Historians vs. George W. Bush

[goddess40]

Of 415 historians who expressed a view of President Bush’s administration to this point as a success or failure, 338 classified it as a failure and 77 as a success. (Moreover, it seems likely that at least eight of those who said it is a success were being sarcastic, since seven said Bush’s presidency is only the best since Clinton’s and one named Millard Fillmore.)

http://hnn.us/articles/5019.html

I realize this doesn't come as a surprise to anyone hear, I just wish those drooling Faux News watchers would get it.

[chelsea0011]

1. What exactly qualifies as a success? These 77 must be apologists

There is nothing successful about the Bush years.

[goddess40]

2. He killed lots of people

to some nut jobs that makes him a success.

[NewJeffCT]

3. Historians for Big Business

Professor John Doe, the Texaco Professor of History at Univ. of Texas at Crawford.

Professor Jane Smith, the GE Prof of US History at Bob Jones University...