Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Spy Who Isn't A Spy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 10:36 PM
Original message
The Spy Who Isn't A Spy
A theory:

Whoever this Spy is, he really isn't a spy. He works for both boosh and Sharon, and no one else.

htuttle, in post #60 in Pitt's thread:
In this case, the spy, or more accurately a mole, was apparently able to get involved in the policy making itself on Iraq and Iran at the highest levels.


"Involved in the policy making"... How could he be involved in the policy making unless he was well known to the policy makers? Because he was a conduit from Sharon to boosh, via the pentagon, known only by the highest officials.

To the FBI, he was known as someone who was passing info to Israel, but unknown by the FBI as someone sanctioned by Rumsfeld to do just that.

So the FBI was following him and wiretapping him, all the while never knowing that what he was doing he did as part of his pentagon job.

If the FBI checked with CIA, the answer would have been 'Unknown'. Check with Mossad? 'Unknown'. Therefore, to the FBI, he had to have been a spy.

Knowing how the plans for the Iraqi war were laid out (without the CIA's solid support) and, knowing how Israel was keenly interested in getting rid of Saddam Hussien, it makes sense that boosh would need a direct link to Sharon - bypassing both the CIA and Mossad - and Sharon would need a direct link back to boosh, so that the plan could be well coordinated betwixt the two.

All this coordination would have to be done well under the table and this 'spy' was just the guy to do it.

The FBI saw this fellow passing info to other unknowns, unknowns who would be traced back to Israel, and so he became the object of their investigation.

Not really a spy, just a go between of the players who lied their way into invading Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. My thoughts exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. So many smoking guns in Washington that it looks like Najaf...
Hello???????? Media? Hello? Is anybody there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course
If my theory has any weight to it, then boosh has once again subverted democracy and sound government practices in order to launch his illegal invasion.

The go between should be brought up on charges of espionage, and he can then provide the details in a court of law proving that he was doing the work of boosh, thereby opening boosh up to the charges of using his office in an un-democratic way.

From Nightline last night, came claims that the 'spy' was a mid-level employee. Fine, doesn't matter. The idea that he was working for a foreign country is what constitutes the illegality and only a complete examination of the material which he passed to the other side will allow the U.S. to determine if, and what kind of damage was done to our democratic process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "he can then provide the details in a court"
If he/she lives long enuf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. One thing for certain
If the 'spy' was not connected to the highest levels, he would have been scooped up already.

The Oval office must have intervened to keep the guy walking the streets. Hell, if the FBI thought any one of us was passing state secrets we'd be in Gitmo already! The 'spy' has high connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. I suspect this is another "lone nut" spin
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 10:04 AM by Marianne
designed to distance Rumsfeld , Feith and Wolfowitz and the whole OSP in the Pentagon from the scandal. "Mole" indicates a single person working in stealth. But this is not like any of the recent famous spies in the past, such as Robert Hanssen, the Opus Dei mole, who operated like the classic spy of old. ( He was involved in dead drops, secret chalk markings on telephone poles etc.)

As far as I can determine,this person simply transported the stuff over to AIPAC, which in turn handed it over to Israel. Wolfowitz, Feith and a host of others involved with the Pentagon's OSP, have direct and even close ties to Sharon's Israel.That is no secret--it is inconceivable that they were unaware of this activity, and it is plausible that they participated, or at the least, were aware of and approved of this exchange of information.

So I find it hard to accept this an act of a mole, or a "loner" --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. i am saying wolfiwitz
what say you

in his private cheney government. was going to cheney and that is when investigation was halted with the story breaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC