|
prevented, at least the WTC buildings could have been empty. OK Put your tin foil hat on and hear me out.
I watched Sibel Edmonds on 60 Minutes last night and I have read her open letter to the 9/11 Commission Chair. Putting all this together and remembering the events right before and right after 9/11 I had a stunning revelation:
You can toss out the cover story about the FBI wanting Sibel to not translate important documents to create a backlog...trash this story immediately. There was already a backlog of work within the FBI...they had been working hard since the days of Louis Freeh (sp) to create a backlog. They did this by turining all their attention to Whitewater and stabbing Clinton and Reno in their backs. No, the story given to Sibel about wanting to create a backlog is phony and she is unwittingly helping them out by repeating this story.
What the FBI is really covering up is the fact that they indeed had enough information concerning times, places, related events, names and identities of those connected to 9/11 to have either prevented the event entirely or at least to have protected the people who worked in the WTC buildings BEFORE the attack occurred. THINK ABOUT IT!! Weren't you amazed to learn that within a mere 24-48 hours after the attack all 19 highjackers had been identified, their country, their behaviors leading up to 9/11? Was it just me, or did some of you also think that was some fast work ..even for the FBI. Afterall, they couldn't detect a mole working within their ranks for over 10 years. Folks, they could do this, because they already had the information and when they scrambled to translate and pull together all the information they had from all the various sources AFTER 9/11 they discovered that, indeed, they had had all this information all the time but had either overtly or covertly ignored it. So what is worse, to admit to not doing the work in order to create a backlog or to admit that the work was done and completely ignored? Is this the true LIHOP or is it MIHOP? I submit that they knew the information all along..how else could they have so much information about the highjackers (some of whom we know had stolen identities) so quickly? Finding whole books and plans and wallets etc.? You know as well as I do, the stock transactions prior to 9/11, the movement in and out and back into the country prior to 9/11, the events right after 9/11 and the push by this administration to NOT investigate anything surrounding and including 9/11 is mighty brazen but totally easy to do with the brain-dead population that make up the base of Bush supporters.
OK, tell me what you think. The reason they haven't imprisoned Sibel as of yet is because they want her out there telling the piece of the puzzle that she actually knows and is being truthful about...but it's the piece that she doen't know that they are trying to keep hidden.
Will Pitt, Joe Conason, and all you other "investigative journalists" where are you? Are you out there? If so, tell me what you think.
|