From today's NYT article:
NYT: Nation's Charter Schools Lagging Behind, U.S. Test Scores RevealNation's Charter Schools Lagging Behind, U.S. Test Scores Reveal
By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO
ASHINGTON, Aug. 16 - The first national comparison of test scores among children in charter schools and regular public schools shows charter school students often doing worse than comparable students in regular public schools.
The findings, buried in mountains of data the Education Department released without public announcement, dealt a blow to supporters of the charter school movement, including the Bush administration.
The data shows fourth graders attending charter schools performing about half a year behind students in other public schools in both reading and math. Put another way, only 25 percent of the fourth graders attending charters were proficient in reading and math, against 30 percent who were proficient in reading, and 32 percent in math, at traditional public schools.
(snip)
Charters are expected to grow exponentially under the new federal education law, No Child Left Behind, which holds out conversion to charter schools as one solution for chronically failing traditional schools.
(more)
****
I am ashamed to admit that when I first read this, I thought, "Another Bush failure! More reasons to boot him."
Of course, Shrub doesn't give a damn. Even if he loses the election, how does Shrub's future compare to the fate of the students who have been the victims of his destructive influence on education? In the end, as always, the most vulnerable in our society--the poor, children, minorities--get the shaft while Shrub and lackeys like Rod Paige will go sailing off into the sunset unscathed.
My momentary schadenfreude at Shrubby's troubles is a sour and cold dish, yielding only heartburn and bile.