Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proportional Electoral Votes on Colorado Ballot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:00 PM
Original message
Proportional Electoral Votes on Colorado Ballot
What do you think of this?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1963&e=3&u=/ap/20040816/ap_on_el_pr/colorado_electoral_votes_1
Colo. Weighs Proportional Electoral Votes

A plan to scrap the winner-take-all system of allocating electoral votes in Colorado is heading to the ballot in November.

If passed, Amendment 36 would make Colorado the first state to allocate electoral votes proportionately according to the popular vote, rather than giving a winner all of the state's electoral votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. colorado
I dont think it will fly
I dont like it at all, it would affect the national election
So one state should not be doing something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's a start
This is one way to address the inherent unfairness of the electoral college without a constitutional amendment. I don't think we'll ever go to a direct popular vote because many of the small states would have to agree to give up their disproportionate power in determining presidential elections. But a state-by-state approach, half-assed as it may be, has some chance of working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. wrong.
"""If passed, Amendment 36 would make Colorado the first state to allocate electoral votes proportionately according to the popular vote, rather than giving a winner all of the state's electoral votes. """



Maine and Nebraska have proportional electors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not according to the popular vote (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. courtesy of your federal govt.
Edited on Mon Aug-16-04 01:23 PM by bullimiami
Only two States, Nebraska and Maine, do not follow the winner-takes-all rule. In those States, there could be a split of electoral votes among candidates through the State's system for proportional allocation of votes. For example, Maine has four electoral votes and two Congressional districts. It awards one electoral vote per Congressional district and two by the state-wide, "at-large" vote. It is possible for Candidate A to win the first district and receive one electoral vote, Candidate B to win the second district and receive one electoral vote, and Candidate C, who finished a close second in both the first and second districts, to win the two at-large electoral votes. Although this is a possible scenario, it has not actually occurred in recent elections.


So. Yes and No. Not just straight proportional division by percentage but proportionally allocated from the popular vote nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC