Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

tweety just attacked clinton as immoral

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IrishBloodEngHeart Donating Member (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:35 PM
Original message
tweety just attacked clinton as immoral
and has his balanced panel

Scarborough and JC Watts: Conservatives
Him, Andrea Mitchell and one other journalist: moderates.


What a fucking asshole he is. I hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Got a Clinton victim body count, Tweety?
Not one made up by the Kool-Aid drinkers, either.

No?

Thought not.

What a despicable whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tweety has always had a thing about Clinton.
But last I checked, Clinton wasn't running for president this year. Get over it, Tweety, you blithering dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is Bill Clinton running?
That's news to me.

Tweety beats another dead horse. Yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrthin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's face it,
Tweey just wants to get laid. He's never been properly laid. Were he to get laid, his voice would no longer be stuck in his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. We should hook him up
Edited on Tue Aug-31-04 08:29 PM by walldude
with Coulter or Malkin.. they'd be perfect for each other..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tweety + kool-aid = insufferable, Type-A asshole.
I can't even stand to listen to that motor-mouthing jerk. He literally gives me a headache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Scarborough's observation
Said that Kerry lost the election in the very minute he said, If I knew then what I know now, I'd still vote for the war. I tend to agree with that puke Scab borough, that it was a huge mistake...I just don't think the election is lost yet.

Never thought I would hear Andrea Mitchell being the voice of reason and calling Tweety and Joe on the wild things they are saying against the Dems/Kerry, but she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So, like Bush just lost the election

because he said "we can't win it... the war on terror".

Candidates will say some unscripted things. They always do.
Which campaign is better at making the candidate look like a
fool for saying them is the one that wins.

Shrubya is famous for sticking his foot in his mouth. Hopefully
the Kerry campaign can make him choke on it.

It's a long ways to election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWolper Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Guess I'm old-fashioned
While I admire President Clinton and his record as president, I see no problem with calling his "actions" in the oval office "immoral."

Giving/receiving oral sex in the oval office with a girl thirty years younger, while you are married, is immoral by almost any definition. I will defend his presidential record to anyone. I cannot defend his personal morality. I've noticed that maybe I am a bit too old-fashioned for this message board, but we all grow up with the morals of our respective generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Clinton showed poor judgment.

BUT, nothing he did deserved what happened to him over it.

MANY presidents, including some of the most admired in history,
have had private sexual affairs. Not just Kennedy either. And
certainly not just Democrats. Clinton was the only one roasted
for it.

As for his morality, that's between Bill, Hillary and his God (if
he has one). I won't judge him for that. And by the way, what's
wrong with two people of different ages having sex. Have you
read much of the Christian bible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. You mean JC Watts--father of a child born out of wedlock? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. And Tweety is fat
There were even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slojim240 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-31-04 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. 977 dead US soldiers for lies and PNAC is not immoral?
I'd rather everyone in Congress got a blow job than to send off 977 of our children to die in an immoral, illegal, and unnecessary war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC