Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HAHA - Porter Goss says he's UNQUALIFIED to be CIA chief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Laura_B_manslaughter Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:01 PM
Original message
HAHA - Porter Goss says he's UNQUALIFIED to be CIA chief

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=5944517

Wed Aug 11, 2004 06:40 PM ET

By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Congressman Porter Goss, President Bush's nominee for CIA director, could be his own worst enemy when it comes to making the case that he deserves to lead the U.S. intelligence agency.

"I couldn't get a job with CIA today. I am not qualified," the Florida Republican told documentary-maker Michael Moore's production company during the filming of the anti-Bush movie "Fahrenheit 9/11."

A day after Bush picked Goss for the top U.S. spy job, Moore on Wednesday released an excerpt from a March 3 interview in which the 65-year-old former House of Representatives intelligence chief recounts his lack of qualifications for employment as a modern CIA staffer.

"I don't have the language skills. I, you know, my language skills were romance languages and stuff. We're looking for Arabists today. I don't have the cultural background probably," Goss is quoted in an interview transcript.

"And I certainly don't have the technical skills, uh, as my children remind me every day: 'Dad you got to get better on your computer.' Uh, so, the things that you need to have, I don't have."

Goss, who served with the CIA clandestine services in Latin America and Europe in the 1960s, was not immediately available for comment.

(snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, man.
If this wasn't so important it would be funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. WOW, You have to love Moore
so fitting for him to once again show these nitwits for what they are.

I wonder what their spin will be tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura_B_manslaughter Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They prolly won't have to spin this
I bet the press ignores the story, big though it should be. I hope the Daily Show has heard about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can they do anything anymore without kicking their own asses?
It really is hysterical in a sick, perverted way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's funny til you realize the dems will rubber stamp him anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sadly, these comments only have humor value. They won't block him
No real dynamite here, of course. He was being self-deprecating, which almost always works with pols. Obviously he was talking about his lack of creds to be a field agent or analyst. That he's a bad choice for making policy decisions isn't discussed here.

Alas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC