I even heard Howard Stern talk about her this morning. Specifically her comment on Larry King and elsewhere about how Stem Cell Research "really won't bring about any cures in the near future" what the fuck!
There is a good editorial from yesterday's LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-kinsley15aug15,0,3403601.column?coll=la-news-comment-opinionsMichael Kinsley:
False Hopes Beat No Hope
Laura Bush weighs in on stem-cell study.
Maybe I missed it, but it seems as if Laura Bush has not had her Lady Macbeth Moment. This is the period, hallowed by tradition if not actually written into the Constitution, when the media discover that a president's wife is the power behind the throne. She is not the sweet helpmate she appears to be. Underneath, there is steel. In fact, she is a (insert a word — there are more than one — beginning with "b"). She is her husband's closest advisor and a fierce protector of his place in history. She curbs his partisan instincts or, alternatively, she keeps him on the ideological course. A well-known male rival for the president's ear has been fired on her instructions.
Rosalynn Carter, Nancy Reagan and Barbara Bush all had their moments.
It was a challenge to fit Hillary Clinton into this template, but with a few little fixes (the demure helpmate stuff had to go), she was squeezed in as well.
But when does Laura Bush get her turn? For almost four years, she has loyally played along with the treacly conceit, assigned to her at the beginning of the administration, that her only public policy passion is libraries. As far as anyone knows, she has never questioned or failed to obey the instructions of the president's official advisors and spinmeisters. Of course, neither has her husband.
More at the link