|
...were about issues, that would be the platform, the arena for debate, that would be most uncomfortable and disadvantageous for Bush. But if we are going to focus on activity that took place when I was an infant, I say we make sure the threat of massive retaliation is very real. We know full well, according to his own words, what Bush was like in the early 70s. He was a man of low moral character, a coward, a lush, a womanizer. Not a good man, not a nice man. And he's given us little reason to think he's changed since then, because I'm not buying the "Jesus" song and dance. Every evangelical out there knows at least one or two "born-again" frauds that they resent and secretly wish to out. That should be played upon. "Sure George Bush says Jesus is his favorite philosopher, but does a man who brags of discussing "pussy" with dad sound like someone who has taken Jesus words to heart?" We can draw a line, from the young man of decadence and low moral character of the 70s to the bitter fraud of a man today. Does a man who counts someone like Karl Rove, who has, on public record, bragged of grossly USING the concerns of evangelicals to win elections, who will "F*ck them like they've not been f*cked before", does a man who counts one like Rove as his closest advisor sound like someone who is allowing the Holy Spirit to speak thru them?
|