Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Porter Goss "Somebody sends me a blue dress and some DNA,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 06:38 AM
Original message
Porter Goss "Somebody sends me a blue dress and some DNA,
I'll have an investigation,"

Bu$h has just named Porter Goss to head the CIA. This fellow is a total partisan tool. Here's his comments about the Plame investigation:



Goss, who was a CIA agent himself from the early 1960s to 1971, said he takes such leaks seriously, but he distinguished between a willful violation of federal law and an inadvertent disclosure.

Goss also said no one from the intelligence agencies has raised the issue with him since syndicated columnist Robert Novak identified the agent in a column July 14.

"I would say there's a much larger dose of partisan politics going on right now than there is worry about national security," said Goss, R-Sanibel. "But I would never take lightly a serious allegation backed up by evidence that there was a willful -- and I emphasize willful, inadvertent is something else -- willful disclosure, and I haven't seen any evidence."

Goss said he would act if he did have evidence of that sort.

"Somebody sends me a blue dress and some DNA, I'll have an investigation," Goss said.


http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2003310030460

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. You nailed it: "total partisan tool"
Consolation prize: he won't be there very long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the update, Bush only fires competent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. OK folks, I know it's early
and most folks don't know who Goss is from a hole in the wall, at least not yet. But by tomorrow, Goss will be a household name.

Here's the LBN thread about Bu$h's nominating him to head the CIA.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x739904




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Porter Goss: Cheney Cat's Paw
Porter Goss: Cheney Cat's Paw

by Ray McGovern
There is, thankfully, a remnant of CIA professionals who still put objective analysis above political correctness and career advancement. Just when they thought there were no indignities left for them to suffer, they are shuddering again at press reports that Rep. Porter Goss (R-Fla.) may soon be their new boss.

That possibility conjures up a painful flashback for those of us who served as CIA analysts when Richard Nixon was president. Chalk it up to our naiveté, but we were taken aback when swashbuckling James Schlesinger, who followed Richard Helms as CIA director, announced on arrival, "I am here to see that you guys don't screw Richard Nixon!" To underscore his point, Schlesinger told us he would be reporting directly to White House political adviser Bob Haldeman (Nixon's Karl Rove) and not to National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger.

No doubt Goss would be more discreet in showing his hand, but his appointment as director would be the ultimate in politicization. He has long shown himself to be under the spell of Vice President Dick Cheney, and would likely report primarily to him and to White House political adviser Karl Rove rather than to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/mcgovern.php?articleid=2944
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. sounds like
Edited on Tue Aug-10-04 07:37 AM by warrior1
he's working for the RNC and Ken Starr and not the america public. I have no faith in him. He stumbled right out of the gate. Now let's watch the media fall asleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Smirky on Tv now promoting Goss
Our pres* sure is a dork. He has a bozo like haircut and smirks with every over enunciated word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Goss had breakfast on 9-11 with Bob Graham
and ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad, the guy who gave Mohammed Atta $100,000 the week before 9-11!


http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html

Eight months later on the 18th of May, two days after the "BUSH KNEW" headline hit the tabloids, the Washington Post published an article on Porter Goss, entitled: "A Cloak But No Dagger; An Ex-Spy Says He Seeks Solutions, Not Scapegoats for 9/11". Focussing on his career as a CIA agent, the article largely served to underscore the integrity and commitment of Porter Goss to waging a "war on terrorism". Yet in an isolated paragraph, the article acknowledged the mysterious 9-11 breakfast meeting with ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad, while also confirming that "Ahmad :ran a spy agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban":

"Now the main question facing Goss, as he helps steer a joint House-Senate investigation into the Sept. 11 attacks, is why nobody in the far-flung intelligence bureaucracy -- 13 agencies spending billions of dollars -- paid attention to the enemy among us. Until it was too late.

Goss says he is looking for solutions, not scapegoats. "A lot of nonsense," he calls this week's uproar about a CIA briefing that alerted President Bush, five weeks before Sept. 11, that Osama bin Laden's associates might be planning airline hijackings.

"None of this is news, but it's all part of the finger-pointing," Goss declared yesterday in a rare display of pique. "It's foolishness."

(...) Goss has repeatedly refused to blame an "intelligence failure" for the terror attacks. As a 10-year veteran of the CIA's clandestine operations wing, Goss prefers to praise the agency's "fine work."

(...)

On the morning of Sept. 11, Goss and Graham were having breakfast with a Pakistani general named Mahmud Ahmed -- the soon-to-be-sacked head of Pakistan's intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. 17
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Obtuse Dweeb Who Came Across as Obtuse Dweeb in F9/11 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. I guess calling up the Media Hitmen to give them the story is only
inadvertent disclosure. No willful intent there. All a huge mistake but if he sees a blue dress he will spend the entire treasury to get to the bottom of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC