Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many catastrophic successes and miscalculations can we afford?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 10:11 AM
Original message
How many catastrophic successes and miscalculations can we afford?
This is a question the Kerry camp should repeatedly ask?
The problem with George Bush is that he doesn't think things through.
Now he wants to privatize Social Security. But America I ask you, Do you really believe George Bush has thought this through. Or is this just this just another one of his catastrophic miscalculations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the phrase George W. was searching for is "Pyrrhic Victory"
and I also think that the victorious general's comment after this ancient catastrophic success was, "Another victory like that and we are done for."

Ah, here we go:

"A Pyrrhic victory is so called after the Greek king Pyrrhus, who, after suffering heavy losses in defeating the Romans in 279 B.C., said to those sent to congratulate him, 'Another such victory over the Romans and we are undone.'"

Google is our friend,

The Plaid Adder

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well it's probably more than a coincidence
That when it comes to serving his corporate masters, President Bush seldom makes a catastrophic miscalculation.

I suspect President Bush's final plan will allow corporations to elminate pension plans, and encourage workers to give Stock Brockers lots of money and get little in return.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the privatization of social security is
emphatically not a brain fart, nor is it w's idea. I'm also sure they realize the implications of going that route, and see those implications as a good thing.

THis reminds me of a bumper sticker popular amongst my friends for the last year-and-a-half: "War is not the answer".
Well, that depends very much upon what the question is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. He doesn't care
He's never actually needed any kind of insurance.

No matter what happens to him, there is and always will be the families' connections standing by, ready to rescue him.

Social Security is insurance and should remain insurance with everyone of us participating in the risk pool.

The obvious "fix" for the Social Security shortfall to come, is to get our fiscal house in order now. Since BushCo totally blew the Social Security surpluses that we were racking up through the '90s, by giving them to the wealthy, it's only befitting that the wealthy start paying FICA taxes on every penny of income they take in, including income on capital gains and dividends to get us back to where we were 01/19/01.

Incomes over $85K ride scot free on the backs of lower income wage earners, as far as FICA taxes go. It's time to abolish the cap on income over which FICA taxes are not collected.

That's the Social Security reform I want to see front and center. All the other proposed "reforms" are trojan horses aimed at killing Social Security altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. We can't "afford" four more years of Bush Inc.
Glad Senator Clinton used the word "miscalculation"
at least three times yesterday while interviewed
by Russert yesterday.

That should be used a lot by all Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatriotGames Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-30-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. If we get 4 more years of w, we will find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC