Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Chris Matthews gets a bad rap on here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:33 PM
Original message
I think Chris Matthews gets a bad rap on here
I was just watching Chris on Hardball and he was really on our side. First he was discussing stem cell research with a Bush campaign spokersperson and a Kerry campaign spokesperson. He sounded very pro stem cell research and he was attacking the Bush guy hard on his bs points about morality with stem cells.

Fast forward to a first ladies segment happening right now in which Chris has on Gale Sheedy of Mother Jones, and Melissa something or other from Newsweek. Chris slammed Laura Bush HARD on her opposition to stem cell research and her denunciation of supporters of stem cell research claiming that this research could be revolutionary.

I watch him at least twice a week and he seems to take the liberal side on most issues, even though he did vote for Bush in 2000.

Maybe people who watched this segment can back me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. He's a fucking prick and an asshole
He shits on Tip O'neils memory.

A dimestore whore has more class that Chris Matthews.

He's worse than Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Personal attacks are against the rules.
I alerted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Take a deep breath and grow a thick skin
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 10:39 PM by RationalRose
people with low post counts often don't ge a lot of respect. Sad, but true. It's like the new kid in high school...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Grow a thick skin?
You're joking, right? You don't think that post will get removed?

He told me to "shut the fuck up" and said that I was not on his "fucking side".

I've been here since February of 2001, reading articles in LBN and the discussions that follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I know he wasn't nice
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 10:47 PM by RationalRose
but again, it's an anonymous message board. The ignore function is your friend! :D

On edit-I AGREE with you. He just saw your low post count and let loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I would ignore him, if I knew his name
Unfortunately, his name was removed with the message. Don't know quite what to do now. If you remember his name and want to PM me, I'd appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. As you can see, that post got removed
I don't expect an apology from you for telling me to get a thick skin, but I wouldn't expect much from someone who would give me a response like that when all I was trying to do was start a discussion of this topic. This must be rip on me day or something. First I get criticized by someone for saying McDonald's should never have removed the Super size option at their restaurants, and now this.

Why do I even try? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
66. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. What a rude response
What got into your cheerios, sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. I was just going to say the exact same thing when I realized that the mod
had removed his message. I was ready to compare him with O'Really's usual "Shut up!" response.

That was probably the rudest and most uncalled-for response I've seen here at DU, at least that I can remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. It was
No excuse for that type of rudeness, I'm glad the mod was quick to delete it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have mixed feelings about him. I don't think he's all bad
Though I hate how he sometimes tends to suck up to whoever has public opinion on their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. He has some decent moments
But overall, he is just as dishonest as all the other t.v. millionaire pundits. He likes all that NBC cash stuffed in his pockets, and he won't do anything to jeopardize that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have noticed a distinct change in his bias
since the Democratic Convention. I think he must have been impressed by Kerry, and he is obviously smart enough to see how dumb Bush is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tweety blows with the wind
wait until tomorrow when he'll do a 180 and you'll be pissed off.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. You know what, forget it.
I start a thread with good intentions trying to stimulate a discussion and all I get are caustic remarks and someone telling me to shut the fuck up.

Last time I start a thread in here for awhile. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Sometimes people are jerks
I wouldn't take them too seriously. I'll apologize for them, heck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Guess it worked ....huh.... ?
If it matters ... I know what you mean about Tweety... I do sense a shift - may be wishful thinking, but I still believe he's a whore at heart... I'll watch him anyway tho' ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Don't get too worked up about it. You should be used to that from Repubs
Some people in here tend to act like assholes. You have to stand up to them. Post all you want, but be prepared for some of those types of responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks for the kind response
I've seen it on here many times but it's kinda different when the vitriol is directed at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Try posting about the Palestinian situation and watch fireworks fly
I give it all back, but back it up with facts. That's the easiest way to stop that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Which side of the Palestinian situation?
I don't really care about that area of the world because I don't have anything at stake there, and I've lurked enough in I/P to know that I don't want to touch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. In my experience, if you post anything positive about the Palestinians
or start talking about borders and land rights, you'll get a huge wave of people screaming at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Really?
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 10:51 PM by Bogus W Potus
That's surprising. In my opinion the Palestinian side is better represented than the Israeli side in the I/P forum. It seems there are about 15 regular pro-Palestinian posters and 7 or 8 pro-Israeli posters. I could be wrong about this, however, considering I've never posted in that forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. You're right. But one side seems to be less inclined to do research
and consider peoples' arguments. Of course, you probably already know that. I'll just leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. I think tweety is bi polar and can't really be counted on
for continuing fairness..can be confirmed by his next outrageous outburst that we have heard about so many times in the past.

I like your user name. Very creative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Hey, thanks. Not too many people know what it actually means
I've been using that "name" for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Kaizer Soze, maybe?
That would be my guess. Could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Bingo. Very observant of you
The Zorak face makes me seem even more mysterious. Do I really exist? Perhaps I'm a 1000+ post closet freeper just biding my time. He he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Sorry, I don't know what your name means.
Please tell me.

But I was addressing ..Bogus W. Potus, sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. He has had a problem with drinking in the past
Maybe it isn't quite past. Maybe he is drinking sometimes. Which would explain him being all over the map on issues and possibly his lack of knowledge on some of the most basic information; such as the Dr and the swift boat story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Thanks for the compliment
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. BTW - congrats on the post. It's now on fire.
The fact that you get more than 30 replies is usually something to be proud of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Yeah I am a master of flame bait I guess
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 11:04 PM by Bogus W Potus
lol jk. I didn't really think it would get more than 5 or 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Don't take it too hard, Bogus.
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 10:49 PM by Cat Atomic
That's just life on the rough-and-tumble internet, where everyone is 6'8". :P

I disagree with you, though. The biggest problem I have with Matthews isn't that he's more critical of Dems than Conservatives. It's that he's one of the most superficial "analysts" on TV. And that's saying something.

He completely ignores substance and talks about bullshit. He doesn't listen to his guests' answers, and rarely asks a follow up. He's everything I hate about what passes for political discourse on television.

And his voice is annoying as hell, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. His voice may be annoying,
but it's nowhere near as annoying as Hannity or O'Reilly's, I'll give him that much. Hannity takes the cake in the whiny voice category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I don't think thesound Hannity makes should even called a "voice".
Hannity's definitely got Matthews beat there.

The first time I heard Hannity I thought, "God, how did this guy get a job in radio? He's got the whiniest, most aggrivating voice I've ever heard. He couldn't be more annoying".

And then I heard what he was actually SAYING with that voice, and was instantly proven wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Some people just plain OVERREACT
Matthews is a jerk too much of the time. I have seen him spin to the right and talk up the right side way too many times. When I say "talk up the right", I really mean putting down the left by playing the "skewed" clips and out and out lies against the left by the right.

One more BIG THING...All of the Friggin BUSH COMMERCIALS during the Matthews show! That really sucks!

Matthews, to me, has fun at others expense. He seems all about ratings and trying to show his superiority. Although a supposed former Leftie, he has really treated some of the Democrats and thier positions shabbily. One of the most recent and worst, was his cutting off Al Sharpton's speech at the Democratic Convention because Sharpton ran long. Matthews, immediately started criticizing Sharpton and then started talking about the infamous Tawauna Braley(?) case. Totally inappropriate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. Sorry about the behavior of some of our members.
If you had watched Sharpton's speech and Treedy's reaction to it ,you wouldn't need to ask why some of us vacillate between admiration and disapproval of him. I watched today's show and was afixin' to send off a blistering e-mail about his critique of Teresa's speech when changed horses in mid-stream once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. You and me both
He irritates me to no end some times...too many times. I don't have much respect for him although I watch him because sometimes he has good guests on and sometimes he has some decent conversations on his show.

Apology accepted...use all of that passion against Mathews or Bush though.


P.S. Oberrmann is pretty entertaining and Lou Dobbs is pretty good sometimes to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Obermann rocks! I love watching his show. He's got balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bogus W Potus Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I enjoy Olbermann and definitely Dobbs.
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 11:07 PM by Bogus W Potus
Dobbs show is good because he talks about the bad effects of outsourcing. He is too hard on immigrants though. It's the classic paleoconservative position that if we just close our borders, we can protect jobs. I'm against that. I think we should let everyone who wants to come to America in because America's strength is our people. We have the most productive workers in the world for a reason.

I'm against this selective admission based on what country you're from. For example, the Coast Guard is more willing to let Cubans who come here stay than Haitians. Haitians deserve the right to stay here also. I say let them all stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. I lost all respect for him last night
In discussing the Swift Boat thing, when someone pointed out that the doctor in the ad wasn't the one who signed any of Kerry's records, he asked - with complete sincerity - "really?" (or "is that true?" - something to that effect) He went on to say that "if" that was true there was certainly a problem with the ad.

Mind you, this was at least the second time that I've seen him cover this issue on his show, and the fact about the doctor in the ad has been out since pretty much the beginning of the "controversy." The fact that he didn't know this told me that this man doesn't even bother to do the most basic research on these issues. And forget about doing the research just so he can, you know, do his job effectively - how can he have an opinion on an issue when he is so obviously not even misinformed, but UNinformed?!

He may be on the "right" side of stem cell research, but most people are. What's more, I'll give him credit for some amount of honesty - when he learned about the doctor in the ad he was willing to say flat out that that cut into the ad's credibility. My problem with him is not so much his politics but his very obvious laziness when it comes to educating himself about the issues he has a whole show to talk about. Can't they even get an intern or something to research this stuff for him? Hell, I'll volunteer myself as fact checker for him if necessary.

What a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissouriTeacher Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. I said the same thing the other day...
I don't think he's all that bad most of the time. Although I didn't know he voted for Bush. :puke:

He's always been against the Iraq war, and I also saw the bit you're talking about with his slamming Laura Bush for her talk on stem cells.

After watching his coverage of the convention, I do think he was impressed by Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. true, he was exceptionally fair during sharpton's convention speech
not.

tweety is a shaper of conventional wisdom, which is unfortunate since he has shown no intellectual consistency that would reveal core values.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
40. This is not a politically correct statement...
but sometimes I think he's borderline retarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
44. Tweety even said "i voted for bush"!...nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. That's evidence right there that he's not
a man of vision or even a student of history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
48. I think you are wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
49. Tweety....
was not normal during the clinton years and during the 2000 election....he had such hate for Clinton and Gore...it's like Clinton and Gore raped and killed his wife or something....he was incredibly unfair to Clinton during the Monica ordeal and was even more unfair to Gore during the 2000 election....he was falling in line with all the right wing talking points (i.e., gore invented the internet).

I will never forgive Tweety for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. exactly! ...nor can i forgive Tweety for that...
"he had such hate for Clinton and Gore...it's like Clinton and Gore raped and killed his wife or something....he was incredibly unfair to Clinton during the Monica ordeal and was even more unfair to Gore during the 2000 election....he was falling in line with all the right wing talking points (i.e., gore invented the internet)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
50. He gets a bad rap here because he deserves it!
I can;t believe that asshole ever worked for Tip O'Neil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
52. Dude, you need to watch..........
his show(s) more often. You caught him on a day when he was more angry about Laura than Dems. Trust me on this: it's usually the Dems that's on his sh-t list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBloodEngHeart Donating Member (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
54. the problem is he goes whatever way the wind is blowing
When Bush is popular, he loves Bush, when Bush isn't, he's tough on him.

He is the worst type of journalist, he keeps telling people what they want to hear rather than the truth. He views the whole political system as a game, and doesn't take it seriously. He doesn't believe in truth, but just BSs both sides. he's horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:27 PM
Original message
the problem is he's in love with the sound of his own voice, & never
gives his guests, who are far more interesting than he is, a chance
to answer his question...he's so damned rude always interrupting something you'd like to hear...that I once e mailed and told him
to shut up so someone could hear what his guest have to say...he did=
for about three days....once he also admitted that the producers had
told him to stop talking over people.

Yeah I like Olbermann, he's got guts and doesn't care whose toes he tells the truth about...

And Lou Dobbs is a one man grassroots organization.

The rest of CNN and MSNBC suck on the same level as Faux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. I read that howie fineman got in trouble with
tweety because he said that tweety's show on basic cable works better than the one on msrnc becuase tweety doesn't shout at his guests..ooops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. the problem is he's in love with the sound of his own voice, & never
gives his guests, who are far more interesting than he is, a chance
to answer his question...he's so damned rude always interrupting something you'd like to hear...that I once e mailed and told him
to shut up so someone could hear what his guest have to say...he did=
for about three days....once he also admitted that the producers had
told him to stop talking over people.

Yeah I like Olbermann, he's got guts and doesn't care whose toes he tells the truth about...

And Lou Dobbs is a one man grassroots organization.

The rest of CNN and MSNBC suck on the same level as Faux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
57. tehre is only one thing I like about Tweety:
without him there would be no wonderful Darryl Hammond parodies of Hardball on Saturday Night Live

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yeah, but let somebody mention BILL CLINTON or HILLARY...
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 11:31 PM by BiggJawn
...and see how long he stays on "our side".

He's a Ho. If he's Liberal, then pass me a Doobie, I'm a Libertarian....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
60. Sorry....not buying it
there are a million reasons to detest Tweety (outlined by posters here), but, for me, the nadir of Tweety's TV clowning was his interruption of Rev. Sharpton's address at the DNC to launch into a hysterical, screeching rant that served no other purpose than to slander and defame Sharpton WHILE HE WAS STILL DELIVERING HIS FRIGGIN' SPEECH!

I can forgive and forget a lot, but that was the single most disgraceful act I have ever witnessed from a TV pundit. Tweety is an outright disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
61. I watch him all the time and I think you are right. You were brave to post
this because I have thought this before but just not been in the mood to become a DU punching bag.

I have been sucker punched before from out of nowhere and didn't like it (although I would have known it was coming if you were going to say something nice about Tweety or just about anyone in the press who isn't an advocate for the Dem's).

He really pisses me off sometimes but I don't expect to agree with him, or anyone, all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
62. He's on our side this time
but barely. For some reason he does not like Clinton or Gore. However, I think he supports Kerry, but is not making it as obvious as some would like here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #62
67. He supports the Shrub!
He voted for the shrub in the last election. Besides, I guess you didn't watch his Democratic convention coverage. If you had you wouldn't have made those comments!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shindig Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
63. Don't let tweety fool you
It's the people who think Chris Matthews is on our side who aren't paying attention. Granted, he will throw a punch at the other side. But most of his snide remarks are for Democrats.

He didn't slam Laura Bush. He said someone else is at fault for having her say that. Standard Bush protectionism. Laura Bush is wonderful. Her handlers are messing up. This stuff is subtle but it's the whole of ball of wax, believe me.

Two nights ago, he used the phrase describing bush..."At least he's real." This means by implication, that Bush's opponent, John Kerry, is somehow not real or unreal.

This is the worst slap. It's subtle, but it appeals to lowest common denominator (and a lot of voters). They won't for someone who is "unreal."

When we lose, like we did in 2002 and 2000, it's because this type of stuff sticks. Tweety is still doing it. If we win, when we win, it's because it ain't sticking to us. Tweety is all about Bush, bottom line. He voted for Bush. He thinks Bush is real. He just loves that phoney fly-guy suit. Don't be fooled by Tweety!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
64. I don't think he plays to a certain political ideology......
I think he just plays to ratings. I don't like him because he talks too damn much and cuts people off when they try to answer his questions. I don't like his style. For me, it has nothing to do with politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
65. I agree
Tweety isn't as whorish as some may suggest. A reporter or talking head is supposed to ask tough questions, so long as it doesn't get transparently personal.

He's good at playing it fair, but I do think he has too many sexual hangups that need addressing. He sometimes asks some pretty weird questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
68. Did you watch the Democratic National Convention?
Edited on Thu Aug-12-04 07:56 AM by in_cog_ni_to
OMG....Tweety's coverage was SHAMEFUL. He has been kissing the chimp's ass ever since he stole the election. He cheered on the illegal invasion of Iraq. He HATES Bill Clinton because Clinton didn't give him a position in the WH and he has a antaean, behemothic, Brobdingnagian, Bunyanesque, colossal, cyclopean, dinosauric, elephantine, enormous, gargantuan, giant, gigantean, gigantesque, gigantic, Herculean, heroic, immense, jumbo, leviathan, lusty, mammoth, massive, massy, mastodonic, mighty, monster, monstrous, monumental, mountainous, planetary, prodigious, pythonic, ||swapping, Titan, titanic, tremendous, unfathomed, untold, vast, walloping, whacking, whaling, whopping;


MOUTH! He NEVER shuts up. He's rude. He interupts his guests so they never get to complete a damn sentence and his EGO is as big as his friggin' mouth. Tweety sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
69. Chris Matthews savaged Al Gore
all through the 2000 campaign. He savaged Bill Clinton from 98-01. And he is a registered puke. Chris Matthews is a punk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
70. He's not a liberal, but he plays one on tv
He is part of the re-definition of "news" as personality and opinion that has led to the poisoning of civic dialog in the country. He follows the neocon path of questioning the patriotism of Democrats and is more concerned with his image than with the truth.

You can find out more about him on the Daily Howler website or by reading David Brock's "The Republican Noise Machine".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC