|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:36 PM Original message |
What if the IWR had failed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greatauntoftriplets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bush would have invaded anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Not to appease the masses, to appease congress. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ducks In A Row (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Confusing question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think they might have invaded in our name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's along the lines of what I've been thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. That and giving congress a chance to be involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well, I don't think we would have invaded, at least not right away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
President Jesus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-11-04 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. IWR was symbolic, hence the use of "resolution" instead of "act" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC