Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the Repukes want to bring up JK's congressional record! Let em!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 04:33 PM
Original message
So the Repukes want to bring up JK's congressional record! Let em!
Edited on Tue Aug-03-04 04:34 PM by trumad
Because the Kerry campaign just blew them out of the water! Bwwhhhaaaa!

From Atrios:

Legislative Accomplishments

Cheney, 11 years in the House:

96th Congress: 4 Sponsored; 0 became Law

97th Congress: 4 Sponsored: 0 became Law

98th Congress: 8 Sponsored: 0 became Law

99th Congress: 7 Sponsored: 1 became Law
(H.R.1246 : A bill to establish a federally declared floodway for the Colorado River below Davis Dam.)

100th Congress: 7 Sponsored: 1 became Law

(H.R.712 : A bill for the relief of Lawrence K. Lunt.)

101st Congress: 1 Sponsored: 0 became Law

Taken from a Kerry press release, which included this quote from Congressman Spratt (D-SC):

Dick Cheney served in the Congress for 11 years. I served with him for most of these years. In that time, he only passed two bills. One was to build a flood plain on the Colorado River and the other was a bill to help a constituent. What’s even more telling about Dick Cheney’s record in the House is not what he supported but what he opposed – things like Headstart and funding for seniors. It seems pretty dishonest for Bush and Cheney to be attacking John Kerry - who passed 57 bills in the Senate – for his legislative accomplishments.
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_atrios_archive.html#109156850648379146
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. "It seems pretty dishonest for Bush and Cheney ..." - since when
has that ever stopped them from anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there a Kerry side to the argument?
Otherwise, I'm never gonna get anywhere with my Freeper co-workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah... Kerry got 57 bills passed in his Senate career
Cheney in his 11 only got 2 meaningless bills passed. That's an easy talking point for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's "Rope-a-Dope" time
IMO, Kerry is waiting until the Repukes work themselves up into a frenzy about how Kerry is "hiding" his Senate resume. Once they've gone overboard, Kerry will start talking about how he create reconcile with VietNam, his investigations of BCCI and Iran-Contra, his environmental, civil rights, women's rights, and labor issues, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Rope-a-dope" worries me, Sangh0
Was Al Gore playing rope-a-dope in 2000 when he didn't forcefully put down the Love Canal, Internet Invention, "serial exaggerator" spins
until it was too late to dislodge them from the idiot public discourse?
What worries me about saving your fire in a political campaign, is that undecided voters usually have a very limited attention span...and if some undecideds make their choices now and go back to Survivor reruns or whatever it is that they care about, we will have missed the chance to convince them. An information operation that puts the message AND the rebuttals out there everyday seems to me to be a stronger way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Kerry is not Gore
Your concerns are legitimate, and so I'm not going to dismiss them out of hand. However, I don't think it's wise to compare Kerry to Gore. Kerry has a long record of doing this, and it seems his experience has served him well in this regard.

This isn't to say that Kerry's tactics can't be beat, they could, but I wouldn't assume that because of anything Gore did. Kerry may hold his fire for a time, but the record shows he's not afraid to fire when the timing is right, and he doesn't wait forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agreed...
It's just that the "he voted FOR the war and then he voted AGAINST our troops" bullshit is STILL hanging out there. I've read enough to know it's bullshit...but I just wish the Kerry campaign would shoot it down NOW, once and for all, with as much firepower as it takes. (Then again, maybe he's waiting for the first debate, so he can ask Dubya to his face why, if he was so concerned about the troops, did he {DUBYA} threatened to veto the whole damn appropriation to save his rich man's tax cut? )
I live in hope. And in the meantime, I fret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It will be sooo fun!!!
And Georgie did what?? Bankrupted oil company after oil company? Put the people of Arlington on the hook for is baseball stadium so he could walk away with the profit?

I can't wait for this fight!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. And wasn't Cheney one of only two in Congress who voted
against money for school lunch programs every single year?
Compassionate conservative my ass! And how pro-education is it to demand school teachers to teach hungry children? Can't be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC