Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KRUGMAN vs O'REILLY Smackdown, CNBC, 7 P.M. ET

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:58 PM
Original message
KRUGMAN vs O'REILLY Smackdown, CNBC, 7 P.M. ET
Will re-run at 10 P.M. and 1 A.M.

*******QUOTE*******

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44149-20...

.... Fox News Channel's chief talking head was invited to "chat" with Paul Krugman, New York Times columnist and author of "The Great Unraveling," after one of the "Tim Russert Show" producers learned that O'Reilly had issued a challenge to any New York Times reporter or columnist to engage in a debate with him. ....

According to a transcript of their "conversation," a copy of which was given to the TV Column, it was everything you'd expect.

O'Reilly called Krugman a "quasi-socialist"; Krugman called that "slander" and said if he is a quasi-socialist then O'Reilly is a "quasi-murderer"; O'Reilly pronounced Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" a bit of "Nazi propaganda" that reinforced all of Krugman's "paranoid delusions"; Krugman insisted Moore's flick was "flawed" but was made by "a guy who really does love this country"; Russert hardly got a word in edgewise; and a good time was had by all. One of those exchanges that make you so proud to be a journalist.

During their give and take -- okay, maybe it's more accurate to say push and shove, or slap and smack -- O'Reilly would periodically accuse Krugman of not letting him get in a sentence, or words to that effect.

So we counted and, according to The Washington Post TV Team Transcript Tally, O'Reilly actually got in 321 sentences during the "debate," to Krugman's 258.

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. just tuned in
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. the link seems to be broken...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
On now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Two observers and commentators..." Saith G.E. RUSSERT
R: "Mr K., You say George (Shrub) is a RADICAL. Why RADICAL?"

K: "They want to get rid of things like Medicare. Look at Tom DeLAY."

O: "They want a small government. Don't trust (who?). But I'm not here to defend the Shrub (mal-)admin. I want everybody to know that. ....It's supply side. The economy is coming (way) back..."

K: "We've had 3 terrible years on jobs. One (smaller) year. Not true that we're back where we started."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. K: "That's a Lie."
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:11 PM by UTUSN
(About O saying PK "wrote column after column saying the Shrub tax cuts would lead to recession".)

O: "DON'T CALL ME A LIAR, PAL!"

K: "I said the tax cuts were INEFFICTIVE."

O: "9-11 did it NOT HAPPEN??? DID IT NOT HAPPEN???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. O'Reilly is already lying
about Krugman book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. LOL
Paul just called O'Reilly a

LIAR!!!!!!!!

OReilly is losing it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Paul: This is not your show, you can't cut my mike
ROFL!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
112. That was the funniest thing I
ever saw. I never see o'riley so I am not familiar with his stupid style tonight was an eye opener. Timmy was rather subdued. Maybe he is thinking am I that bad? Yes timmy you are. The liberal talk shows really made me laugh out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Krugman to O'Reilly
"This is not your show so you can't cut off my mike" priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That really got under O'Reilly's skin!
Loved it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. K: "This is not your show. You can't cut my mic."
O: "THAT'S A CHEAP SHOT. THAT'S WHAT YOU DO, YOU'RE A CHEAP SHOT ARTIST!"



LOLLLLL, O'Whorely is such a DENIAL psychopath. He's LOST it twice already. PK is cool and collected.

Going to break. Haha, G.E.RUSSERT has spoken 1 or 2 sentences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothic Sponge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hate O'Reilly!
He makes me ill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh yeah I'm watching now
missed the first part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andyjunction Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. O'Reilly trying to be physically intimidating
he looked like he was going to take a swing at Krugman for a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:16 PM
Original message
I thought he wasgoing to hit him too
I wish I'd been sitting there...I'd have fire his ass up for pointing his finger at me !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh! "Bush does stuff he doesn't really want to do"
But I'm not here to defend him or anything. lololol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Geeze! Krugman! Why go into that "whorefest!" I've seen Krugman and
he never comes off good in these "entertainment RW Whore Fests!" Why the hell did his publisher send him out there???

Krugman is a "reasoned thoughtful person" up against Media and Idiot Idealogues! He can never hope to look good no matter what he says. These folks don't "listen!" They are like the C-Span call in's who've been given their "talking points" and "walking points."

I have a brother who is exactly an O'Reilly. He doesn't listen...he will carve you up into pieces and leave you wondering why you weren't "good enough" to convince him.

Paul...give it up...don't make yourself look like a "weenie" when you ARE NOT!!! It's not worth it! They don't listen...they don't even HEAR YOU! They WILL NOT BUY YOUR BOOK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Krugman is kicking O'Reilly's butt on FACTS
Of course, if you have already drunk the cool-aid, you don't listen to facts anyway. Bill just pulled the socialism canard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. The viewers of this show HAVE already drunk the Kool-Aid! Give it Up!
I admire Krugman for trying...but beating one's head against a brick wall to sell a book..goes beyond the pale for me.

Krugman is too important to "whore himself" for his publisher like this...REALLY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. PK Is Doing GREAT - Cool, Collected. Needs to Talk More n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. sometimes I really don't get you?
give it up?

WHY???!!!!

He's destroying O'Reilly with FACTS.

And he just sits back at let O'Reilly show everyone who an out of control loon he really is.

I could subscribe to your theory if this was O'Reilly's turf -- but it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Cat...I have a bias. My brother is an O'Reilly clone...Krugman doesn't
ever do well on these shows. I LOVE KRUGMAN! I don't watch Cable, but I see DU alerts when there's something I should watch. I've caught (I believe) all of Krugman's few appearances. His performance is too nuanced and intelligent for these shows.

Does that answer your concerns about "where I come from." If you had a brother like O'Reilly...you might understand. I hope with all my heart you have NO ONE in your family like that Devil from Hell!

Okay? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:30 PM
Original message
Maybe I'm wrong here, but doesn't O'Reilly think EVERYONE is Socialist?
Isn't that the Repug Mantra? SOCIALIST, SOCIALIST, SOCIALIST...when it comes to us Dems? Maybe I missed something along the last 30 years...but I think Socialist would be incribed on my boobs if I listened to the Repugs all that time. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
77. Brit Hume is slightly conservative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #77
139. You know....like Rick James is slightly dead
and O'Really is slightly full of shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. States can't spend money on "No Child Left Behind"
What BS. NCLB is totally underfunded. Krugman is now kicking ass on taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. this is too good !!
hope it gets coverage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothic Sponge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Quick! We need to raise taxes here in New York!
This way O'Reilly will leave radio! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. O: "I am a guy who says both parties want to buy votes."
K: "Why the tax cuts for the people least going to spend."

O: "I worked my buns off. And you two probably do, too."

R: "You think we're under taxed."

K: "Because there are certain things we want....sustain the programs we want like Medicare and (), the programs middle class Americans depend on."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. O'weeny is so out of his depth
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:18 PM by party_line
He does some anecdotal schtick then Paul rolls out MASSIVE facts.

He's just toying with bill.

O: I'm Mr Self-Reliant, he's Mr Big Govt (famous temper rising)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alleycat Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Pathetic
This is just pathetic. What ever happened to journalistic integrity. I know they are not journalists!! It reminds me of a side show. As a society we are getting closer and closer to the "running man" with the reality TV boom, talking heads on the radio and news only spewing their opinions. Help us all!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Welcome to DU Alleycat
:hi: That last "rant" O'Reilly went on was just classic. Talk about a filibuster. Krugman was just rolling his eyes in disgust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. What do you mean? Krugman's journalistic integrity is BEAMING!
Or are you just commenting on O'reilly?

Welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alleycat Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
116. Just O'Rielly
I was speaking about just him but seriously why do we even bother he is so nuts what the point of trying to debate with someone as off the wall as him!!! Never mind I just answered my own question, lets make hime look as crazy as he sounds!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. O'Reilly is losing it!!!
he's yelling and flailing all over the place.

Paul is cool, calm, and looking at him like he's a lunatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. O'Reilly Is Such A Fucking Pitbull
He goees for the throat from the get go.

I like how he said "paul krugman was a very smart man" Yeah get that out of the way - so it justifies your stupidity. The college professor vs the fuck right-wing talk show host .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. Will this be repeated?
My husband is a major HUGE fan of Krugman but, he's working til 10:00 p.m. Thanks :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Yes at 9:00 central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Thank you... love!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothic Sponge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. I never watch O'Reilly
Is socialism the new evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. O: "You are A SOCIALIST." R Let Him Rant on. Went to Break.
I know the breaks are pre-destined, but it sure looks like O'Whorely is at a meltdown point when miraculously G.E.RUSSERT calls a break. PK hasn't had a chance to defend against the "socialist" word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. LOL
Paul called O'Reilly a "quasi murderer"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
34. K: "If I'm a socialist, that's a slander. "
O: "I said QUASI."

K: "Then you're a quasi murderer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. Oh my.
That was soooooooo sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
36. Oh really said "Iraq a mistake" them slams onto "you think * lied "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. O: You still beatin' that drum? No, you're very clever.
*Egypt has come out and said he never told Franks about WMD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
39. O: "Everybody knows the Iraq war was a screw-up."
O: "Are you saying that (Shrub) LIED."

K: "I'm not using that word. He knew what he wanted to hear and people were willing to tell him what he wanted."

O: "No, you won't use that word. You're good at language..."

K: "Well, so is (Shrub)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. O can't do anything but aim personal barbs!
Each rebuttal is answered with a personal retort. Memo to O: stick with shows where you can cut the mic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bill is making a fool of himself (as usual)
First he admits that invading Iraq was a major screwup, then he spends the rest of his rant defending Bush's decision. What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
44. K: "Knight Ridder was talking to the analysts (in Iraq) off the record
at the time. The analysts were saying, we are under immense pressure to find WMD."

O: "No, you're SMARTER than everybody else."



O'Whorely does nothing but PERSONALLY ATTACK. Yep, break time again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothic Sponge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
46. I love Krugman but
i'd love to see Mike Malloy and O'Reilly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
47. O'Reilly....................
is losing it. He can't handle a give and take conversation. If he cannot dominate the discussion he get's all huffy and start's throwing insults around. He has a VERY short fuse and has no business being in the talk show game. He can't take criticism and acts like a spoliled baby when anyone else trys to voice thier opinions. Gee, who else does that remind you of? I think there's a certain guy illegally squatting in the White House with the same character faults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
48. R: "What about the nuclear cloud. Was that hyping?"
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 07:21 PM by UTUSN
O: "I never bought that. But let me go back, we left one thing out: BILL CLINTON thought we had WMD."

R: "Let me go to O'R's question. If you have all these people telling you these things are there, do you have an obligation to act."

K: "We had an obligation to get the inspectors in. And the inspectors where THERE."

O: "I know you know more than all of us do. BLIX came on my show and said they aren't letting us talk to the scientists. France and Russia were getting BRIBED."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. er... wtheck?
Russia and France were getting bribed? Sorry Bill - just exposed yourself to the viewers that are not as big of whack jobs as your usual fans - how crazy/conspiratorial and nonsensical you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
49. Total lies about the inspectors and Hans Blix
They were interviewing scientists and going pretty much anywhere they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
50. OReilly cracks me up.
He is so typical of the RW in that he can't get through his speech without at least one personal insult.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. One personal insult would be a milestone for O'Reilly.
His entire "debating" style consists of loud volumes, erratic gestures, and ad hominem attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. Krugman just put O'Reilly in his place
regarding his threatening posture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
51. K: "About France being bribed, that comes from CHALABI."
O: "Your paper did 40 Abu Grarib stories but you haven't done any on the bribe."

-------so of course G.E.RUSSERT cuts off KRUGMAN and goes back to O for another monolog (NYT slants against Shrub).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
53. O'Reilly is such SLIME!!!
He can't say anything with throwing a personal insult in with it. What a control freak. I REALLY REALLY hate this asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #53
137. I'd love to punch the bastard out...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
54. Tiny spark from Krugman, there
saying the "NYT has *nothing* to do with what goes in my column"

He didn't like that implication flung by O

"The Krugman wing..." O snarls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
55. O'reilly is a Vile Prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
57. O'Really is soooooo intimidated by Krugman.
He keeps saying he knows Krugman is SMARTER than all the rest of us.

Ha ha ha ha ha, he knows Krugman is way more intelligent than O'Really will ever be. This illustrates very succinctly the Republican rejection and fear of intelligence and intellectualism.

"It's kinda hard to have a reasonable discussion here." Ain't that the truth, Paul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:39 PM
Original message
Paul's a saint.
It's like before they went on, someone suggested he treat O as he would treat a misbehaving 7 year old nephew in public or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. I bet O'Really still wets the bed. He's such
a freakin baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #57
117. Hey Billy - if Paul Krugman is so smart...
Bill - if Paul Krugman is so smart, why do you disagree with him so much?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
59. Whoa
They almost came to blows there. Bill really hates Al Franken. I love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
60. O: "You're appearing with STUART SMALLEY
AND YOU'LL PERSONNALLY ATTACK ME and you'll LIE ABOUT ME. And I RESENT THAT."


K: "Well, we resent you, too. ...You know, it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion."

O: "*I* think it's reasonable. RUSSERT would throw me out if it weren't."

K: "Would he? I don't think so."---------LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #60
84. B.O. would have simply thrived wearing a brown shirt
downing mugs of suds in the beerhalls of Nazi Germany. I want to rip his guts out! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
61. That was fabulous Oh really totally imploded
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:41 PM by proud patriot
Wheeeeeeeeeeee! Al Franken has sure gotten under his Skin ..
Al's somewhere laughing at this very moment LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. Is it continuing in the second half of the hour?
or is the segment over?

Its entertaining just reading about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. OReilly is the ultimate pot calling the kettle black.
"You are VILE SCUM because you are GOING TO attack me personally!!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. His tone was so childish. He's a twit!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
66. the ?W Revue tribute to Bill...
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:43 PM by nostamj
...this gets a HUGE hand in our "media medley"

To the tune of “Bill Baily”

YOU’RE JUST A CLOWN O’REILLY
BILL, PLEASE SIT DOWN!
WE’RE DIZZY FROM YOUR SPINNING!

YOU LET AL FRANKEN BAIT YOU
AND PLAYED THE FOOL
THE DEVIL GOT HIS DUE

THE POMPOUS PRETENTIOUS RAVINGS
THAT MAKE UP YOUR SHTICK
IS JUST ANOTHER RIGHT WING RANT
YOUR SHOW ON FOX–
JON STEWART MOCKS
O’REILLY WON’T YOU PLEASE SHUT UP

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
67. GOD.....................
I'd like to get O'Reilly one on one in a fucking alley. I'd slap the taste out of his mouth. He acts like such a big, tough man. He's a fucking whimp who's only weapon is a big gapeing maw and the ability to cut off people's mics. I hate that fuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #67
140. Watching "Outfoxed" and the scene where he rips Jeremy Glick
who lost his father on 9/11 and committed (in O'Really's mind) the unpardonable sin of opposing the war is too much. Then, he has the utter gall to bring up Glick's mother, a grieving widow at this time. Glick is a better man than me...if that was me, I would reached over the table and ripped his goddamn throat out for even mentioning my mother.

This man is a gutless pig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
68. Watch O'reilly, What Arrogance.
He is a total nazi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
69. Now talking about F9/11
Krugman listing all the things bush used 9/11
to pass tax cuts etc.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
70. O: "Krugman's paraniod delusions"
Now lying about F9/11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
71. no cable here - please tell me PK is laughing at this jackass
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:47 PM by vidali
thanks for the terrific thread for the cable-free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #71
82. Yes he seems to be enjoying himself
he's smiling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
72. K: (wrote) (Shrub) exploited a national tragedy for political gain.
K: "I don't know how anybody NOT believe that. I kept getting calls (from Congress) saying they (Shrubbites) are demanding (this or that, capital gains) because of 9-11."

O: "Richard CLARKE is a flat out... the most vivid example. I don't know how any respectable journalist can say that propaganda has VALUE."

K: "Fox does it all the time."

O: "ANOTHER CHEAP SHOT. That's a CHEAP SHOT. ...I sat there (Election night 2000) sitting there and you said Fox News skewed the election results."

K: "You have said over and over that (Shrub) would have won Florida under every recount model. Not true. (Reads AP saying otherwise)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
73. Krugman: This is the modern world, just google it
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
74. OMG Krugman breaking out his notes.
KILLING O'Really with FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Arguing over the Florida recount. Krugman truthfully states if recount was conducted under the way Gore requested, Bush would have won. Under EVERY OTHER STANDARD applied, GORE would have won.

O'Really tries to lie and say Krugman isn't right. Krugman tells people to go do their own research and find out the facts for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
75. O: Addressing shut up, shut up
and lying about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
88. Why did he think his example was a good one?
Why should it be ok for him to have told the guy to shut up about his sexuality? If they'd left that in, he'd have looked *worse*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
76. K: "(Faux) takes marching orders from the right wing, Repub party."
O: "PK embraces propaganda of the worst kind. That's why I have such little respect for him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. little kettle calling here, eh bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #76
89. O: "It is unbelievable because YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT"
RE: Is Faux conservative spin.

O'WHORELY has talked for two minutes. PK gets only to shake his head and mutter "unbelievable".

O'WHORELY said that if you go down the Faux line-up, VAN SUSTERN is a Liberal; COLMES is a Liberal; HANNITY is a wingnut Fascist pig (paraphrasing here); "I'm a TRADITIONALIST, and Shep SMITH is really nothing. He's NOTHING."

G.E. RUSSERT, "I'll give you a chance to respond after the break, PK."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. K: "You lied about Michael MOORE and denied it on the same program."
O: "You have a date?"

K: "Yes, June 28 on the radio."

K: "About the convention coverage. You didn't even cover the JK speech."

O: "Where did you get that June date. MEDIA MATTERS. You might as well Call FIDEL. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, Mister Propaganda."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #89
126. load of shit
OReilly- Conservative
Hannity- Conservative
Colmes- moderate
Van Sustern- who cares, all she covers is laci crap
Hume- Conservative
Barnes- Conservative
Kondracke- slightly to the left of center
Krauthammer- conservative
Shep Smith- conservative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
79. O: Faux puts on more LIBERALS
than CONS....

the black hole has opened!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. Prove it Bill - pull the numbers - for a given week
it would be interesting to see what happens when you have to come back with FACTS to back up your wild and completely hypothetical claims that you assert as fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
80. O: "We put on more liberals than conservatives"
What a joke! This guy is delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothic Sponge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
81. This just in:
Fox News has more liberals! Who would have known with all the nazis there!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteDemocratic2004 Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
83. O'Liely's comments are 8th grade school yard bully tactics
The POS can't debate he can only call names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
85. 'Faux has on more liberals than any other channel' O'reilly bwhahahahahah
bhwhahahahahahahawhwhbhbhbhbhehwhwhwhwhwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahbwahahahah:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #85
90. Wasn't that rich?
I almost fell out of my chair. If O'R really believes this he's the most self delusional SOB on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
91. This is HILARIOUS!
Saying Krugman uses left-wing research.

O'Really is LOSING IT!!!!! Screaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #91
96. Media Matters just prints quotes from transcripts.
How does O get propaganda from that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. He called it propaganda, but AGREED he made the statement!
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 07:00 PM by Tatiana
Is something propaganda if it is true? O'Really, in fact, legitimized Media Matters as being accurate regarding his comments. His beef was with the fact that Krugman had the nerve to challenge his opinion.

Typical Repuke. Traditionalist my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothic Sponge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #96
108. Because anything that points out the truth....
has to be spun as "liberal hate."

Unreal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
92. "Why don't you just call Fidel!!!"
OMG!!! O'Reilly is losing it over mediamatters.org!!!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
94. O'R is completely INSANE
and has made an utter and absolute (further) ASS of himself

MEDIA MATTERS MEDIA MATTERS I SHOULD CALL THE KKK!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #94
102. I must agree.......completely NUTS!!! He needs meds.
I'm sure you all noticed how he would raise his voice and use body language to intimidate P.K. I think P.K. could kick his ass!! Be very careful of those quiet Professorial types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #102
146. Remember Franken's book: Lying, Splotchy Bully? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
95. Watching O'Reilly is like watching the worst Shakespearean actor ever
Recite the "Turner Diaries."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #95
104. O'REILLY Is Seriously Psychologically Disturbed
and I believe that. He is thisclose to having a psychotic break. And yet, with his penny pinching self-promotion he DEMANDS that PK go on HIS show (where he WILL have control of the mic). And will call him "coward" if he won't go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
97. O'really is seriously out of his mind - like he was totally scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
98. O'Reilly just completely lost it
Slinging around the communist word. Media Matters is a "hate group"? O'Reilly totally unbelievable. Someone needs to feed him some anti-psychotic drugs. It would improve his disposition immeasurably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
99. Even a Pacifist Would Love To Kick The Shit Out Of That Guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
100. O: "OH! MEDIA MATTERS! OH HO! SEE?!"
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 06:58 PM by Cat Atomic
Uh... so the fuck what? Did you say it or not, Bill? What difference does it make who hosted the clips?

He's such a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #100
106. The Mediamatters.org hysteria was the funniest part
who would have thought that Fidel had such a strong foothold in the attemtps to overturn Mr O's Supreme reign? it's shocking I tell you! Shocking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
103. I love the way Krugman handles O'Rielly.
The big bully is used to having people back down. Krugman with his facts and calm demeanor really pisses him off, and I am enjoying watching him in potential heart attack mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
105. Russert sucks as a host.
B.O. got more time and Russert never once told him to tone down his bully stupidty act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #105
109. He thinks the screaming is informative
and that it adds drama. I'm sure Timmy, the squire of Nantucket, will be smiling all the way to the bank. After all, it was his hard work and good preparation that made tonight's show a success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #105
110. keep it simple
RUSSERT SUCKS. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #105
111. I don't think he did OReilly any favors by giving him more time.
He just looked like a maniac. I don't think many people just starting to pay attention to politics who tuned into this show would be persuaded by his performance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #111
128. I agree. O'Liely is his own worse enemy.
He is a raging idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #105
119. Eh
Russert was fair and Krugman held his own. I say let O'Reilly make an ass out of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #105
134. Russert looked like he could hardly wait till the show was over...
...so he could go get drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #134
142. wait?
he looked half-in-the-bag during the show. Aside from grumpy plugs for Krugman and O'Really's books before each break, he looked pretty detached and in a kind of stupor. Perhaps that Plame deposition didn't go as well as he hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #105
138. I Expected Better of Russert - Stupid Me
OR went after PK from the get go - and Russert just sat there like a lump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
107. Ya'll have got to catch the repeat of this show
oh really imploded upon himself and is now
a steaming pile of hate ...Wheeeee !
it was fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #107
113. It repeats at 10 eastern
Additional Airings
Date Time Channel VCR Plus+
Sat, 7 10:00 PM 36 CNBC 4700262
Sun, 8 1:00 AM 36 CNBC 7046137
Sat, 14 7:00 PM 36 CNBC 4547795
Sat, 14 10:00 PM 36 CNBC 4546066
Sun, 15 1:00 AM 36 CNBC 7875641
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #113
121. Good lookin out CW.
Everyone who has cable should catch the repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oddtext Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #113
127. mp3/mpeg video?
would someone with cabe be so kind as to post an A/V file of this woefully mismatched debate? i'd love to see/hear it! perhaps we'll see something similar in JFK v. * later this year :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #127
143. I second, third, and fourth that request.
Please, please, please?

I want to hear it for my ownself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #107
114. Thank you all for making it so real for us w/o cable!
!:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
115. Best Line: "I'm a traditionalist"
What the fuck does that mean? LOL!

"I'm not conservative ... I'm a 'traditionalist." O'Reilly ... you're a fucking hoot!

That and, "I didn't tell him to 'shut up' ... I said 'Why don't you just shut up about your sexuality." LOL! He really is a douchebag.

Actually, wait, a douchebag might have some real use ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #115
120. Yeah it was funny how he was complaining
about them cutting the quote short, and the whole quote made him look like just as big a jerk, and he didn't even realize that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skrunch Donating Member (939 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #115
144. If by "traditionalist" O'Reilly means...
...an ignorant loudmouth asshole spewing his intolerance and stupidity around like projectile vomit...then yeah, I'd have to agree...he's a traditionalist alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
118. O'reilly reminds me of a drunk bully.
Go pass out in your own vomit, ya asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
122. Thanks for the heads up, but
I could not look at the show. I can't stand O'Rielly.

Thanks to all DU'ers for the blow-by-blow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #122
124. Any psychology professionals out there got any insight into
what kind of mental illness O'Reilly has? I mean, he clearly is deluded. Beyond that, he's egotistical, maniacal, and bullying. Is there a term for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #124
145. Unfortunately, he's not insane...just like 30-40% of the US population.
He's threatened by uncertainty and the nuance of life. Intellectually immature and likely to use denial as a defense mechanism, O'Really is not unlike a huge segment of the population...many of whom are given to buying the "party line" and often succeptable to leaders or organizations that paint the world in "black and white" terms (e.g., fundamentalism, conservative dictums, fascist leaders, etc.).

In O'Really's case, this restricted general world view is combined with a raging narcissistic personality disorder and repressed anger (at god knows what...but likely to have something to do with an authoritarian father and over-indulgent/histrionic mother).

O'Really is just a sad and pathetic person...the best he can hope for is the realization that his life and legacy will be lost to history.

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
123. WHO IS O'REILLY TO DISCUSS ECONOMIC THEORY??? WHAT ARE HIS
QUALIFICATIONS? How much research has he done? What economic theories does he follow? HE IS JUST A BLOWHARD WITH A BIG MOUTH AND A FOSILIZED BRAIN. I cannot stand the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
125. I thought it was going to be a civilized discussion
but Oreilly started in with the shouting and finger pointing fairly quickly. What a turd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #125
130. But why should a DEMOCRATIC person deign O'Reilly with any
opportunity for discussion? HE IS JUST AN IGNORANT YELLER!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
129. Smackdowns are smackdownier the second time around...
Watching the repeat -- this is just too much fun!

... although it would've been nice if Russert's producers had put in a laugh track to support O'Reilly's lunacy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSU_Subversive Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
131. I loved it! PK: "Ok, heeeeeere we go!" <breaks out data>
O'R desperately kept trying to question PK's sources and he was SHOT DOWN every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
132. there must be some people out there who LIKE O'Reilly
that's a sad thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
133. O'Liely was being a total bully and a thug with Krugman...
...Bill is such a jack-boot SS Storm-trooper. His days as a TV commentator are numbered. November 3rd will be Bill O'Liely's last day for his show on Fox based on tonights performance. As for Krugman, he won on all of his points, at least the ones he got in in spite of O'Bully's ranting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Protected Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
135. Krugman stares up at the studio lights
LOL, I probably would have done the same exact thing if I was in his shoes. It's clearly pointless trying to reason with O'Lielly. Tim Russert did a really horrible job moderating this, but that comes at no surprise.

I've got to read Krugman's book now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tosca Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
136. And the right wing opposition
will applaud Oreilly for his forthright victory over the "elite, Northeastern intellectual, pinko" Paul Krugman. You betcha. They will.

Krugman should stick to print. Not TV circus shows.

TV circus shows are for ragin' Cajuns and the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clyde39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
141. How can ANYONE take O'Reilly seriously
It would be impossible to have a "debate" with this person. He is the epitome of obnoxiousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
147. Website for those who haven't already seen it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #147
148. Thanks- I forgot about this. REM's Bassist plugged it on Franken
The interview with Garrison Keillor was classic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
149. it was beautiful to watch, like a matador with a drunken bull
I kept noticing Krugman looking over to Russert with the body language of "see? this guy is nuts!"

I mean, who is stupid enough to debate Krugman on economic theory of tax cuts?

This is the guy who has been honored with the Eccles Prize for Excellence in Economic Writing, the John Bates Clark Medal, the Adam Smith Award, the Nikkei Prize (with M. Fujita and A. Venables), and the Alonso Prize.

Is that the sort of limited economic training background from which O'reilly stems?

Its like Moe Howard arguing with Einstein over physics.

Yeah O'Reilly is a bully. any one of us who has spent enough time bartending can see it instantly. he's the type of drunk who would pick a fight with his own shadow and brag on how he beat it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC