Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the sales tax be abolished?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 07:22 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should the sales tax be abolished?
It was tax free day not long ago for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like the idea of no sales tax and a higher income tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. The sales tax is inherently regressive, so it should be abolished
and replaced with a property tax, or a tax on upper income levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. A sales tax can be made more progressive
with necessities untaxed and a surtax on luxury items. It would have the benefit of pulling in the underground economy of working under the table and working at illegal activities. The problem is that it would decrease consumption of everything except necessities and foul the economy up even more than it is.

The progressive income tax is the only way to fund this country, along with tariffs to protect American jobs and industries. All income, corporate and private, earned and investment, has to be subject to it. Everybody suspects this is true, but the only way we'll get to it is by having the stake of another depression driven through the heart of supply side, deregulatory, free trade dogma.

The hard part is that I think that's exactly what's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I like your idea best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm in "tax free" NH, no sales tax, no income tax. Crazy property
tax, Court orders regrading distribution of money for education due to inherent unfairness. Too f*d up for Words. Guess what, Repuke Governor, and Legislature. Big surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. NH is a mess-if you include prop taxes, their tax burden is higher than MA
and we're known as "Taxachusetts". :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joy Anne Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pennsylvania sales tax is good
It doesn't apply to food bought in grocery stores or to clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only on basics, like food, medicine, school supplies etc.
I would triple it on Hummers, Yachts, real jewelry, and other such extravagances. Also, services should have a sales tax. All these rich people who can afford pricey accountants, lawyers and plastic surgery should be made to pay a good hefty service tax charge. If we taxed consumption for the rich maybe we wouldn't even need income taxes anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't believe I found myself explaining "regressive sales tax"
why we don't deserve a flat tax, etc to a freeper type the other day. Also had to explain how the wealthy are also users of government welfare, mostly in protection of the banking and financial systems, ibfratructure, regulation of consumer and environmental concerns, military, etc, to protect their wealth and lifestyle. They said they had never considered that! Duh.

I think the luxury tax would finally work if it was clear from the beginning that it wasn't a "trial", like the last time. When it was tried in Bush41's residency, they knew if they complained enough it'd be reversed. If it is there to stay, they'll ante up and pay it because they can freaking afford to.

We have food, certain medical, and certain ag products (seed, I believe) exempted from sales tax in Texas, but the rest really adds up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC