Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need a Laugh: Read These Insane O'Reilly Talking Points

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 11:59 AM
Original message
Need a Laugh: Read These Insane O'Reilly Talking Points

Here are 2 of the craziest insane talking points O'Dummy has ever spewed out of his right-wing ass. O'Dummy says Wes Clark lost the democratic nomination because he did not distance himself from Michael Moores comments about Bush being a deserter. That is insanity. And Bush was a deserter, he was AWOL for a year from his draft dodging fake National Guard duty. Moore was right and it has been proven.

He also says the far right has been quiet since Clinton left office, O'Dummy must be on drugs. All they talk about is Clinton, they talked about him for 2 years after he left office. They far right also blamed Clinton for every problem in America and the world for at least 3 years. They still do it to this day, yet O'Reilly thinks the far right has been quiet about Clinton.

What planet has he been living on, the far right has talked about Clinton non stop ever since he left office. I think O'Reilly is going insane and or he is senile and or he is both. His talking points get crazier every day, he really needs to get some mental help.

It is stunning how stupid O'Reilly is, if he actually believes that garbage he really needs some help.

--------

The Political Backlash is Coming...

Tuesday, June 29, 2004

By Bill O'Reilly

The political backlash is coming, that is the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo." You may remember that General Wesley Clark's presidential hopes were destroyed when he would not distance himself from Michael Moore's insane comment that President Bush was a deserter.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PETER JENNINGS, MODERATOR: At one point, Mr. Moore said in front of you that President Bush -- he was saying he'd like to see a debate between you, the general, and President Bush, who he called a deserter. Now, that's a reckless charge not supported by the facts. And I was curious to know why you didn't contradict him?

WESLEY CLARK, FMR. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Well, I think Michael Moore has the right to say whatever he feels about this. I don't know whether this is supported by the facts or not. I have never looked at it. I have seen this charge bandied about a lot, but to me it wasn't material.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

All right, now most Democrats in this country aren't crazed ideologues and realized that Clark lacked the perspective to be president.

Read the rest here:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124261,00.html

Now check this one out.

Legitimate Dissent or Hurting America?

Monday, June 28, 2004 - Talking Points
By Bill O'Reilly

Legitimate dissent or hurting America? That's the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo." Over the weekend, President Bush visited Ireland and Turkey. In both places, anti-American demonstrators turned out spouting the usual blather about the USA being bad, evil, dangerous, that kind of thing.

But let's examine the record and pinpoint just who those demonstrators really are. The United States removed a dictator who slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people. Is that a bad action? We attacked Saddam because he violated the Gulf War cease-fire and 17 United Nations resolutions. So, America had a perfect legal right to do what it did; thus, vis-a-vis Saddam, America did the right thing both morally and legally.

But the U.N. didn't help in the removal of Saddam because countries like France, Russia, and Germany were making billions of dollars dealing with the dictator. That's bad, isn't it? Allowing a killer to violate U.N. resolutions because you're profiting. Isn't that bad?

But no. Millions of people have come to the conclusion that's not bad. America's the problem, for eliminating a killer without approval from corrupt individuals. The issue gets foggier because the weapons of mass destruction that Saddam allegedly possessed have not shown up and the post-war situation has been mismanaged by the USA to some extent. The handover today may correct that situation, and all loyal Americans should pray it does.

The rest of his lies are here:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124123,00.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't this the same Bill O'Reilly who said . . .
that if no weapons of mass destruction were found, he'd apologize to the American people and never trust this administration again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. same guy
he's a lying piece of crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. I knew that, it was a VERY sarcastic question :). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yep.
And when called on that statement, he recinded it on the air. A long, long time after our Mission was Accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. You'd expect him NOT to lie like Himmler?
You must also beleiev the world is flat if you tough there was any chance a MONSTER like O'Reichley would behave anything like a Free Man or a (gag) "journalist".

That O'Reichley will always behave as his Nazi counterparts is a 100% given. The lies. The lies. The fabrications. The half-truths told to make the lies go down easier. The Orwellian Twisting of Language.

It is as it always was. And O'Reichley could do his job for Busheviks, Bolsheviks, Papa Doc, Ferdinand Marcos, Idi Amin or ANY Tyrant as well as he does now.

All he'd have to do is cange the names, pretty much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Himmler at least had the decency to pop the cyanide capsule in his gums.
Poor Bill will never admit to being wrong, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. he is not stupid
he is dishonest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handywork Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. O'Reilly is my own personal car accident...
I just cant seem to not watch his show...its so horrible and I cant stop yelling at it...my girlfriend has to leave the room...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. *lol* i loved the way you phrased that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is a Pub Whore who gets paid big bucks to say those things
OReally is a Demogogue of the Worst Degree. A Rush wannabee/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, Democrats, who turned Michael Moore's film into the top grossing
documentary of all time in just three days, breaking the old record it took nine months to achieve, who made Moore's film the third highest per-theater grossing film of all time, the highest grossing opening weekend of any film opening in under 1000 theaters, and the first documentary to top the box office, those same Democrats voted against Wesley Clark for siding WITH Michael Moore?

Another sad commentary on the Reagan public school system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can't pay any attention to FAUX news or the people that
work for this entertainment center. They have no creditability what-so-ever. The agenda faux pushes is obviously coming straight from the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronatchig Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. no clickin on fuxed links for me but
I do believe that the protesters were saying Bush is bad, evil, that sort of thing . second it is ILLegal to lie to congress about reasons to go to war. As for UN the resolutions the US could not get a resolutiion to enforce the resolution that Bush tried to hide his war crimes behind.

The poster who said that OReilly is a paid shill for the fascists . And should be prosecuted imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Violating UN sanctions Justified An Invasion?
So when do we invade Isreal?


Killing your own people justifies an invasion?


So when do we invade Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, China, Etc, etc?

O'really(?) is just taking the WH spin and putting new legs on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let's Say For a Moment, He's Correct
And Wes Clarke sacrificed his chance to be President because he refused to distance himself from Moore's AWOL claim.

When Bill O'Really is ready to put his own ass in a sling and risk his career by standing up for a possible truth against a popular lie, he just may be fit to shine Wes Clarke's shoes, but not until that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Clark lost for one main reason
He's not a very effective campaigner, despite being a first class human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JETS Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bill's last job was one where
he had to make deep, reflective opinions on the amount of makeup Madonna wears. Therefore, he has the qualifications to be a Faux commentator. Bill's opinions count for shit. His ego makes him believe he is an expert on urban problems because he once had an hour layover at the Newark Airport.

By the way Bill, does Lori Duhe wear too much lipstick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Protected Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Neither Bush nor Kerry are extremists."
Edited on Wed Jun-30-04 01:31 PM by Jonathan Little
"The far right in the USA has been largely quiet since Bill Clinton left office, so it is the far left that is really out of control right now. Senator Kerry would be well advised to understand that and distance himself from it."

The quiet far right? What nation is this guy living in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. so this is the same channel that accuses MM of bending facts
I really love the "France, Russia, and Germany were making billions" line. BS - Germany hardly had any business with Iraq at all (post GW1).

But the argument is strange anyway: it is not OK for Europe to be against a war because they're making billions, but the US waging war to make billions is fine. Go figure. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well...
O'Reilly says that the Iraq war was both moral and legal. Whoa!!!

I guess that is the final word. Case closed.

Gosh, I feel just silly for ever daring to question the morality and legality of the Iraq war. Egg on my face, that's for damn sure. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. I bet violence was down ....
... in Ireland for Bush's visit. All the Catholics and Protestants found something they can agree on. They could join hands and protest the insane American President.

Even the turks took time out from persecuting Kurds to hate President Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Taking money from Saddam ...
... well, Halliburton was doing business with Saddam. So I guess he's guilty as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. Stop listening to this Fucknut
Last night, he claimed that you were unAmerican if you attacked the three things America stands for:

Freedom ( so Bush, Rummy, Asscroft and Cheney are unAmerican)

Capitalism (so anyone who tried to block F 9/11 is Unamerican)

Representative form of government (anyone who cares more about their campaign contributors than they do about their constituency is UnAmerican. )


This guy is a pussy and an idiot, Stop listening to him before your head turns to mush. I turned him off last night because I was about to start screaming at the radio sitting in my car in a parking lot.

He is an "entertainer" with the brainpower of a booger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC