An extraordinary email
Wednesday, July 28 2004 @ 11:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Contributed by: Admin I received this email yesterday, as a promo for Ian Williams' new book. I'll be getting a review copy within a couple of days and will review the book here. Mean time, here's some background from a former USAF lieutenant that I found interesting.
Michael Graham, a contemporary of George W. Bush's who served in the USAF, recently sent the following message to fellow military service people and veterans. It's an interesting look at the disillusionment and resentment Bush's less-than-valiant military service, and reckless willingness to commit other men and women to ill-advised wars, have created within the military community.
----
There is a new book about Bush which I, as a contemporary of his in the USAF officer corps, strongly urge you to read. It is a fast-written but factual book called Deserter: Bush's War On Military Families, Veterans, and his Past.
Tell every veteran you know to read this book carefully. But caution him to have an airsickness bag handy while reading it. He will learn about how Bush is going to screw him even more.
He'll also learn about Bush's hidden contempt for the military, as opposed to his phony shows of patriotism in front of captive audiences of soldiers.
Also pass this on to any Republicans you might know. Before they get suckered any more by this clown, they should know a few of the facts about his "patriotism."
If anyone reads this book and still votes for this five-star phony, then we are in deeper doo-doo than even I thought. The book is a screed, a scream in the night about the true character of George W. Bush.
All this militaristic posturing of Bush's is based on a huge lie this guy is telling himself, one which he actually believes -- that he is now, in fact, as big a war hero as Daddy. As some comedian said "The Treasury Department should start issuing three-dollar bills, just to have somewhere to put his picture."
That would be funny if it weren't so true. But the real danger of George W. Bush isn't his phoniness, it's the fact that he believes himself to be the right hand of God, therefore infallible. Not even another infallible guy, the Pope, could convince Bush he was wrong about Iraq.
The author of Deserter, Ian Williams, is UN correspondent for The Nation. Nation Books is the publisher.
As an example of what's in the book, Mr. Williams has at last answered a burning, obsessive question I have had for months: Just how did Mr. Bush earned his commission as a second lieutenant in the Air National Guard? It's a natural enough question, since Bush and I wore exactly the same uniform at exactly the same time.
(Although I didn't wear mine very often; I was in the real Air Force, in a counter-intelligence unit where we wore plainclothes.)
The answer is -- Bush didn't earn it. Because of a quirk in Texas National Guard commissioning powers, Bush was simply handed an officer's commission directly upon finishing basic enlisted training.
Enlisted training does not qualifiy you to be a commissioned officer. Officer Training School does that. But apparently that stringent requirement applied only to us in the real Air Force.
From page 91 of Deserter: "You would think that Bush the Young would boast in his memoirs about his truly historic and meteoric promotion record. After six weeks basic training, by the beginning of September 1968, he was deemed such an outstanding officer that he was made second lieutenant without the tedium and formality of attending officer training school..."
So you know that lieutenant's bar on Bush's fllght cap in those smiley-face fighter pilot pictures? He didn't earn it. He was, you might say, an honorary lieutenant.
Now I confess to a personal resentment. No one offered me a deal like that. I had to go through an extremely rigorous training program -- as I recall it was 12 weeks -- at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas. The day I pinned on my lieutenant's bars was one of the proudest days of my life, because getting there was so hard.
Similarly, all the other junior officers of my generation had to earn their commissions, too. They went through one of the service academies, through ROTC in college, or through a crash course in OTS or OCS after earning their college degrees. The only exceptions -- in the real Air Force, at least -- were flight surgeons.
So what we have here, Mr. Williams confirms, is a prancing president who has reinvented himself as a war hero -- AND NEVER EVEN WENT THROUGH THE PROPER TRAINING TO BE A LIEUTENTANT. His military "rank" carries about as much weight as Harlan Sanders' rank of "Colonel." Yet even the highest-ranking noncommissioned officer -- the Senior Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force -- would have been required to render a hand salute when passing "Lt." Bush on the steet.
So that's it. Thank you, Mr. Williams. What we have here is the COLONEL SANDERS LIEUTENANT. When we refer to him in writing or speech, we should call him the former Honorary First Lieutenant Bush. He was an honorary officer in a toy air force.
Below is a portion of a congratulatory e-mail I sent the Deserter author this morning. This will make you understand the importance of this commissioning issue. I describe what Bush missed by not getting properly trained.
----
Bush missed having the Honor Code drilled into his head from day one. I was in Officer Training School (OTS) class 67-E. That was a long time ago now, but I can still recite it in my sleep. Here is the Air Force Academy's official statement on the subject:
The Honor Code is the centerpiece of a cadet's moral and ethical development. Cadets pledge: "We will not lie, steal, or cheat, nor tolerate among us anyone who does." All cadets take formal courses in ethics and receive honor and ethics instruction as part of their training.
It was the exactly the same with us in OTS. Ethics and honor, drummed into our heads. We, of course, had come of age in the JFK era, and we actually believe in things like that. (Some of us still do.)
The Army has its version of the Honor Code, the Navy and Marine Corps theirs, with only slightly different wording. So John Kerry had the Navy version drummed into this head in what they call Officer Candidate School. It's the universal code of conduct of an officer and a gentleman. (That's the gentleman part.) An American military officer isn't supposed to lie, steal or cheat. Period. Presumably that also applies to the Commander-in-Chief.
Bush also missed leadership training, the history of warfare, strategy and tactics -- stuff like that. He missed the humility of being an equal among equals, at the bottom of the shit chute. He missed learning about the value of teamwork... Find the old movie An Officer and a Gentleman and you'll see what he missed.
Anyway, there it is. As far as I know, no one in the mainstream press has yet picked up on the signifance of the honorary lieutenant story.
If you read Deserter, you'll also understand how this little excursion into Iraq is a function of Bush's daddy hangup, and a lot of other things.
You'll also learn in considerable detail the contempt he really has for the military. He has made the Pentagon his own personal toy, drunk with power and in love with himself as the "Commander in Chief."
The biggest coward in the history of the Presidency has re-invented himself as a war hero, and this book shows how he did it. It's downright Orwellian.
Pass this on.
Mike Graham
Buy the Book
http://www.blah3.com/