Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fabricating Terror

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:28 PM
Original message
Fabricating Terror
First, read this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2146960

Thanks again.

This will be a link by 7pm EST, and I will post it here. Please don't forward this anywhere (if you are so inclined, again with thanks) until then; it may change in the next couple of hours.

==

Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge came barnstorming out on Sunday with a blizzard of warnings about looming terror attacks against targets in New York, New Jersey and Washington DC. Our nifty color-coded alert system was raised to Orange, or High. Headlines from coast to coast blared the bad news, and the stock market began Monday by giving itself a sound beating.

Late Monday night, however, had articles popping up on the Washington Post and the New York Times. This was the Post's midnight take: "Most of the al Qaeda surveillance of five financial institutions that led to a new terrorism alert Sunday was conducted before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and authorities are not sure whether the casing of the buildings has continued, numerous intelligence and law enforcement officials said yesterday...'There is nothing right now that we're hearing that is new,' said one senior law enforcement official who was briefed on the alert. 'Why did we go to this level? I still don't know that.'"

The data was three years old.

Tom Ridge, in his Sunday remarks, said, "President Bush has told you, and I have reiterated the promise, that when we have specific credible information, that we will share it. Now this afternoon, we do have new and unusually specific information about where al-Qaeda would like to attack."

The data was three years old.

"The quality of this intelligence," said Ridge on Sunday, "based on multiple reporting streams in multiple locations, is rarely seen and it is alarming in both the amount and specificity of the information."

The data was three years old.

"As of now," said Ridge on Sunday, "this is what we know: reports indicate that al-Qaeda is targeting several specific buildings, including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank in the District of Columbia; Prudential Financial in Northern New Jersey; and Citigroup buildings and the New York Stock Exchange in New York."

The data was three years old.

"I certainly realize that this is sobering news," said Ridge on Sunday, "not just about the intent of our enemies, but of their specific plans and a glimpse into their methods."

The data was three years old.

"But we must understand," said Ridge on Sunday, "that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the President's leadership in the war against terror."

The data was three years old.

Furthermore, according to the Washington Post, "Several officials also said that much of the information compiled by terrorist operatives about the buildings in Washington, New York and Newark was obtained through the Internet or other 'open sources' available to the general public, including some floor plans." The data was three years old, gathered on the Internet, and delivered to the American people in tones of doom, as if the hammer were about to fall at any moment.

As reported on the Bloomberg newswire, Laura Bush and the daughters Barbara and Jenna Bush held a photo-op at the Citigroup Center in New York City on Monday, the first day of Ridge's new Orange alert. This was one of the target buildings, according to Ridge. George W. Bush sent his entire family to the very place that was supposedly about to be blown to smithereens?

I don't think so.

George W. Bush and his administration officials are using terrorism - the fear of it, the fight against it - to manipulate domestic American politics. They are, as they have every day for almost three years now, using September 11 against their own people. They are also getting stumblingly obvious about it. We are being lied to, clumsily, again.

Do you doubt it? Recall, if you will, the report in July by John Judis, Spencer Ackerman, and Massoud Ansari of the New Republic titled 'July Surprise'. The report read, "This spring, the administration significantly increased its pressure on Pakistan to kill or capture Osama bin Laden, his deputy, Ayman Al Zawahiri, or the Taliban's Mullah Mohammed Omar, all of whom are believed to be hiding in the lawless tribal areas of Pakistan. A succession of high-level American officials--from outgoing CIA Director George Tenet to Secretary of State Colin Powell to Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca to State Department counterterrorism chief Cofer Black to a top CIA South Asia official--have visited Pakistan in recent months to urge General Pervez Musharraf's government to do more in the war on terrorism."

The kicker appears in the next paragraph: "A third source, an official who works under ISI's director, Lieutenant General Ehsan ul-Haq, informed TNR that the Pakistanis 'have been told at every level that apprehension or killing of HVTs (High Value Targets) before (the) election is (an) absolute must.' What's more, this source claims that Bush administration officials have told their Pakistani counterparts they have a date in mind for announcing this achievement: 'The last ten days of July deadline has been given repeatedly by visitors to Islamabad and during (ul-Haq's) meetings in Washington.'...But according to this ISI official, a White House aide told ul-Haq last spring that 'it would be best if the arrest or killing of (any) HVT were announced on twenty-six, twenty-seven, or twenty-eight July'--the first three days of the Democratic National Convention in Boston."

On the Thursday of the Democratic convention in Boston, the day John Kerry was to accept the nomination and deliver the central speech of the week, Pakistan announced the capture of Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a Tanzanian Al Qaeda operative wanted in connection with the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Pakistan, it seems, got the message from Tenet, Powell, Rocca, Black and the Bush administration itself.

They delivered the terrorist exactly on cue.

In that instance, clearly Bush's people wanted to use terrorism to deflect attention from the Democratic convention. What were they trying to distract us from with this Sunday warning nonsense?

It is possible they are looking to dissuade some of the 500,000 protesters, who are planning to surround the Republican convention in New York at the end of the month, from making the trip. Yet that seems unlikely; the convention is three weeks away, so it is a bit early to start scaring people. More likely, they are looking to distract from the poll-numbers bump Kerry and Edwards are enjoying in the aftermath of a highly successful convention. Could it be as simple and craven as that? Absolutely yes, it could.

Perhaps more interesting is the manner in which this fraud was exposed. Ridge made the announcement on Sunday, and within 24 hours, a whole crowd of 'officials' roared out to expose the dated nature of the information. In other words, the long-abused intelligence community saw the Bush administration jerking the terror alert system around, and threw a few torpedoes into their side.

That Bush and his people are using terror to manipulate the American people isn't the worst part of this, hard as that may be to believe. The worst part of this is that September 11 happened, that warnings of a potential attack are necessary to the public safety when merited, and that every time Bush uses these warnings to assist his election campaign, the people tune out the warnings even further. This may well get a lot of people killed someday. When you cry wolf long enough, people will ignore you when the wolf actually comes to the door.

What's next?

I can see it now. A flash will come across the wires some morning soon: The Homeland Security Department has released an Orange Alert notification, based on credible and up-to-date evidence, that a bug in millions of computer systems could cause major disruptions at the turn of the millennium.

They are thinking of calling it 'The Millennium Terrabug.' Keep your eyes peeled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought the market went up by 39 points yesterday??
Did I hear that incorrectly?

Keep it alive. It will take a while for this story to develop, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It started the day waaaaaaaaaaaaay down
and then came back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. well said..sadly, no mainstream media source will state the obvious here.
Edited on Tue Aug-03-04 02:03 PM by Manix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Will, there's a future for you as
a trial lawyer. This is just devistating. I call for a directed verdict! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL
No thanks. There's a thread about the LSAT in the Lounge. Someone asking for advice about the test. I advised, based on my own LSAT experience, that the poster kill himself. :)

The lawyer boat sailed. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm Surprised that Bush
didn't read the warning and then go on vacation like he did before 9/11. The nation is a lot safer when he's fishing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Great job, Will....
Mamas don't let your babies grow up to be lawyers ....
Talk about targets of hate!!!

Stick to what you are doing, you are very gifted!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks WilliamPitt!

Very well written, you concisely pointed out the facts. I really like your repeated use of "The data was three years old." It really drove the point home.

I heard Ridge state that he 'doesn't do politics' yet he has the audacity to say:

"But we must understand," said Ridge on Sunday, "that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the President's leadership in the war against terror."

Well I guess the president is doing a real bang-up job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Really excellent piece, Will. Perfect tone.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Question??? Wasn't This Why We Went To Afghanistan?
This material was pre 9/11 and more specific, prior to the routing of Al Queda from Afghanistan. I remember news reports of finding tons of CDs and puters loaded with blueprints and other plans of strategic targets, including the WTC, Pentagon and others.

When I first heard this "non-story" now on Sunday (acutally when I heard Pakistan had coughed up an Al Queda morsel during the DNC) I thought about all that data and now wonder...

What has happened to that data and how has it been shared with our "homeland" security people...the real ones...the cops who guard the possible bank on the truck bomb target list or the power plant or rail yard or wherever. Supposedly there was lots of this information that was being generated, what's happened to this...or is this material for the next chickenhawk little alert?

Also...do these mental midgets ever take into consideration that those plans were drawn up prior to a massive disruption in the Al Queda network. Good chance the master-mind or money men or someone in the critical chain that makes this terror network work was either killed, given a one-way ticket to Gitmo or just faded into Pakistan. Are we three years behind these people? That's an even scarier thought.

Kudos, Will...an article worth sharing with those who need to be shown more light on the devious political actions of this regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for including the Laura & daughters story...
How that came about would probably be an interesting story in itself. I read here Sunday that Mayor Bloomberg wasn't exactly happy about the new terror alert. A few calls must have been made and, poof, there's Laura, daughters and the NY Governor on scene to quiet the nervous office workers.

So they play the story up in NYC, but how to spin it in the rest of the country? If the Terror Alert is real, Bush seems chicken shit. If they play down the Alert.... So, they keep it a local story.

Oh, to have been a fly on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green Lantern Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Maybe
they wanted Bushwa to look strong, a leader, a President, by going to the big city that just had a big terror alert. Funny tho, that he had to have his women smooth the path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll print copies of the final version & bring it to kerry meetup tonight
excellent work. the threads on this at DU have been fast and AWESOME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Will, check this out: CNN reported a similar threat in April, 2002!!
You might want to look into this and add it to your piece, if you think it fits. Great research by DUer Carni, below:

CNN/Reported on this "New" warning in April 2002! by DUer Carni

This is the same stupid warning issued over two years ago.
The below is from CNN but they still question that this was old news?

http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:OLXY6fG-QaUJ:www.c...


Sources: al Qaeda linked to bank threat


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The FBI announced Friday that the government has received a new, unsubstantiated terrorist threat against U.S. financial institutions -- a threat, sources said, that was to be carried out by al Qaeda operatives.

"Unspecified terrorists are considering physical attacks against U.S. financial institutions in the Northeast, particularly banks, as part of their campaign against U.S. financial interests," the FBI said.

Sources said the information indicated a possible mode of attack was suicide bombing.

The information that led to the alert, the sources said, came from a variety of intelligence sources, including al Qaeda detainees captured as part of the ongoing war against terrorism. Law enforcement learned the information in the last couple of days, the sources said.

One U.S. official told CNN that Abu Zubaydah, the highest ranking al Qaeda leader in U.S. custody, was a key source in providing the information about the threat. Zubaydah -- al Qaeda's head of operations and man in charge of recruiting -- was arrested in Pakistan earlier this month, handed over to U.S. custody and is being held at an undisclosed location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Link to final
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. printed 25 copies for distrubution
prints nicely on one doublesided page!

also printed obama speech, bill clinton speech, krugman's latest, 2 Tom the Dancing Bug cartoons, and 2 Get Your War On pages...

JK in 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Will, I IM'd you with a possible addition
A DUer found a link to a CNN article from a year ago about the same threat.

Looks like not only has it been known for a long time, its already been reported.

Not sure if it fits in with your already excellent article, but it may be worth a look see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Damn
Too late. I'll use it next time. It's a great angle. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Breaking: Officials Say Financial Targets Face NO IMMEDIATE THREAT
Edited on Tue Aug-03-04 09:50 PM by cryingshame
Here's something else to file for future reference... :)


Officials: Financial targets face no immediate threat



By Kevin Johnson and Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

Posted 8/3/2004 4:38 PM Updated 8/3/2004 4:47 PM

WASHINGTON — The major U.S. financial institutions identified in a recently disclosed al-Qaeda surveillance
operation are not believed to be at imminent risk of attack, two federal law enforcement officials with
knowledge of the investigation said Tuesday.

Although U.S. authorities continue to analyze a raft of detailed information outlining terrorist reconnaissance
work at five financial centers in New York, Newark, N.J., and Washington, D.C., the material does not point
to an existing plan of attack, said the law enforcement officials, who asked not to be identified because the
matter remains under investigation.

The comments come as authorities in New York, New Jersey and Washington are intensifying security
measures and restricting traffic in response to the warnings.

The alerts also have touched off an election-year debate over the handling of sensitive threat information.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-08-03-ridg..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. You Essentially Buried Ridge's Damning Statement
which outed the whole bogus nature of his press conference.

But we must understand," said Ridge on Sunday, "that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the President's leadership in the war against terror."

The way your article reads... it just gets lost in the repitition of "three days old".

IMO, Ridge's above statement should stand alone and be highlighted, scrutinized and then saved for future reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC