Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

are attorney generals usually controversial, or is it just that i've

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UpsideDownFlag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:29 PM
Original message
are attorney generals usually controversial, or is it just that i've
grown up only being aware of Reno and Ashcroft? it seems that they're always hated by about the other side for various reasons (reno=waco, for instance, or Ashcroft= patriot act/TOA). has this always been the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. What;s wrong with Janet Reno?
One person was responsable for the deaths at Waco - DAVID KORESH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpsideDownFlag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i know, my point was....is it just something that comes with the territory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. The systemic problem of religion and law
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 07:16 PM by teryang
Those who accept fundamentalism rather than the Constitution as the basic vantage point for adjudication of the law are the problem. Many of these people regard the Bible and the loose and nebulous system of beliefs they associate with it a more important source of "law" than the Constitution and our our centuries old traditions of common law jurisprudence.

I've met quite a few lawyers in this category. It isn't the law and legal process that should dominate consideration of policy and decision making in the judicial branch, but statements referencing "personal responsibility," "accepting the consequences of one's actions" and "the official policy of the police." These attorneys operate on a superficial level of simplistic beliefs in the ultimate moral authority of......authority. How about assistant AG Dinh, the author of the Patriot Act and Patriot Act II? Is such an attorney upholding his oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States? It was distressing to observe the ABA listening quietly and respectfully during the rantings of this deranged lawyer. It is equally distressing as a government attorney in the federal government to be asked to pray at the office on their knees by their boss or to "witness," or to do any of the other "in group" inscrutable rituals of the not so new holy roller ring knockers of the right. Failure to comply is at the risk of your career.

Well researched, reasoned and authoritative legal authority is reduced to meaningless irrelevance as observed in the Coup 2000 decision of SCOTUS. We see law professors and Appellate Court nominees who advocate the legality of torture and gulag like executive policies. It's all a matter of faith. The problem is the same one that the age of reason and the founding fathers sought to rid us of more than two centuries ago. Religion is cynically manipulated by those who seek power by non-Constitutional means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. When, in the case of Ashcroft, even a dead guy beats him
in an election, and your supremely partisan and stupid President appoints him to a very high office---people with any brains tend to think the guy is just a little toooo blessed. Not to mention Ashcroft is not just any asshole, he is an asshole with power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DivinBreuvage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wilson had an Ashcroftian AG waaay back in the 1910s: A. Mitchell Palmer



"Attorney-General A. Mitchell Palmer.... generalized his own experience into a national emergency. Looking back at the situation a year later, he swelled to his theme: 'Like a prairie-fire, the blaze of revolution was sweeping over every American institution of law and order a year ago. It was eating its way into the homes of the American workman, its sharp tongues of revolutionary heat were licking the altars of churches, leaping into the belfry of the school bell, crawling into the sacred corners of American homes, seeking to replace marriage vows with libertine laws, burning up the foundations of society.'

On New Year's Day 1920, the Attorney-General ordered simultaneous raids on radical centers throughout the country. Palmer's agents captured over 6000 individuals, but only three revolvers and no dynamite at all.... Yet his alarming noises did succeed in spreading a contagion of fear. In Hartford, Connecticut, for example, visitors at the jail inquiring after friends caught in the raid were themselves arrested on the ground that this solicitude was prima facie evidence of Bolshevik affiliation.... At one cabinet meeting, early in 1920, the President, trembling and ghostlike, turned to his Attorney-General. 'Palmer,' he said, 'do not let this country see red.' "

From The Crisis of the Old Order by Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC