Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just viewed the DVD "9-11 In Plane Site" - OMG! OMG! OMG!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:31 PM
Original message
Just viewed the DVD "9-11 In Plane Site" - OMG! OMG! OMG!
Edited on Wed Aug-04-04 10:34 PM by Ugnmoose
If you not ordered a copy, I strongly suggest you get one. It can be ordered by going to www.thepowerhour.com.

After viewing this DVD, there is no way that any rational human being could not conclude that the events surrounding the 9-11 attacks were the result of a conspiracy. The viewer is shown actual media footage some of which has only been seen just once and never seen again. This footage clearly establishes the following:

The Pentagon could not have been hit by a Boeing 757, but rather was likely struck by a "bunker buster" missle.

The World Trade Center Towers were not struck by U.S. Commercial Jetliners. Rather the planes that hit the Towers were identified by eye-witnesses to look like cargo planes with no windows.

Also clearly established through photographic evidence is that the second plane that struck the South Tower had a missle like device strapped to its underbelly and that this object ignited in a flash prior to the fuselage striking the building. This same flash was witnessed in the only picture taken of the first plane as it struck the North Tower.

Finally, and most disturbing. is actual footage that shows a separate explosion near the base of the Trade Center. The flames from this explosion can be seen clearly rising in the air some forty story's high but in no way are they coming from either of the Towers which were both still standing at the time. This had to be a controlled detonation. Also many eyewitnesses including fireman interviewed at the scene claimed to have heard loud explosions going off that would be consistent with detonators. And in viewing the collapse of the two towers and building 7, they all fell in the same manner, as if they had been imploded, one floor on top of the other.

All I can say is I am both sick to my stomach and frightened to death. What is becoming of this country? Rather than saying God Bless America, I think we should all be praying that God Save America!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing I have not heard already
but this is a stretch. i don't know if Bush Co. is that evil. I would like to see the movie for myself thought. Maybe, you never know, but for now I will keep my :tinfoilhat: on about this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramblin_dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Disinfo alert - see previous thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does this magical film explain WHERE THE PEOPLE are?
Um...if no plane hit the pentagon and cargo planes hit the WTC, WHERE are the hundreds of people who were on those commercial flights.

Perhaps the filmmakers can call their families and let them know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. they're all having shoo fly pie at Elvis' diner in West Kalamazoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. In a bunker under Area 51
Hanging out with Cheney, Elvis, Tupac, Biggie, Jerry Garcia and some martians. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. And Andy Kaufman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Yeah...
..I hear Pac and Biggie made up and shit....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Blasphemers! It was the Rapture.
God told me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. What percentage do you get?
Because it's utter bullshit. Yes, a plane hit the Pentagon.

And the earth is not flat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was a conspiracy.
I am not sure exactly how it was done. But it was definately a MIHOP. How anyone can be in denial about that almost 3 years after the crime is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL!
You don't know how it is MIHOP but it is? Maybe you should explain your point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Some examples that contribute to MIHOP
Some examples that contribute to the MIHOP are the fact that the plane that hit the pentagon did not have a wide enough wing span to hit objects on the way to the pentagon that should have been in the way of a plane that size.

The fact that the cell phone calls appear to be be staged lead to MIHOP. Find the links and read the text about the phone calls.

Also, if this was not MIHOP, why didn't the government respond? Why were there war games to prepare for this scenario that morning but no action taken when the planes went rogue?

The idea that the government could have landed these planes moved the people on the planes into one plane and exploded them over the ocean is a thought for what happened to the people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Call me crazy, stupid, nieve, whatever,
but wouldn't wreckage of said plane be found somewhere? I know I sound dumb saying this but it does have validity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yea I'm sure it should be found somewhere
Which begs the question how much of the pentagon plane was found.

It has been several months since I browsed the conspiracy viewpoints but another point that was made about the pentagon was that so little of the plane was found yet the building was realatively unharmed.

The explanation by the media was that it was because it was THE PENTAGON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The Pentagon is hardly a regular office building
The section that was hit, had been renovated beforehand as part of a massive project to bring the building up to code and reinforce the structure, I believe that the walls were touted to be resistant to explosives, but I really am not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I have been around here for a couple of years and I have read
enough to believe what I believe. I let you do your own research. Here is a place to start. PM me if you want some more, but this will keep ya busy for a while.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1836172

Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Tue Jun-22-04 11:18 AM
Original message
The DU 9/11 reading room

Edited on Tue Jun-22-04 11:22 AM by Minstrel Boy
DU has been, I think, the premier sounding board for challenging the official story, and a great resource for 9/11 skeptics. Here's a compilation of some DU 9/11 threads I'd bookmarked, for the next time someone starts yukking it up about how LIHOP/MIHOP is nothing but groundless tinfoil.

DEEP BACKGROUND

9/11: The BCCI Connection
Yet there is a curious continuity here - one that highlights the global infrastructure that has made 9/11 such a successful worldwide "op", with a legend whose global parameters defy the perceptions of even the most dogged investigators. As Peter Dale Scott has argued in great and persuasive detail, the "deep political structure" of American society - and I would argue that this now applies globally - is permeated by an interwoven nexus between political/corporate elites and an organized criminal subculture, whereby certain political or business arrangements are made in an extra-legal sphere, beyond the reach of sanction or salience. Although this dual-purpose netherworld has been with us for over a century - and roughly parallels the rise of an American industrial "Establishment" of which the Bushes and Rockefellers are most representative - for our purposes, we will date the true globalization of this "deep political structure" with the creation of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, better known as BCCI.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Guess who ties ENRON to BCCI?
Money laundering, as Chairperson Gramm testified, is not even a violation of the Commodities Futures Trading Act. Incredibly, it appears that the CFTC and the self-regulatory organizations have never even made a criminal referral for possible money laundering....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/du...

George W Bush connection to the BCCI scandal
After dominating the financial news throughout the 1990s, the BCCI is now at the center of the financial network put in place by Osama bin Laden's main supporters.

...

Ghaith Pharon sold a part in his stake to BCCI to (Bush financier) Khalid bin Mahfhouz and his brothers, who became 20% shareholders in the bank. BCCI also had ties with Abu Nidal, with drug lord Pablo Esobar, Noreiga.

In addition to BCCI, Islamic Charities have been and are used to finance terrorist networks, including Hamas. Khalid bin Mahfouz's son, Abdul Rahman, is the Sudanese branch manager of Muwafaq, supspected of helping to organize the assassination attempt of Hosni Mubarak, and also accused by the CIA of having received funds via the Saudi National Commercial Bank, headed at the time by Khalid.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Connecting The Dots: Bush..Bath..Bin Laden
Salem bin Laden appointed James Bath, a close friend of Bush who served with him in the Air National Guard, as his representative in Houston, Texas....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


Spring 1971 Bush Using National Guard F102 to Shuttle "Tropical Plants"
Once or twice a month, Bush would announce that he had flight duty and off he would go, sometimes taking his F-102 from Houston to Orlando and back. "It was really quite amazing," Knudtzon said. "Here was this young guy making acquisitions of tropical plants and then up and leaving to fly fighter planes."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Spies hide as Bank faces BCCI charges
Then there is the small matter of the role played by Britain's intelligence services, whose relationship with BCCI has long been questioned. Did MI6 use accounts at the secretive bank to pay sources and operatives around the world? Did BCCI channel Western funds to Mujahideen fighters in the Eighties - or even, as some conspiracy theorists have surmised, to Osama bin Laden?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/du...

Jonathan Bush's Riggs Bank fined for money laundering, proved for financing terrorism
The Federal Reserve ordered Riggs Bank's parent company Friday to take steps to prevent money laundering after the bank was fined $25 million in connection with a probe into possible links to terrorism financing.

The action came a day after Treasury Department regulators levied the record-setting fine against Riggs for its handling of millions of dollars in foreign-held accounts.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Strauss, Neocons and Terror
Strauss himself taught that under certain circumstances real men "may be forced into a mere negation of the universal and homogeneous state, into a negation not enlightened by any positive goal, into a nihilistic negation." He went on to elaborate that " that nihilistic revolution may be the only action on behalf of man’s humanity, the only great and noble deed that is possible once the universal and homogeneous state has become inevitable . The successful revolt the primitive horde." In European thought, nihilism was often equated to anarchist bomb-throwers; the nihilistic revolution was a synonym for fascism and Nazism. Strauss endorsed all this. His nihilistic revolution opens the door to terrorism, war, mayhem, genocide, and much more. He explicitly endorses actions that would take mankind back to the primal horde, that is to say the hunting and gathering society of the old stone age, of the cave men. We must also recall that Strauss’s written doctrine is always more cautious than the oral tradition he transmitted to his direct and indirect disciples, among whom are the neocons now running the US government. The neocon doctrine is explicitly pro-terrorist.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

The Myth Of Al Qaeda
Yes, there are legitimate Muslim-led terrorist groups out there. But they are spread far and wide, are nationalistic, and are easily infiltrated by the agents provocateurs of "Al Qaeda" to lead them down the path of destruction and mayhem. These local groups are used and then discarded after the deed, and the terrorists the authorities then round up are usually clueless, brainwashed, local criminals who are effectively cut off from the true leadership of "Al Qaeda".

When you think Al Qaeda, you should also think CIA and MI5.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

PRE-9/11

Were these warnings specific enough, Condi?
Weeks before 9/11, urgent and detailed warnings from the Taliban, the Germans, the French, the Egyptians, the French, the British....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Hijackers trained at US military bases
Air Force spokesman Col. Ken McClellan said soon after the attacks that a man whose name was Mohamed Atta had attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base in Montgomery, Ala.... A man with the name Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School in San Antonio, Texas. Abdulaziz Alomari was reportedly a former Saudi Arabian pilot.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

CIA met with Bin Laden 2 months prior to 9/11
Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.

The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.

Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department. While there he was visited by several members of his family and Saudi personalities, and the CIA.

The CIA chief was seen in the lift, on his way to see Bin Laden, and later, it is alleged, boasted to friends about his contact. He was recalled to Washington soon afterwards.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Heroin, Al Qaeda and the Florida Flight School
Hopsicker is still researching the three Huffman-trained 9/11 pilots, who he says had financial, drug-trafficking and military intelligence ties to the U.S. government. He is developing suspicions that Atta and the entire school were involved with Osama bin Laden in heroin trafficking. Hopsicker reports that on July 25, 2000, the DEA in Orlando discovered more than 30 pounds of heroin inside a Learjet owned by Wally Hilliard, owner of Huffman Aviation. Earlier that month, on July 3, Atta and Marwan Al-Shehri had started flight lessons at Huffman. Hopsicker claims it's not a coincidence that Atta was allegedly importing heroin with Hilliard's help, selling Afghanistan's notorious opium and heroin to finance the Taliban. Hilliard would not be interviewed for this story.

"The apparatus that Osama bin Laden set into place along with the CIA back in the '80s, still exists," Hopsicker says. "The FBI is protecting an operation set in place back in the '80s...a money-laundering device to funnel money to the Afghan Mujahedeen and to flood this country with heroin."

...

That the Taliban made money from drugs is no surprise. But according to Hopsicker, the Venice operation was "protected" by top officials in the same U.S. government that created the Taliban (when the Taliban were known as the Mujahedeen, fighting the Soviets). Hopsicker says that when low-level DEA agents burst into Hilliard's plane on July 25, an embarrassed DEA higher-up was sitting in the co-pilot seat.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

May 8, 2001: Cheney begins coordinating response to domestic attacks
So here's Cheney, PNACer and oil man, already chairing a secretive energy commission (read its implications for military policy: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4458.ht... ), being named to head up a new agency which will "coordinate all federal programs for responding to domestic attacks"....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


Why did FBI Special Agent Frasca suppress field agent terrorist memos?
Special Agent Dave Frasca occupies a very important position mid-way between the Bush cabinet/FBI leadership and the FBI agents on the ground in various American cities. He is in the unusual position of taking important findings of intended radical Bin Laden-type terrorist actions to his supervisors, especially the heads of the FBI. Clearly, he was, along with the various world intelligence agencies, able to forward enough information through his supervisors to raise concerns with President Bush himself in July 2001.

...

Not only did Dave Frasca not share the information about Moussaoui to other appropriate intelligence/law enforcement authorities, he also, according to Rowley "never disclosed to the Minneapolis agents that the Phoenix Division had, only three weeks earlier, warned of Al Qaeda operatives in flight schools seeking flight training for terrorists purposes!" (Rowley's memo to FBI, May 21, 2002 p. 3) It is of course impossible to believe that Dave Frasca on his own, is just sitting on this information and not doing anything with it, unless ordered to do so.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Mohamed Atta loved pork chops, and 49 other things you may not know
11. Atta, Keller, a stripper named Linda and two Germans, Peter and Johan, partied for three days in Key West. Atta paid for everything. Rented three rooms, one just for the men’s luggage, which Keller says contained drugs. The men had a business meeting the women were not permitted to attend. Met with people, Keller says, who flew in just to meet Atta. Somber and quiet after meeting. (Key West Airport a known drug transit point. The Sheriff used to be under orders to keep the dope sniffing dogs off airplanes, and at one time even sent patrol cars to escort the drugs to Miami.)

12. Atta was already a licensed pilot when he arrived in the US. Licenses from many different countries. He had the privileges of an instructor while he was at Huffman Aviation, and may have helped pilot South American drug runs.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

New options put fear factor into trading (9/11 options trading)
After an exhaustive study, Allen Poteshman, a professor of finance at the University of Illinois, has confirmed news reports shortly after Sept. 11, 2001:

Trading in options on airline stocks AMR and UAL indicates someone profited from advance word of the terrorist attacks.

"There is evidence of unusual option market activity in the days leading up to Sept. 11," Poteshman writes in a paper posted on the Internet that goes deeper than the initial reports.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Bush knew. Now, do you?
Pakistan’s intelligence service, the ISI, is a long-time regional proxy of the CIA, and its principal agent for dealing with Mujaheddin groups during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. It’s revealed in the Fall of 2001 that Pakistani ISI chief Mahmood Ahmed had authorized a $100,000 wire transfer to Mohammed Atta. This same Ahmed was in Washington for a week, meeting with top US officials, at the time of the attacks. After the revelation he takes an early retirement. There is no report of him ever having been questioned by US authorities.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

SEPTEMBER 11

"bizarre coincidence": Cheney monitors crash simulation morning of 9/11
In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft crashed into one of its buildings....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

New bombshell: on 9/11 Pentagon conducted live-fly hijacking wargame
One of at least five wargames/simulations running on the morning of 9/11, under the auspices of the Joint Chiefs, was a live-fly exercise of a response to multiple hijackings. Numerous aircraft, military and civilian, were used in the exercise. With many fighters already committed to other wargames, the number remaining to respond to a threat were outnumbered by the number of apparently hijacked planes. And with the transponders switched off, identitifying the genuine threat from the simulated became even more difficult.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Rookie In Command Of National Mil. Command Ops Center On 9/11
National Military Command Center ops director asked newly-qualified substitute on Sept. 10 to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Another standdown: security at WTC on 9/11
The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday.

Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Power down at WTC 2 for 36 hours on 9/8 - 9/9
"On the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this situation since I work in IT and had to work with many others that weekend to ensure that all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ... and then brought back up afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for the power down was that cabling in the tower was being upgraded ...

"Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower. I was at home on the morning of 9/11 on the shore of Jersey City, right opposite the Towers, and watching events unfold I was convinced immediately that something was happening related to the weekend work."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Odigo says workers were warned two hours before attacks
Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Jeb Bush seized flight school records at 2 AM on September 12
Why did Jeb Bush and federal agents seize records from Huffman Aviation - Florida flight school of Mohammed Atta, and other 9/11 hijackers - in the middle of the night following the attacks of September 11th and load them onto a C-130? And why did Jeb Bush know, hours after the attack, where to look?

Whatever secrets Dekkers may possess about the terrorists, records from his flight school were deemed sensitive enough to have merited being escorted back to Washington by Florida Governor Jeb Bush aboard a C-130 cargo plane, which left Sarasota less than 24 hours after the September 11 attack.

...

"I sat down with two Southern lawmen, a current sheriff and his immediate predecessor. These two guys looked me dead in the eye and said that, based on what they have seen with a lot of CIA-connected covert operations in the area, the CIA was somehow involved in, if not responsible for, the World Trade Center attacks. You might expect some wild-eyed leftist radical to say that. But these are two Southern sheriffs. They have spent years watching CIA activities that they could not interfere with."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Raytheon, and Hani Hanjour's flight of fantasy
Hani Hanjour, the alleged pilot of Flight 77, was so unskilled, he'd been denied a Cessna just three weeks before. He'd tried to learn to fly for years, but his instructor found him hopeless. Yet three weeks later, Hanjour is said to have piloted a commercial airliner at 500 miles per hour so aerobatically a flight controller believed she was following the path of an F-18, perform a 270 degree spiralling descent of 5,000 feet over Washington in a matter of seconds, going out of his way to hit the Navy side of the five-storey high Pentagon: the one side which was virtually empty and undergoing reconstruction, and the only side whose exterior wall had been hardened to withstand attack.

A USA Today story from October 2001, announced that Raytheon had remote-flown a FedEx 727 to a safe landing on a New Mexico air force base in August 2001, without a pilot.

On at least three of the four sparsely occupied hijacked flights, there was a Raytheon employee. Including, on Flight 77, the plane which hit the Pentagon, Stanley Hall, director of program management for Raytheon's Electronics Warfare Division. A colleague called him "our dean of electronic warfare."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

POST-9/11

DOJ Asked FBI Translator To Change Pre 9-11 Intercepts
Sibel Edmonds: "Attorney General John Ashcroft told me 'he was invoking State Secret Privilage and National Security' when I told the FBI I wanted to go public with what I had translated from the pre 9-11 intercepts".
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Explosive new Sibel Edmonds interview
"...the issue, on one side, boils down to money--a lot of money. And it boils down to people and their connections with this money....

"You get to a point where it gets very complex, where you have money laundering activities, drug related activities, and terrorist support activities converging at certain points and becoming one.

"...if, and when this issue gets to be, under real terms, investigated, you will be seeing certain people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

State Dept. Quashed 9/11 Links To Global Drug Trade
Even as a judge prepares to permanently silence her, a former FBI translator of intelligence has implicated the US State Department in quashing investigations which had linked the 9/11 terrorist network to a global drug trafficking ring.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

FAA Official Scrapped Tape of 9/11 Controllers' Statements
The taping began before noon on Sept. 11 at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center, in Ronkonkoma, on Long Island, but it was later destroyed by an F.A.A. quality-assurance manager, who crushed the cassette in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, according to a report made public today by the inspector general of the Transportation Department.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Skinny Osama or Fat Osama: which is his best look?
Remember the last, and only time, we saw Fat Osama?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Grover Norquist Linked to Terrorists
Grover Norquist, whom most conservatives know as Executive Director of the College Republicans, boardmember of the NRA, and head of Americans for Tax Reform, has been exposed as helping Muslim groups and individuals who finance and support Islamic terrorism gain access to the Bush White House.

Norquist has also been exposed as the founder of the Islamic Insitute, a group believed to be funded by foreign governments, Wahhab Islam elements in Saudi Arabia, and U.S. Muslim groups recently raided by a special Treasury Department task force for funding Al Qaeda and Palestinian terrorists.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

The 9/11 whistleblowers-get-screwed data dump

Michael Springman, 22-year State Department veteran, and former head of the visa bureau in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Claims he was repeatedly overruled by high-level State Department officials to issue visas to bin Laden recruits so they could receive training in the United States. Says this continued at least until the summer of 2001. (Notably, 15 of the 9/11 hijackers first entered the US through Jeddah.) Springman protested, and was fired. Springman says he believes that the victims of 9/11 "may have been sacrificed in order to further wider US geopolitical objectives."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Dept. head who blocked Colleen Rowley given award
At a quiet little ceremony earlier this month, Marion (Spike) Bowman was one of nine people in the bureau to receive an award for "exceptional performance." The award carries with it a cash bonus of 20 to 35 percent of the recipient's salary and a framed certificate signed by the president.

What does this have to do with Rowley?

Bowman heads the FBI's National Security Law Unit. That's the unit that blocked Minneapolis agents from pursuing their suspicions about Moussaoui.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

9/11 director gave evidence to own inquiry
The panel set up to investigate why the United States failed to prevent the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, faced angry questions Thursday after revelations that two of its own senior officials were so closely involved in the events under investigation that they have been interviewed as part of the inquiry.

Philip Zelikow, the commission's executive director, worked on the Bush-Cheney transition team as the new administration took power, advising his longtime associate and former boss, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, on the incoming National Security Council.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Ashcroft may face prison over 9/11 cover-up, says Daniel Ellsberg
Ellsberg says that if Edmonds' allegations are confirmed, the current Attorney General could be judged obstructive and share the fate of A.G. John Mitchell --who in Ellsberg v. Mitchell famously tried to squelch Ellsberg's 1971 revelations, and served prison time over the affair.

...

"I'm not an expert on all this," he admits. "But I am increasingly open to the explanation that people in the administration did see this coming... and may have indeed reduced some obstacles..,or opened the door, in effect...."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Bush's 9/11 telephone logs don't exist
Mr. Kean: Well, the testimony we have is from the president and from the vice president and from Condi Rice, who says she overheard part of that phone call. The phone logs don't exist, because they evidently got so fouled up in communications that the phone logs have nothing. So that's the evidence we have.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Bush's evidence of demeanor
See for yourself.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1836172




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. My dad's Dr. is the bro of murdered BCCI investigator Danny Cassolaro
Remember him? Bumped off mysteriously while investigating the BCCI "octopus"?

I bet he would have dug into the 911 investigation, too, had they not gotten him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Some disturbing things that need answers
The commentator notes that there was only one camera recording after the Pentagon crash. Where are all the other cameras surrounding the building. This is the most secure building in the world. Every foot of this buidling is monitored and under constant surveillance. Why have we not seen the videos of the actual plane crashing into the building?


Also, as far a credibility is concerned, I ordered this DVD through Tom Flocco's website. I have found Tom to be a very trustworthy and credible investigative journalist who has been dogging the 9-11 discrepancies from day one.

I think one has to put this video in the context of all of the other discrepancies and unanswered questions including NORAD's failure to respond, Chimpy in the classroom, the pre-9-11 put options, etc. I for one remain solidly in the camp of conspiracy. There are just way too many "random" events here that cannot be explained away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Where are the people that were on the planes?
I know personally of one person who died on one of those planes. This is not to say that I don't believe there is some kind of government culpability in 9/11 but cargo planes? Where are the dead passengers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. the thing with disinformation
is that more often then not it is a mix of truth and lies.
Not all lihop/mihop theories claim that there were no passengers on the planes.

The question "Why have we not seen the videos of the actual plane crashing into the building?"
tells you nothing about whether or not there were passengers on the plane. There may have been passengers on the plane, and then it's still a legitimate question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sorry, Ungmoose, this sounds like a DVD of RW disinformation designed
to make folks viewing it look like "conspiracy theorists." It's too far out even for this DU "tinfoilhatter" to believe.

The real facts of 9/11 are bad enough without talk about missles and planes being disguised. If this gets passed around it will deflect some of the honest questions being raised by Farenheit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I know this all sounds nuts, but let me ask this question
If you were going to plan the worst attack ever to hit the U.S. you would want to make it so horrific that no one would ever want to believe that it was the result of a conspiracy. By the way remember what was written down by the neocons in the PNAC. It was clearly stated that it would take a massive attack on the U.S. to convince the American people to support preemptive war. I think this is the real smoking gun here. There was a documented motive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It would require too much work and possibility of discovery. It's
Edited on Wed Aug-04-04 11:17 PM by KoKo01
incredible enough that the whole plan worked out causing the devastation it did without having to have more accomplices planting bombs or disguising planes.

The design of the WTC Towers was faulty. Not enough asbestos protection on the steel beams and the structure had flaws that caused the things to come down when the temperature was high enough. That makes sense because they build "on the cheap" when they can, and both towers were the first of their kind ever built, so who knows what flaws they may have had in the design.

The pentagon plane story has been around and been debunked over and over. It's just too hard to cover up a plane hitting the pentagon. Complicity by the newsmedia (bad as they are, they weren't as wacked out in 2001 and they've become since) and all the folks required to cover up bombs, missles and planes would have meant someone would have leaked.

That's the best I can answer. But, I worry as I said that promoting this DVD could be fodder for the folks who want to hush up all the other questions about 9/11 and the intelligence failures, plus the LIHOP/MIHOP/PNAC connection and BFEE involvement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. Pentagon Claim Debunked on Snopes
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

The
notion that the Pentagon was not damaged by terrorists who hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 (a Boeing 757) and crashed it into the military office complex, but that the whole affair was staged by the U.S. government, has been promulgated by French author Thierry Meyssan in his book, The Frightening Fraud. Meyssan offers no real explanation for what did cause the extensive damage to the Pentagon, asserting only that Flight 77 did not exist, no plane crashed into the Pengaton, and that "the American government is lying."

Unfortunately, the appeal of conspiracy theories has resulted in widespread dissemination of Meyssan's "theory" in France and the USA, particularly in web sites that mirror his work. As Le Nouvel Observateur noted: "This theory suits everyone - there are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."

The text cited in the example above comes from a Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions! web site, one of the English-language mirrors of Meyssan's claims, where readers are invited to ponder a series of questions about why photographs of the damaged Pentagon seemingly show no evidence of a crashed airplane. The answers to the questions are:



1) Can you explain how a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour only damaged the outside of the Pentagon?
Despite the appearances of exterior photographs, the Boeing 757-200 did not "only damage the outside of the Pentagon." It caused damage to all five rings (not just the outermost one) after penetrating a reinforced, 24-inch-thick outer wall. As 60 Minutes II reported in their "Miracle of the Pentagon" episode on 28 November 2001, the section of the Pentagon into which the hijacked airliner was flown had just been reinforced during a renovation project:


"We made several modifications to the building as part of that renovation that we think helped save people's lives," says Lee Evey, who runs a billion-dollar project to renovate the Pentagon. They’ve been working on it since 1993. The first section was five days from being finished when the terrorists hit it with the plane.
The renovation project built strength into the 60-year-old limestone exterior with a web of steel beams and columns.

"You have these steel tubes and, again, they go from the first floor and go all the way to the fifth floor," says Evey. "We have everything bolted together in a strong steel matrix. It supports and encases the windows and provides tremendous additional strength to the wall."

When the plane hit at 350 miles an hour, the limestone layer shattered. But inside, those shards of stone were caught by a shield of cloth that lines the entire section of the building.

It is a special cloth that helps prevent masonry from fragmenting and turning into shrapnel. The cloth is also used to make bullet-resistant vests.

All of this, especially the steel, held up the third, fourth and fifth floors. They stayed up for 35 minutes. You can see them through the smoke, suspended over the hole gouged by the jet. Only after the evacuation did the heat melt the new steel away. Evey says that without the reconstruction, the floors might have collapsed immediately.

Exterior photographs are misleading because they show only the intact roof structures of the outer rings and don't reveal that the plane penetrated all the way to the ground floor of the third ring. As a U.S. Army press release noted back on 26 September 2001, one engine of the aircraft punched a 12-foot hole through the wall of the second ring:


On the inside wall of the second ring of the Pentagon, a nearly circular hole, about 12-feet wide, allows light to pour into the building from an internal service alley. An aircraft engine punched the hole out on its last flight after being broken loose from its moorings on the plane. The result became a huge vent for the subsequent explosion and fire. Signs of fire and black smoke now ring the outside of the jagged-edged hole.
Recall that when the first airliner was flown into a World Trade Center tower on September 11 — before it was known that the "accident" was really part of a deliberate terrorist attack — newscasters were speculating that a small plane had accidentally flown into the side of the tower, because the visible exterior damage didn't seem as extensive as what people thought a large airliner would cause. Even though the two airplanes flown into the World Trade Center towers were travelling faster at the time of impact than the Pentagon plane was (400 MPH vs. 350 MPH), hit aluminum-and-glass buildings rather than reinforced concrete walls, and didn't dissipate much of their energy striking the ground first (as the Pentagon plane did), they still barely penetrated all the way through the WTC towers.

Below is a recent (11 March 2002) photograph of the the rebuilding effort underway at the Pentagon, demonstrating that far more than just the "outside" of the building was damaged and needed to be repaired:


As eyewitnesses described and photographs demonstrate, the hijacked airliner dived so low as it approached the Pentagon that it actually hit the ground first, thereby dissipating much of the energy that might otherwise have caused more extensive damage to the building; nonetheless, as described by The New York Times, the plane still hit not "just the ground floor" but between the first and second floors:


The Boeing 757 crashed into the outer edge of the building between the first and second floors, "at full power," Mr. Rumsfeld said. It penetrated three of the five concentric rings of the building.
Another account of the crash described:


The plane banked sharply and came in so low that it clipped light poles. It slammed into the side of the Pentagon at an estimated 350 miles per hour after first hitting the helipad. The plane penetrated the outer three rings of the building. The jet fuel exploded, which sent a fireball outward from the impact point. About 30 minutes after the crash, a cross-section of the building collapsed, but only after enough time had elapsed for rescue workers to evacuate all injured employees.
The fire was so hot that firefighters could not approach the impact point itself until approximately 1 P.M. The collapse and roof fires left the inner courtyard visible from outside through a gaping hole. The area hit by the plane was newly renovated and reinforced, while the areas surrounding the impact zone were closed in preparation for renovation, so the death toll could have been much higher if another area had been hit.

Next question:


3) You'll remember that the aircraft only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon's first ring. Can you find debris of a Boeing 757-200 in this photograph?
You'll recall from the discussions above that the hijacked airliner did not "only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon's first ring" — it struck the Pentagon between the first and second floors and blasted all the way through to the third ring. Because the plane disappeared into the building's interior after penetrating the outer ring, it was not visible in photographs taken from outside the Pentagon. Moreover, since the airliner was full of jet fuel and was flown into thick, reinforced concrete walls at high speed, exploding in a fireball, any pieces of wreckage large enough to be identifiable in after-the-fact photographs taken from a few hundred feet away burned up in the intense fire that followed the crash (just as the planes flown into the World Trade Center towers burned up, and the intensity of their jet-fuel fires caused both towers to collapse).

Small pieces of airplane debris were plainly visible on the Pentagon lawn in other photographs, however, such as the one below:


4) Can you explain why the Defence Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?
The claim that the "Defence Secretary" ordered the lawn to be sanded over is false. A base of sand and gravel was laid on the Pentagon lawn because the trucks and other heavy equipment used to haul away the debris (as shown in the photograph below) would have been slipping and sliding on the grass and become mired in the Pentagon lawn otherwise.

5) Can you explain what happened to the wings of the aircraft and why they caused no damage?
As the front of the Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, the outer portions of the wings likely snapped during the initial impact, then were pushed inward towards the fuselage and carried into the building's interior; the inner portions of the wings probably penetrated the Pentagon walls with the rest of the plane. Any sizable portions of the wings were destroyed in the explosion or the subsequent fire. Nonetheless, damage to the building caused by the plane's wings is plainly visible in photographs, such as the one below (note the blackened sections on both sides of the impact site):


6) Can you explain why the County Fire Chief could not tell reporters where the aircraft was?
The exact quote offered here was:


When asked by a journalist: "Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?"
"First of all, the question about the aircraft, there are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior during this fire-fighting operation I'm talking about, but not large sections. In other words, there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing." "You know, I'd rather not comment on that. We have a lot of eyewitnesses that can give you better information about what actually happened with the aircraft as it approached. So we don't know. I don't know."

The fire chief wasn't asked "where the aircraft was"; he was asked "Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?" He did indeed provide an answer to the question he was asked: There were no large sections of the plane left by the time he was asked (the day after the attack) because they had been smashed into smaller pieces by the impact and then burned up; all that remained were smaller pieces visible only from the interior of the Pentagon.


7) Can you find the aircraft's point of impact?
Immediately after Flight 77 smashed into the Pentagon, the impact was obscured by a huge fireball, explosions, fire, smoke, and water from firefighting efforts. Within a half hour, the upper stories of the building collapsed, thereby permanently obscuring the impact site. It simply wasn't possible for photographs to capture a clear view of the impact site during that brief interval between the crash and the collapse.

In photographs like the one provided (below left), the impact site is obscured by water from firefighters' hoses and smoke. A two-story high impact hole does exist right behind the fireman in the photograph, but it's covered over by water issuing from the fire truck.

By the time the smoke and water cleared, additional portions of the building had collapsed (below right), further obscuring the impact point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. A private plane just crashed into a concrete wall of a home in Austin TX.
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 01:51 AM by Dover
If you look at the picture of the house, there is no sign of the plane. It dissintegrated because it was full of fuel and became a fire ball. The impact area looks very much like the Pentagon did.
Identification of both the plane and the passengers was very difficult (although there were other sources for that info and eye witnesses).




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. no sign of the plane?
then what's that pile of burned rubble?

you know, this isn't the first time an airplane crashes and bursts into flame. it would however be one of very few cases (the other case being the pentagon crash) where the plane nearly completely "disintagrated" due to fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. "airliner hit the ground first"
then how come the lawn in front of the location of impact doesn't have a scratch? (as shown in several photos taken before that part of the lawn was covered with sand and grit)
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/9-11/pentagon.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. 10,000 Pound Elephant.
Where are all those people then? Assume for a second that there really is a conspiracy and that 9/11 was staged. Wouldn't it have just been a lot easer to allow some militant hijackers from Saudi Arabia to fly planes into the WTC and Pentagon instead of orchestrating a massive hoax in which you have to

1. Kidnap and then hide the bodies of hundreds of people

2. Crash and Hide 4 commercial airliners (which are quite expensive...i don't think an airline would take lightly to one of their planes disappearing)

and

3. Somehow keep all of this from the public (yes i know this would be the easiest part)

I'm sorry, but this is bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. I've never heard an explanation
of how hundreds of people on the roads and metro who saw the American Airlines plane fly over, snap lightposts, and smash into the building were duped into believing they saw an American Airlines plane fly over, snap lightposts, and smash into the building when it secretly was a missile bearing no resemblance to an American Airlines plane flying over, snapping lightposts, and smashing into the building.

Until the story of those hundreds of witnesses can be duped into claiming to have seen the American Airlines plane fly over, snap lightposts, and smash into the building, can be explained, I'l have to believe that an American Airlines plane flew over, snapped light posts and flew into the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Some people saw TWO planes fly towards the pentagon, btw
Eyewitnesses sitting on 395 in gridlock (hiway that overlooks pentagon). I remember hearing them during our local (dc area) coverage. After that, it was always just 1 plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. The first plane
Someone posted things about 9/11 in the lounge and I forgot about this video. I posted the link there, but I thought I would post it here also.
I saw this a while back when I was watching the video of the first plane hitting. When I first saw it, it looked like something hit just below the first plane right before the plane hits. I showed it to a few people back then and they agreed and found it interesting.
After seeing the threads today I went and found the video. It looks like there is a flash or something right before the plane makes contact. Watch it and see if you see anything. Just saying....

http://www.september-11th.us/Video-14.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC