Why is the media silent on the Sandy Berger issue...?

[imax2268]

The only evidence that this was even brought up was with the Wall Street Journal article buried about 6 pages in...

What the hell...?

If the media is so "liberal" as the righties claim...then where are the stories about this...?

[The_Casual_Observer]

1. Sandy was absolved, no case, no nothing

The press has no interest in this, it would make them look bad.

[MO_Dem]

2. Rove and Cheney and Duh?bya

told 'em to keep quiet NOW--like they told 'em to flog it for all it was worth BEFORE! My opinion!

[imax2268]

3. Well...

so much for the righties and their "liberal media" theory...

[Frances]

4. But Berger was discredited

and so was Valerie Plame's husband. That's what one of the callers to a CNN program said this morning. The caller said that we shouldn't vote for Kerry because these men were advising Kerry on foreign policy.

Rove achieved his purpose. He "discredited" the Bush critics in prime time, but the disclaimers are not publicized.

On edit: corrected typo

[DeepModem Mom]

5. kick

[bklyncowgirl]

6. Berger cleared--Oh never mind.

The Democrats should have made sure this got out there. Most people still think that Berger has been discredited and that makes Kerry look bad.

I'm concerned that our guys are somehow convinced that the Republicans are playing by the same rules they are.