Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The myth of security against terrorism under Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:19 AM
Original message
The myth of security against terrorism under Bush
One of the right wing memes out right now is that Bush has kept us safe from terrorism, and as proof, they point out that there haven't been any terrorist attacks since 9/11.
Nonsense.
If there haven't been any successful terrorist attacks since 9/11 because they have been thwarted by bush, then where are the captured terrorists? We haven't been capturing throngs of terrorists "caught in the act", people that have new plans for attacks. We've been capturing members of the network, but so far, I haven't heard anything about them foiling active plots. the best they could do a few weeks ago was come up with 3 year old plans. If Bush were actually successful, and we were safer because we have been stopping terrorism, then we would see cases where there were plans that were interrupted and terrorists stopped while planning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Guantanamo Bay is supposedly chock full
of terrorists. It's a myth alright.
Although I still say 9/11 itself is Bush's biggest liability in the WOT, which didn't even exist in his pea brain before that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gitmo is full of people rounded up not long after 9/11
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 07:53 AM by EstimatedProphet
I just haven't heard of any busted-up terrorist cells in the last year, have you? They're either not there, or we're not safer. It can't be both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Bush is creating "terrorist cells"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. how on earth can we be safer
when we've violated the dignity of all Iraqi's and enraged the entire Muslim population of the world by acting like a bunch of thuggish infidels and spewing nothing but hateful and simplistic rhetoric ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. We are safer because GWB says we are and he loves Jesus and does God's
work. End of story, end of discussion: We just must accept his words and actions on faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rangefinder Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. It strikes me
that maybe they never really planned (at least in the short term) to do any major assaults on the US. I was sitting in a packed movie theater the other night, and it occurred to me that if wanton violence were the aim, why couldn't they go to a gun store and do something crazy? We've got our own wackos who do it all the time. Once again, I'll ask, why hasn't this line of thinking been pursued in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. My point exactly
Freepers come out and say "We haven't had any terrorist attacks since 9/11, so bush is protecting us." I personally believe they planned one, then sat back and watched us do their work for them. there haven't been any more attacks not because they've been foilled, but because they knew there wouldn't be any need for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rangefinder Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. EP-
I'm new to the forums and have to ask, what is a "Freeper"? I hope I don't fall into this catagory, it doesn't sound so good ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Freeper is, you're right, someone you don't want to be
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 09:51 AM by EstimatedProphet
http://www.freerepublic.com/ for an example of warped freeper logic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. IMHO the goal of terrorists strikes is to weaken the USofA and to
instill terror in the citizens. The terra ists don't have to do that because GWB & his admin do that for them. They keep the terra alive. Don't ya know that the real bad guys just laugh at them and mock them. Its sort of like Jessie James getting the credit for all the bank robberies through out the west, he didn't have to lift a finger and may have had no part in a robbery, but he was blamed. It becomes a joke and the bad guys enjoy the laugh and the credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Exactly
Why should AlQaida go to all the effort of an elaborate terrorist attack on the US to terrify us, when we do it already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Hi Rangefinder!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rangefinder Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thanks, newyawker99-
Hope to see you in a couple of weeks. . .even if I wouldn't know your face ;) I'm doing some documentary work at the convention and suspect there will be a lot of folks from the DU there. What a great opperation (DU) I'll be donating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. bush says we're safer; US State Dept says we're not safer.
Rest of the entire world's experts also say we're not safer./ But of course bush is god.

State Dept: Terrorism up under Bush

Terror attacks at highest level since 1982.


http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_report_062304,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. How do RWWs explain 911 & Clinton then???
If 911 is Clinton's fault, EIGHT MONTHS AFTER he left office, then obviously all the 911s we're gonna be hit with thanks to bush's total incompetance won't happen until AFTER his arse is booted out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Those will still be Clinton's fault
All bad things are Clinton's fault, no matter when they happened. Vesuvius destroyed Pompeii because Bill Clinton was going to be born in 1900 years. This is all because Bill Clinton is the anti-Christ and is responsible for the existence of evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikatnyte Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Then why all the security alerts?
Are they saying -- as many of us have long suspected -- that these orange-level terrorist alerts are bogus? If we're "safe," they must be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes. Interesting contradiction, isn't it?
"America and the world are safer"
"We are raising the alert status to Orange"
And they say this at the same time!
The monsters are due on Maple street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. 100% Correct
If we're really safer, then they've intercepted the people and foiled the plans. So, there's is NO REASON to elevate the alert status. Safer means safer! It means not having to worry as much, because we're safer! Higher alert status means we should worry MORE!

Thus, one or the other has to be false.

Hmmmm! I wonder which one.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Oh! And, Welcome To DU!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Yeah
Sometimes it amazes me how much it is that Bush supporters can ignore what is obvious to everyone else. There are none so blind as those that will not see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. So, the reversal of the meme is:
when freepers talk about how bush has stopped us from being attacked by terrorists, we should say "point out the terrorists he's had captured. If you can't do that, how do you know there have been any other attacks planned?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. So if there is an attack ala October - they going to recant?
and vote for Kerry?

Save this meme for future reference!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Nah
One of the advantages of being ion God's Own Party is that you are always right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC