Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

August-----" U.S. Troops in Iraq See Highest Injury Toll Yet"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 10:26 AM
Original message
August-----" U.S. Troops in Iraq See Highest Injury Toll Yet"
U.S. Troops in Iraq See Highest Injury Toll Yet
By Karl Vick
Washington Post

Sunday 05 September 2004

BAGHDAD, Sept. 4 -- About 1,100 U.S. soldiers and Marines were wounded in Iraq during August, by far the highest combat injury toll for any month since the war began and an indication of the intensity of battles flaring in urban areas.

U.S. medical commanders say the sharp rise in battlefield injuries reflects more than three weeks of fighting by two Army and one Marine battalion in the southern city of Najaf. At the same time, U.S. units frequently faced combat in a sprawling Shiite Muslim slum in Baghdad and in the Sunni cities of Fallujah, Ramadi and Samarra, all of which remain under the control of insurgents two months after the transfer of political authority.

"They were doing battlefield urban operations in four places at one time," said Lt. Col. Albert Maas, operations officer for the 2nd Medical Brigade, which oversees U.S. combat hospitals in Iraq. "It's like working in downtown Detroit. You're going literally building to building."
-----------------------snip---------------

<http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/090604Y.shtml>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it means - "We have them on the run"
thats what I heard. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Memo -- they don't want us there
ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Right. We're so enormously popular,
that we're fighting to stay alive. Harsh experience has shown, time and time again, that if you do not have the support of the local population, you will not succeed. VietNam proved that.

The US, with all its sophistication and military hardware, could not fight against small, armed units called guerrillas. They would vanish into the population because that was their harbor. The local population would just stand there with a blank look on their faces, and shake their heads, "we don't know?". We lost that war. We had to admit defeat and go home.

"But this is different!", Rumsfeld would say to me. This is MUCH more important than VietNam ever was. The outcome of our oil-soaked society is at stake. We NEED that oil. So does the rest of Europe, he would continue. So this is a war that we must win, at all costs.

We certainly do try! The outcome will most probably be the same as IndoChina, however, because we are strangers in a strange land. We're the visiting team, and we're bound to lose.

If by some fluke chance we were to succeed in suppressing the population, they will take it out of us in the form of enormous, draining costs which will kill us anyway.

Colin Powell said to Bush, "you take over that country, and it's going to be yours. You'll own it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And bu$h said,
"Yee-haw! I git to own mah own country! Talk about yer ownership society!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC