Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The war probably would have been a good thing if done right...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:46 PM
Original message
The war probably would have been a good thing if done right...
how many DU'ers believe that?

they are saying that on AAR :puke:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who is saying this?
Bob Graham said that Saddam was the wrong target and that we must take out the Real Terrorists like Hamas, Al-Quiada, and deal with the Saudi's ties to Terrorists. I opposed this stupid war because it cause and it has, sensless deaths that have made us less safe.

For the record, I supported Bob Graham and then he dropped out so I went to Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. the blogger they have on 'Majority Report' all the time...
atrios(sp?)

i think this maybe knee jerk coverage for our man kerry's insensitive comment the other day.

:shrug:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Atrios said that?
That I would call overboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. A good thing?
When is sacrificing lives for no real reason a good thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. only when your protecting your homeland
but you did say 'for no REAL reason' and i would agree i don't see ANY justification even the one they use 'DEMOCRACY' which we haven't seen a TRACE of since the invasion.

:argh:

peace

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Please pass me a bucket -- QUICK!!!!
Is there any "right" way to kill people -- whether innocent or not) -- and rain death and destruction on a country???

And, to drive the point home, check out the latest at Iraq Body Count.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. here ya go...


make sure you refill it before ya pass it on ;->

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. My friend used to give me
shit all the time before the war started and after for not supporting the invasion, she just couldn't get it through her head that i thought it was wrong with or without internationial support. She thought that until she saw F911 and when we got out she was so angry with herself that she told me she was sorry for being so unwilling to listen. I will never think this war was the right thing to do....ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. glad to hear she was open minded enough to go see it
and willing to admit she was wrong... sounds like a good friend.

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmags Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it were done competently
the situation would obviously be a lot better. One can only wonder how different Iraq would look if the US had not only guarded the Oil Ministry, or disbanded the entire Iraqi army with nothing for them to fall back on, or used some of the billions of tax dollars on employing Iraqi's to rebuild their own country instead of Halliburton.

I don't think we'd have 1000 dead right now, but it still wouldn't have been "right", and it still wouldnt' have been a "good thing".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. agreed
:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbg Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sure
If the Xtreme G.I.Joe Ultra-Ninja Penetration Ranger Seals force had just parachuted in and shot a few guards, slit a few throats (and the blood goes hissssss!) and taken Saddam, Uday and Qusay out and made it out of there in a breakneck midnight Hummer and dunebuggy chase through the midnight desert--why then shore!
It'd be great! Initials on the screen!

But that's the "Saddam was a bad man" war.

The WMD war?

The Bring Democracy to Iraq War? The Shining Example War?

The Show The Towelheads that you Don't Fuck with Toby Kieth war?

When you come down to it, America doesn't have any idea which war they're fighting--which people are beginning to wake up to, and which is the thing that'll doom Bush.

One fact emerges: GWB is losing ALL of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. bush is a RADICAL
shuts up real conservatives in a heartbeat.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Invading a sovereign country which is no threat to you is evil, period.
No one seems to remember that quite a few dictators have been overthrown by their own people. Remove the sanctions in return for permanent weapons inspections, and Saddam would likely have eventually become one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think you are right.
This invasion was so wrong on so many levels. Nothing happens that doesn't have repercussions whether immediate or in the distant future. This will come back to haunt us for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Also illegal, unnecessary, immoral, inhumane, and unjust, but that seems
no matter nary a whit to maybe about 50% of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. yeah, thats the point that is NEVER discussed in the media
we are behaving JUST LIKE imperial japan with their GEACPS plan for ASIA.

but that REALITY is too radical to jive with cartoon world view the media AND our leadership perpetuate.

:scared:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
43. Protecting ethnic Albanians in Kosovo was evil?
If we had intervened in Rwanda, it would have been evil? If we intervene in Sudan, it will be evil?

How... interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. Yes, what that did was promote the ethnic cleansing of Serbs---
--and other minorities in Kosovo by the Albanian majority, who are only a majority in the first place because of their enthusiastic support of the Nazi-backed killing of 500,000 Serbs in WW II.

Milosevic was attempting to deal with this perfectly legitimate problem with thuggish Ariel Sharon-style methods. The Serbian Parliament, realizing how counterproductive this was, passed a resolution to put the province under a UN mandate. This was ignored in favor of an aerial assault on a civilian population. So yes, that was evil.

As far as Rwanda, no possible intervener would want to plant permanent military bases there to dominate the place, so that would have been different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. The thing is
Edited on Wed Aug-18-04 07:09 PM by Lefty Pragmatist
the action in Afghanistan *was* a good thing, and it killed plenty of people just as dead as in Iraq, and plenty of them were innocent. So was the US action in WW2, where we contributed to the deaths of millions, plenty of whom just wanted to go on with their checkers and not ef with anybody.

The Iraq invasion would have been justified under certain circumstances:
+ direct aid by Saddam of AQ
+ a threat on the US by Saddam
+ WMD

None of those was true, and it was known at the time that they weren't true, so it was a put up job and not a "good" action.

Just as there are things worth risking your life defying the system for, there are things worth using the military and risking your and other's lives for. Pacifism is cute, but outside of a college campus or a stoner town it only works in a world that accepts it universally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Afghanistan isn't even 'WON' yet that was a 'good THING'?
oh, really...

'Pacifism is cute'

wtf does that got to do with ANYTHING mentioned in my post?

i'm lost...

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Our actions in Afghanistan were justified.
And if, IF we would have finished the job, I think (and this is only my opinion, wrong or right) there would have been a major shift in the balance of power in the Middle East with Afghanistan going democratic anyway. But Shrubya, being Idiot Child that he is and listening to the neo-con chickenhawks around him totally screwed up the whole thing. Now we are going to be seen as invaders for the next 5 generations or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I agree
Afganistan was where the money and troops should be, chimp is an idiot who had to go on the cheap and botch that whole thing up. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. not so sure I agree
the Taliban had agreed to hand over anyone that the US had proof of committing terrorist acts. Now some may say the Taliban weren't to be trusted but apparently they were trustworthy enough to wine and dine over pipeline deals. Instead we blanket bombed a nation with fuck all left to bomb and gave the country back to a pack of murderous rapists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. All of the actions were justified?
Edited on Wed Aug-18-04 08:10 PM by DrWeird
bombing the red cross building?

bombing the wedding ceremony?

mistreating and killing the prisoners?

Or just in the sense that we went after Osama, even though we didn't really go after Osama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Agreed going after REAL Terrorist was a good cause
but then again that was a big part of the arguement against the Iraq war.

Saddam was contained and NO THREAT to the US

Osama got away

Bush and Cheney have been playing 911 for all it is worth. T

THEY USED THOSE VICTIMS OF 911

THEY RAIDED THE US TREASURY IN THE NAME OF 911

THEY STARTED AN UNJUST WAR UNPROVOKED AND FOR OIL IN THE NAME OF 911

and they continue to wave the flag in the name of the 911 victims. It is the most open public display of greed, hate, and down right dishonesty I have ever witnessed.

I am actually shocked any one can support these guys and call their self an American
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. but when have we done that?
SA, pakistan are still our best buds.

"I am actually shocked any one can support these guys and call their self an American"

agree 100%

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Thanks for making sense in a scary time for america
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dingbats.
Who in his right mind would think that Iraqis would welcome infidels to conquer and occupy their country?

The naivete is breathtaking, even after the last fourteen months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. yeah
especially after the last 14 months.

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's what the Germans said after things got messy in Russia.
Everything would have been rosy if them durned Russkis would have been happy to have been "liberated".

The revisionists say the same thing about Vietnam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. and what the japanese said after PH.
if the americans would have took the hint and stayed out of their way in asia.

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. isnt that what they say about vietnam too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. yep
but it's a new generation who never heard these excuses before. :shrug:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. If the war had been "done right"
We wouldn't have invaded a country without cause

Without allies

Without realistic and achievable goals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. bingo
and an exit strat from the CHAMPION and AUTHOR of that very principal :puke:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Did they say King George should have ridden his horse, leading his Crusade
with all of his noble Lords flanking him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. don't give'em no ideas
i'd hate to see that on the teeVee one day =)

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
45. Don't worry. You won't see gwbush* riding a horse.
Edited on Wed Aug-18-04 11:22 PM by bvar22
He is afraid of horses.
This was revealed during his first State Visit to Mexico. Presidente Fox had scheduled a horseback session that bunny had to back out of because of his fear of horses.
Not reported in the US, but really embarrassing considering the latino machismo thing.


On Edit: This fear is probably rational considering his poor performance on bicycles and Segways. bush* should stay away from any animals that are smarter than he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. Sure, if Saddam was removed and no innocent people were killed.
The issue is that the cost is far too high for a low-grade humanitarian mission that was billed as a war of national security. There was NO THREAT to this country from Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. which everyone knows is impossible...
i hope :scared:

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yeah, just like attacking Venezuela would be a good thing if done right?
:puke:

They'll use the same reasoning to attack Chavez as they did Iraq.

Maybe that's why Bu$h is pulling the troops out of Asia and Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our third quarter 2004 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. Typically dishonest mischaracterization.
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
41. Ouch. Who uttered that nonsense?
No, I don't want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
42. Horse manure!
The war was crap, from prologue to current quagmire. There was never any benefit in it for anyone but greedy corporate pigs.

Afghanistan was a crock as well. Fifteen Saudis (supposedly, tho Goddess knows what really happened) commit mass murder and you go after Afghanistan? Makes perfect sense to me :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. J. Kerry and J. Edwards may come around...
when Iraq implodes and Afghanistan is only controlled in Kabul. The two invasions were stupid and made the US less safe, cost a lot of lives and the MC tax payer billions but the Neo Fascists and their Corp. funders all made millions, some billions and will for awhile with those invasions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. bingo
I have never understood the "bombing afghanistan was a legit response after 9/11" theory. How 'bout bombing Saudi - how was 9/11 supposed to organised from a country like Afghanistan, how was it financed from a country like Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC