shaky evidence to back them up.
Look for what the wignuts are not critisizing about the movie, and this is what they are most scared about.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
