Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Learn this debate technique: "When adjusted for inflation"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 04:57 PM
Original message
Learn this debate technique: "When adjusted for inflation"
this morning on C-Span, conservative George Will tried to defend bush's record on the economy by citing that gas prices, when adjusted for inflation are really very low ... btw, as an aside, Will conveniently side-stepped a caller's question about how can he, a conservative, continue to support bush when the republicans control the house, the senate and the white house and have run up historic budget deficits ...

on NPR today, a commentator reading the news jumped to bush's defense when reading a story about oil prices ... she said that today's prices are far from record high oil prices when adjusted for inflation

there's probably a great name for this technique ... i have no idea what debate experts call it ... i call it lying !!

a proper comparison would be to compare today's oil and gas prices to those in effect when bush took office ... comparing prices to all time records is hardly relevant ... it's like having a defense attorney argue "yes, my client brutally murdered that defenseless little old lady, but he's not as bad as Hitler" ... the argument may be true but it's irrelevant when measuring the client's conduct ... to measure bush's performance, you measure him from the time he took office ...

if anyone feels like doing some research, I'd like to know what a barrel of oil cost the day bush took office ... same for a gallon of gas ... the point of all this is that bush's hideous pro-oil, anti-mideast hawkish policies are bankrupting the U.S. treasury ...

so don't be fooled ... it's fine to adjust today's prices for inflation BACK TO THE DAY bush TOOK OFFICE ... but don't give me this specious argument about comparing it to the all time records ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe he can add in why
if prices are soooooooooooo low, why we continue to use more gas and oil at increasingly insane rates? Doesn't sound like a conservative plan to me...

(now some of them say that oil may not be non-renewable, yet they still can't find anywhere to retreat to when we say in return that while we don't know if it's renewable, it's still a fact we're using far more than what can be replenished in a viable period of time.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gas prices are driving inflation
Of course everything pales by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's called "numbers hocus pocus"
That's what fired MI senator and Federalist Society founder, Spence Abraham said during a debate with now Senator Debbie Stabenow. Debbie was pointing out the fact that the largest tax increase in our nation's history, when adjusted for inflation, was the one proposed by GHWB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Another one is "rate of growth"
which they like to express as a percentage.

To paraphrase Bartcop, Clinton had us going 90 mph, so when we sped up to 92 it wasn't a huge rate of growth. But the Chimp slowed us to a near-stop, so as we go from 10 mph to 20 mph the *rate* of change is fast -- but it's still slow. There's always a big-looking "bounce" after the economy hits the dumps.

So they keep talking about the "fast-growing" economy -- faster than it's been since the last time Republicans drove us downhill!! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's another one - percentages
When someone tells you a percentage statistic, but doesn't provide you the supporting numbers that make up that percentage, your bullshit detector should be on high.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I heard that on NPR on my drive home. I thought the same thing...
Context was that Kerry criticized Bush for the ME instability that lead to the price spike. NPR then added the "adjusted for inflation" to minimize the effect of Kerry's words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Adjusted for inflation, the 1968 minimum wage...
would be $8.72 per hour today. The current rate of $5.15 represents a more than 40% decline. We can use that one too. ;)

By the way, did anyone mention when and what the all time high oil price was, and how much that would be in current dollars? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. no info on that
sorry, i was too lazy to do any research ...

i was thinking the highest adjusted for inflation oil prices might have occurred under Carter during the Iran hostage crises ... that would be a great way to spin bush's record on the economy:

bush has given us the highest oil prices, adjusted for inflation, since Jimmy Carter ... i don't think he's likely to pick that up as a campaign slogan ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yea! You're right.
I did find this graph that's of some use: though you'll note it ends in '03.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. selectively adjusting for inflation
lets not mention minimum wage adjusted for inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC