Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Leak of Double Agent Hurts Fight Against Al Qaeda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 10:44 PM
Original message
Bush Leak of Double Agent Hurts Fight Against Al Qaeda
The Bush Administration, announced a terror-alert on the Sunday after the Democratic Convention.

The warning came through Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge, who noted, "We must understand that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the president's leadership in the war against terror,” a comment which seemed like a political advertisement.

Some felt the timing of the warning was partially political, including Howard Dean.

It was then revealed that some of the information for the warning was years old. This made the timing of the warning more suspicious.

The Bush Administration in its defense said that some of the information came recently from Al Qaeda member Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan. Khan is a 25-year-old computer expert who had been arrested in Pakistan in early June.

The problem is that Khan had been working with Pakistani authorites as a double-agent to find the locations of other Al Qaeda members. Those operations to catch other Al Qaeda members were ruined by the Bush Adminstration leak.

For more, including audio of Al Franken linked at the bottom of the page, go to MOVELEFT.COM:

http://www.moveleft.com/moveleft_essay_2004_08_10_bush_admin._hurts_our_national_security_by_leaking_double_agent.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Crazy--stupid--ignorant--dimbulb--wrongway--criminally insane--
evil--dastardly--drizzle dick-vile--unspeakable fuckwits!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, I forgot
treasonous--despicable--unworthy--loutish--corrupt--typical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I just saw an interview
on MSNBC with an ex-CIA intelligence analyst who was so stunned by the 'administrations' pure stupidity he could barely speak.

What the HELL are these MORONS doing????!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Their excuse will be something like this:
"See! If the liberal media hadn't doubted us, we wouldn't have been FORCED to reveal Khan's name! It's all the Democrats' fault!"

Wait for it. I'm sure some right-wing pundit will say this, if they haven't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taylor Mason Powell Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's almost as if they're TRYING to help Al Qaeda...
almost as if they're actively trying to undermine the fight against Al Qaeda, so as to allow an attack to happen before the election. On the theory that it's the only thing that will save Bush now. I don't think it will, but what else do they have? Nothing.

Either that, or they're just criminally, recklessly stupid. Unbelievable!!

(And yet, all too believable...)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "they're TRYING to help Al Qaeda..." That's exactly what they are doing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. My opinion is that they are so hungry to maintain power, that
they were indifferent to the effect on fighting Al Qaeda.

I don't think the leak of the double-agent was for the purpose of helping Al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taylor Mason Powell Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You may be right...
it may be simple indifference...

or it may be something even more insidious. We may never know for sure. I just tend to see a pattern in this administration's "indifference" that makes me go hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. It's probably both
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AG78 Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's retaliation
for asking questions.

You keep questioning motives, or information, and we'll scare you. Fear is one of, if not the most, powerful of human emotions. This administration knows that. They're smart people.

And it's never been about al-Qaeda. If it was, we wouldn't have left Afghanistan before getting bin Laden, Zawahiri, or Omar. We wouldn't have really cared if they went a few miles into Pakistan. We would've gone in there and taken them. What, all of a sudden, the American Government/Military gives a damn about borders?

It's never been about al-Qaeda. It was about getting into Iraq. They got their excuse to go. They've wanted it for years, and they got it. Misson Accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks to Larry Johnson
Who would newspapers quote if he wasn't talking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Who is Larry Johnson? nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. WRONG! Clearly if we will do this to our own spies, they can just imagine
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 11:58 AM by Tweedtheatre
what we will do to theirs! We will win through fear: the best and only way to win this fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC