|
Edited on Fri Aug-06-04 09:26 PM by BevHarris
I just interviewed with a Florida newspaper about the stress election officials are reporting. He mentioned Michael Moore's upcoming Florida election visit, terrorism threats, and citizen "infiltrators."
Well, Michael Moore can't visit everywhere at once, so I don't see the problem. He can't come into the polling place anyway. But maybe they're worried about being caught in the act of covering up problems, as happened recently by some other filmmakers I know.
And terrorism? Apparently they had a little seminar with the police department. But does anyone realistically think that a polling place would be a sensible terrorism target? I mean, let's do the math: In my county there are 1,000 polling places. There are 3,066 counties. Okay, some have only 100 polling places or so, but we are talking what -- a million polling places nationwide? Seems too dispersed for any kind of terrorism strategy.
Now about the "citizen infiltrators." Yes, and I've also heard this referred to as a "Jihad" (really!) and as a "holy war." Okay, those over the top remarks were by San Bernardino County (CA) Registrar Scott Konopasek. But this term "infiltrator" really galls me.
I asked what in the world they mean by "infiltrator" and what they are really scared of is poll workers and election judges who do the terrible dastardly thing of reporting to others about their experiences after the polls close. They also seem to feel it adds "stress" and "demotivates voters" if we have citizens observing. Now, forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't this exactly why we have ordinary citizens in these roles in the first place?
The reporter said the election officials are concerned about all the extra forms they have to fill out with poll workers. I asked what those forms are. Get this:
1) A sign off that they actually received their training and 2) A loyalty statement that they will not engage in partisan skullduggery on the job.
Again, forgive me if I'm missing something here, but isn't this something they should already have been doing? Sounds reasonable to me, especially after traveling the country and seeing how slipshod some places are (like San Diego, which didn't even check poll workers ID and then sent them home with voting machines).
He asked me for my comment about the stress the election officials must endure due to all the increased citizen monitoring. My comment?
"Tough." I think after we've all had these goofy voting system shoved down our throats, we deserve to exert a little muscle.
And by the way, some election officials complain that they can't get enough volunteers -- but now that we have, among the 10 or so groups doing monitoring, something like 100,000 people wanting to be involved in monitoring elections, I guess they don't really want people involved after all, do they?
This is a healthy thing. It is always uncomfortable for people who are not accustomed to being scrutinized and being held accountable to get more attention. But the good ones -- like one of my sources, a former elections supervisor who baked cookies for people to try to get them to attend the Logic & Accuracy tests -- don't really mind.
I say, "bring it on."
To volunteer for the fall election watch crew at Black Box Voting, email me at bevharrismail@aol.com.
We have a coordinating meeting this weekend, will hook up with other groups, will begin putting you all in action shortly.
Bev Harris
|