Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why No Casualty Figures Anymore?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
heidiho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:31 AM
Original message
Why No Casualty Figures Anymore?
Is it because we've turned the country over to the Iraqis?

I never hear a mention, yet each week on Stephanopolis' show, they
have the memoriam section and I'm always surprised to see so many who have died.

Don't these young people matter anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Casualties are ugly.
We can't be polluting our beautiful minds with dead people, can we ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I see....dead people....
the administration believes (and to some degree, correctly) that preventing the good ol folks in the USA from seeing the Butcher's Bill will prevent us from accurately weighing the cost of Operation Bush's Folly in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Honey Pie...The war is sooooooo Last year...
Edited on Thu Aug-12-04 09:37 AM by SoCalDem
The Iraqis are "in charge" now, so there are no more casualties..
Those dead soldiers in US uniforms..well you know how the desert is.. It's summertime.. and there are those mirages...

and all that black smoke by Najaf?? That's not smoke.. It's just "partly cloudy"..and it's the part over Najaf that's cloudy......


Anythiing that goes wrong from here on is.... well.. Chalabi's fault???...Kerry's fault????... Edwards' fault???... Teddy Kennedy's fault???

It's not George's fault.. he "passed that hot potato off"..He's got an election to campaign for.. can't be bothered with that "war stuff" (the dirty part of it anyway)..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. here you go
There have been 1,060 coalition deaths, 935 Americans, 64 Britons, six Bulgarians, one Dane, one Dutch, one Estonian, one Hungarian, 19 Italians, one Latvian, seven Poles, one Salvadoran, three Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and seven Ukrainians, in the war in Iraq as of August 12, 2004 (Graphical breakdown of casualties). The list below is the names of the soldiers, Marines, airmen, sailors and Coast Guardsmen whose families have been notified of their deaths by each country's government. At least 6,276 U.S. troops have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon. The Pentagon does not report the number of non-hostile wounded. This list is updated regularly.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/

Iraq civilians deaths 11510 to 13483

Protest Bush in Santa Monica, CA today!


For more information check this Activism forum:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=106x9439
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Orders from on high to bury the Iraq story
Rover has ordered Scaife, Black, Murdoch, et al, to keep Iraq off the front pages and away from the top of the hour newscasts...

I mean, just this past Sunday, the Tribune-controlled Hartford (CT) Courant did not have a mention of Iraq until page A11 despite this latest shooting match starting a few days before that. 10 pages of other news was more worthy than Iraq...

If Iraq is out of sight, it will soon be out of mind to Americans. I am guessing that most Americans think casualties have gone down since the transfer of power due to this Rove tactic, when the have actually spiked upwards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. and as the toll escaletes
and people start talking to each other - comparing notes , sharing insights
the Administration needs to be very careful with this tactic. If it blows up and the scope of the supressed news and the deceptions become more widely known the ground swell will be every bit as great as the opposition to the Vietnem War.

Iraq was not well planned.

This has the potential to backfire. We can not seem to win this war militarily.
I wonder where the point of realization begins that we have passed diminishing returns long, long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. They can try
Edited on Thu Aug-12-04 09:49 AM by joefree1
We're just weeks or even days from topping 1000 US deaths in Iraq (conservative figure).

There have been 1,060 coalition deaths, 935 Americans, 64 Britons, six Bulgarians, one Dane, one Dutch, one Estonian, one Hungarian, 19 Italians, one Latvian, seven Poles, one Salvadoran, three Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and seven Ukrainians, in the war in Iraq as of August 12, 2004 (Graphical breakdown of casualties). The list below is the names of the soldiers, Marines, airmen, sailors and Coast Guardsmen whose families have been notified of their deaths by each country's government. At least 6,276 U.S. troops have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon. The Pentagon does not report the number of non-hostile wounded. This list is updated regularly.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/

Iraq civilians deaths 11510 to 13483


Download the free bumper art here:
http://ediablo.com/eDiabloGallery.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. The UK Guardian noticed, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC