Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader ballot acess update-list of states so far w/ submitted sigs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:34 PM
Original message
Nader ballot acess update-list of states so far w/ submitted sigs
for those who who've been asking:



Nader-Camejo Campaign Submits Signatures in
Arkansas, Maryland and Pennsylvania

Washington, DC: The Independent Presidential Campaign of Ralph Nader
submitted more than the required signatures today in Arkansas, Maryland
and Pennsylvania.

The Nader-Camejo Campaign is active collecting signatures for ballot
throughout the United States. Forty-six states have their deadlines in
July or later. The Nader-Camejo campaign has submitted signatures in 13
states. In addition, the Reform Party includes the potential for seven
state ballot lines.

States where signatures will have been submitted by the end of today
include: Arizona, Arkansas, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri,
Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, South Dakota,
and West Virginia. States where the Reform Party has ballot lines
include: Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, Mississippi, and
South Carolina.

Ralph Nader said “It is becoming evident that the Nader-Camejo campaign
will be on the ballot in most states. This will be a national campaign
on the ballot in states with more than the 270 electoral votes needed to
win the presidency. It is time for the Democratic Party to stop its
obstructionist efforts. The Democrats should debate or adopt our policy
priorities that improve the present and future well-being of the
American people and their relations with the world.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. and I said back to Nader
F off you idiot. now isnt the time, you are only hurting your own friggin cause. go away now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. some of these are highly disputed
like illinois for example

and arizona, where ralph has more or less conceded
his candidacy as a write-in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cicero Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Might not even be a write-in in North Carolina
:shrug:

later,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Asshole.
"It is time for the Democratic Party to stop its
obstructionist efforts. The Democrats should debate or adopt our policy
priorities that improve the present and future well-being of the
American people and their relations with the world.”

Tell me Ralph, when will you take responsibility for your actions? You contributed mightily to Bush's 1st selection. When is your ego gonna give us a break?

I do hope that all the Republicans who signed your petition will also vote for you in November....but I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. When Kerry wins, he should deny access to Nader
Shut him out. Teach him a lesson. He could have played king maker. Instead, let him be a nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psyntist Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Now really
Look, I has much as anyone would prefer a world where Nader was not running in this election but to deny him the right to be in the election is just plain undemocratic. No two ways about it.

I just wish that Nader was not such a big HYPOCRITE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It wouldn't affect Nader at all friend
After all, aren't the Dems and 'Pugs already teaming up to shut him out, you know, like the debates, the media, etc. etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Pugs support him!
Only the Dems don't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC