Here are 2 of the craziest insane talking points O'Dummy has ever spewed out of his right-wing ass. O'Dummy says Wes Clark lost the democratic nomination because he did not distance himself from Michael Moores comments about Bush being a deserter. That is insanity. And Bush was a deserter, he was AWOL for a year from his draft dodging fake National Guard duty. Moore was right and it has been proven.
He also says the far right has been quiet since Clinton left office, O'Dummy must be on drugs. All they talk about is Clinton, they talked about him for 2 years after he left office. They far right also blamed Clinton for every problem in America and the world for at least 3 years. They still do it to this day, yet O'Reilly thinks the far right has been quiet about Clinton.
What planet has he been living on, the far right has talked about Clinton non stop ever since he left office. I think O'Reilly is going insane and or he is senile and or he is both. His talking points get crazier every day, he really needs to get some mental help.
It is stunning how stupid O'Reilly is, if he actually believes that garbage he really needs some help.
--------
The Political Backlash is Coming...
Tuesday, June 29, 2004
By Bill O'Reilly
The political backlash is coming, that is the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo." You may remember that General Wesley Clark's presidential hopes were destroyed when he would not distance himself from Michael Moore's insane comment that President Bush was a deserter.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
PETER JENNINGS, MODERATOR: At one point, Mr. Moore said in front of you that President Bush -- he was saying he'd like to see a debate between you, the general, and President Bush, who he called a deserter. Now, that's a reckless charge not supported by the facts. And I was curious to know why you didn't contradict him?
WESLEY CLARK, FMR. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Well, I think Michael Moore has the right to say whatever he feels about this. I don't know whether this is supported by the facts or not. I have never looked at it. I have seen this charge bandied about a lot, but to me it wasn't material.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
All right, now most Democrats in this country aren't crazed ideologues and realized that Clark lacked the perspective to be president.
Read the rest here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124261,00.htmlNow check this one out.
Legitimate Dissent or Hurting America?
Monday, June 28, 2004 - Talking Points
By Bill O'Reilly
Legitimate dissent or hurting America? That's the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo." Over the weekend, President Bush visited Ireland and Turkey. In both places, anti-American demonstrators turned out spouting the usual blather about the USA being bad, evil, dangerous, that kind of thing.
But let's examine the record and pinpoint just who those demonstrators really are. The United States removed a dictator who slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people. Is that a bad action? We attacked Saddam because he violated the Gulf War cease-fire and 17 United Nations resolutions. So, America had a perfect legal right to do what it did; thus, vis-a-vis Saddam, America did the right thing both morally and legally.
But the U.N. didn't help in the removal of Saddam because countries like France, Russia, and Germany were making billions of dollars dealing with the dictator. That's bad, isn't it? Allowing a killer to violate U.N. resolutions because you're profiting. Isn't that bad?
But no. Millions of people have come to the conclusion that's not bad. America's the problem, for eliminating a killer without approval from corrupt individuals. The issue gets foggier because the weapons of mass destruction that Saddam allegedly possessed have not shown up and the post-war situation has been mismanaged by the USA to some extent. The handover today may correct that situation, and all loyal Americans should pray it does.
The rest of his lies are here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124123,00.html