Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How They Could Steal the Election This Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stone_Spirits Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 12:41 AM
Original message
How They Could Steal the Election This Time
good read...

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040816&s=dugger

How They Could Steal the Election This Time

by Ronnie Dugger

On November 2 millions of Americans will cast their votes for President in computerized voting systems that can be rigged by corporate or local-election insiders. Some 98 million citizens, five out of every six of the roughly 115 million who will go to the polls, will consign their votes into computers that unidentified computer programmers, working in the main for four private corporations and the officials of 10,500 election jurisdictions, could program to invisibly falsify the outcomes.

The result could be the failure of an American presidential election and its collapse into suspicions, accusations and a civic fury that will make Florida 2000 seem like a family spat in the kitchen. Robert Reich, Bill Clinton's Labor Secretary, has written, "Automated voting machines will be easily rigged, with no paper trails to document abuses." Senator John Kerry told Florida Democrats last March, "I don't think we ought to have any vote cast in America that cannot be traced and properly recounted." Pointing out in a recent speech at the NAACP convention that "a million African-Americans were disenfranchised in the last election," Kerry says his campaign is readying 2,000 lawyers to "challenge any place in America where you cannot trace the vote and count the votes" .


The potential for fraud and error is daunting. About 61 million of the votes in November, more than half the total, will be counted in the computers of one company, the privately held Election Systems and Software (ES&S) of Omaha, Nebraska. Altogether, nearly 100 million votes will be counted in computers provided and programmed by ES&S and three other private corporations: British-owned Sequoia Voting Systems of Oakland, California, whose touch-screen voting equipment was rejected as insecure against fraud by New York City in the 1990s; the Republican-identified company Diebold Election Systems of McKinney, Texas, whose machines malfunctioned this year in a California election; and Hart InterCivic of Austin, one of whose principal investors is Tom Hicks, who helped make George W. Bush a millionaire.

About a third of the votes, 36 million, will be tabulated completely inside the new paperless, direct-recording-electronic (DRE) voting systems, on which you vote directly on a touch-screen. Unlike receipted transactions at the neighborhood ATM, however, you get no paper record of your vote. Since, as a government expert says, "the ballot is embedded in the voting equipment," there is no voter-marked paper ballot to be counted or recounted. Voting on the DRE, you never know, despite what the touch-screen says, whether the computer is counting your vote as you think you are casting it or, either by error or fraud, it is giving it to another candidate. No one can tell what a computer does inside itself by looking at it; an election official "can't watch the bits inside," says Dr. Peter Neumann, the principal scientist at the Computer Science Laboratory of SRI International and a world authority on computer-based risks.
-more-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm going with permanent absentee status.............................
so I can mark my paper ballot and at least leave a paper trail. Not so sure they will count it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Victimerican Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another problem I've thought of with computerize ballots
What's to stop Repub "operatives" to go to the polls wit one of those super magnets that can wipe a computer's hard drive from just being in the same room? They wouldn't even need to get that close to it, just walk into a heavily Democratic booth, (say, in Portland, or San Francisco) towards the end of the night, and nullify all the votes taken by that machine all day. Hell, if they got a hold of a decent sized EMP, I imagine they could do it from outside, although I'm not entirely sure the pulse would delete any data, it certainly would stop the votes for a while.

Not to mention the problem of outside hacking. Now I'm not sure how they are going to set up the machines, but I assume that there will be a network, private or not that will connect all the machines to one hub where they can be more easily tallied. (And if I'm wrong here, forget this entire paragraph :p ) What's to stop a rogue hacker from intercepting the data, and simply switching the candidates; that is, instead of Kerry winning 57% to Bush's 40%, the hub reports that booth as reporting in at Bush's 57%.

I can understand the programmers in this instance wanting to both remain anonymous and have the code stay hidden, at least until after the election. If the code used to write these machines were to be made public (although it would be fairly easy to figure out the basics without it) it would allow hackers a chance to try and find the inevitable loopholes, and give them an opportunity to edit the election's results.

I might have just read one too many Cyberpunk novels, and am overly paranoid, but I just see too many things that can go wrong with computerized ballot machines. I honestly don't see why we don't just nationalize the whole thing, at least for Presidential elections, and use the older lever machines. My town has used them for as long as I can remember, and they seem to be near flawless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Welcome to DU Victimerican,
The first thing you should do is read this book. :evilgrin:

:kick:BLACK BOX VOTING - Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century:kick:



Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9*
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13*
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Appendix
Footnotes
Index


* graphics, allow time to load

Requires free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Victimerican Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Got through a couple chapters tonight...
But I'm going to go to bed for now. I'll print it out and finish the rest tomorrow. (On second thought, ixnay the printing and the finishing, that's one mammoth of a book.) Thanks though, it looks interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura_B_manslaughter Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Democracy is a hoax
It prolly always has been but no question about it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC