Ok no bounce for kerry BUT HE IS LEADING... in MOST polls..

[southernleftylady]

so whats the problem?
i dont understand what is all this talk about no bounce?

[LuminousX]

1. Consistent surge ... no bounce needed

Kerry was ahead before the convention and he leads after the convention. Bouncing is only for those who have ground to make up.

[RodneyCK2]

2. See this thread...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x593429

[ibegurpard]

3. Why the fuck was anyone here buying into the idea that there WOULD

be a big bounce? It was a Republican set-up to destroy expectations. As for polls, ignore them even when they're good (which for the most part they are). Work like you're ten points behind no matter WHAT the polls say.

[DinahMoeHum]

4. Something tells me this election will not even be close. . .

It's pretty damn tough to make chicken salad out of chicken shit twice in a row.

As Larry Flynt (Hustler) has said that since September 2003: "Americans were waking up and smelling something other than the coffee."


:kick:

[southernleftylady]

5. i cant imagine it being this close!

i mean i havent heard ONE person who changed from gore to bush but i have heard PLENTY of the opposite... but my hubby said "its where you find your info of course you wont hear any from the other side"
i just cant imagine it though

[CaTeacher]

6. My Aunt voted Gore

last time and will vote Bush this time. (she voted for Clinton in 1996 and Perot in 1992). They are out there--but not very many. I read a poll somewhere that said 8-10 percent of people who voted for Bush last time will go for Kerry this time--and that about 4% of those who voted for Gore will vote for Bush. So--we are going to be ahead by any measure.