Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe drugs aren't such a great issue to bring up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:33 PM
Original message
Maybe drugs aren't such a great issue to bring up
I am Kerry's age and we all did something. The soldiers in Viet Nam did a lot of really high grade grass. And at home we were prone to believe in sex, drugs and rock n roll. My guess is that Kerry probably was into some stuff like that, too - especially if he was part of the peace movement.

You have to have been there to understand. The grass we did was not nearly as powerful as the stuff out there today. We did a little of this and a little of that. mRooms and cilicibin and acid. Not all of the time - but sometimes on the weekend. But coke was off limits - and so was heroin. Coke was way too expensive for most of us to buy. And heroin was way too dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Umm..and you brought this up..
because...

:shrug:

I don't get it. I bet Shrub did more drugs than everyone on DU combined..lol.


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. "WE" aren't bringing up the drugs
and cocaine...Kitty Kelly is in her new book. "WE" aren't responsible for what she has researched and found out for her book that she started before Bush became president. "WE" aren't responsible for publishing her book. I believe Doubleday is.

The worst "WE" can do is talk about her book and what is in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree that there are some places that we shouldn't go.
But let them have their fun! It's only DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Smoking a little pot
is a lot different than having a coke habit and then a serious problem with alcoholism. Especially when you are the head of the party that is for zero tolerance and mandatory drug sentences.

I say bring 'em on.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Weed is not more powerful today...
However, it is easier to find high quality stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. If it becomes a big issue
Kerry might get caught in the crossfire.

What if he did cocaine.

I have no problem with people using pot - I love the stuff. But I wouldn't want 60 minutes sticking a microphone in my face and asking me about it 30 year's later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:49 PM
Original message
but why repeat untruthful myths from the pro-WOD crowd? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Chimp was
a cokehead and that was hard stuff for that time period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well, ya
I don't remember that many people who even used coke. It was just off limits. But, like I said, it was too expensive for us to buy. But the rich kids might have been into it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. I doubt money was an object for young George.
Or maybe he just got it straight of the CIA flights
coming in to the air force bases for pappy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. The difference is Kerry and Edwards have nothing to hide:
Sens. John Kerry and John Edwards both have admitted publicly to using marijuana as younger men. Mr. Bush — a product of the same generation — refuses to say whether he has.

http://www.cannabis.net/presidentialpot.html

As opposed to Bush, who seems to be LYING about his coke-soaked past.

It's not the coke snorting(smoking?),(injecting?)- it's the dishonesty about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ahh the old "The grass we did was not nearly as powerful" canard.
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 05:43 PM by ezmojason
That is a very effective meme for allowing people who
have tried it and know it to be basically safe to find
a new mental space as moralistic crusaders against the
young and justify an outrageous police state to enforce
these new found values.

Baby boomers the narcissistic and hypocritical generation.

Gotta love them. NOT.

At least when they spout this crap.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Well, excuse me!
I'm only saying what has been my experience. What we smoked didn't send you into a coma. Some of the stuff I have tried in the last few years is so potent it's just not any fun anymore.

What I liked the best about pot was that we would get stoned and then laugh until we were sick. It was really fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Maybe your resistance has dropped or...
you only got ditch weed back in the day.

Now you get the killer green and assume that it wasn't
what the better connected had back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. It wasn't ditch weed
It came in from California. I know. My old man was the biggest dealer in Salt Lake.

I tried to dry out ditch weed and smoke it - you would have lung cancer long before you ever got high on that stuff. We have it growing wild all over the place here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I lean towards...
your resistance dropping then.

I avoid it because I work non-stop cleaning the house and
then end up working way to late on work projects.

Kinda the opposite of a comma or a mello time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luaneryder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Maybe you were getting ripped off back then
I'm 51 and can vaguely remember being very close to comatose after three tokes on a hash pipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It's kind of a self-defeating argument....
The grass is more powerful today means you don't have to sit around inhale so much smoke into your lungs as they used to have to. Since the problem is not that someone is going to OD on pot, then the only real problem is idea of SMOKING something causing lung damage and if you have SMOKE LESS, then that's a good thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I have no scientific facts here
But I can't see the point in being stoned if you can't think or move.

And there is no way I could stop after smoking just little bit. I don't have that kind of control.

I just love to be stoned. So I don't keep it around the house at all because I would never make it to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. then you just have an addictive personality
many many people smoke (daily even) and manage to make it to work every day. sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. I don't know about you, but I never smoke a whole joint
I smoked too much a couple times and had a scary hash crispie experience, but that's not what I prefer or have generally done when smoking pot. If you can get high off 1 or 2 hits as opposed to a whole joint, why is that a bad thing? If you drink alcohol, you don't drink as much hard liquor as beer, do you? It's sort of the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Don't forget

the fallback position. He's born again and all is forgiven...

However, Kitty Kelly is going to be EVERYWHERE. She is a proven self promoter and her face will be on TV around the clock. The buzz will be huge. Even snake handling congregations in the backwoods will hear about it. The stink will be enormous. So stinky that it will permeate far and wide. Some may not be quite so forgiving.

The 'haves' base of the repug party won't give a damn and probably won't be all that surprised, but there could be problems with that other base.

They'll try hard to tie Kitty Kelly to the Kerry campaign, but that dog, as they say, won't hunt.

Let the games begin!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. You might read number 5 from arcos above.
This might explain certain baby boomers' understanding of the issue.

Scarcity of good quality stuff, could possibly, if one was open minded, explain why some people think that marijuana in those days was of lower grade -- good grass was simply harder to find.

And, yes, in the hands of some this a canard, but in the hands of others it just means that they couldn't get good stuff in earlier days... Or weren't prepared to pay for it.

Of course I would never endorse any illegal activity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Drugs users for truth
I am for truth. Cannabis should be legal. Nobody should be
in prison for taking the drugs they wanted to take... it is freedom
of speech and the pursuit of happiness.

Big brother has no business in a private person's drugs use. Perhaps
bringing up a mass murder charge, a war crimes tribunal and a crimes
against humanity indictment against fratboy is more appropos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keirsey Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. the point is

Dubya lied about his cocaine use.

His whole life is a lie.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Rednecks aren't going to see the difference
To them, if their hero the war president did some drugs and drank some beer it won't be any different than Kerry smoking some joints.

And the next thing we know there will be an ad come out about kerry being a total drug freak (it doesn't need to be true, you know) and is therefore unfit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. and? He's been the fikkig president for 4 years.... for peets sake
Why not charge him with his bloody record... really bloody!

4 years of policy for what?... a surplus to bankruptcy,
peace to wars and 10's of thousands dead,
unemployment risen, jobs lost, healthcare sadly weak,
etc...etc... etc...

words and past deeds are one thing... their lies are already
spoken as facts on the ground... that they refuse to accept or
acknowledge.

His whole life is a lie... and the only part we need bother with
is the part where he fucked the whole american public, 280,000,000
peole out of a decent future for the USA. That treasonous little
fuck should rot in prison for his days.... and certainly not see
anything near public office until he dies.

Yes, his whole life is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. The people who support him don't care if it is all a lie
That's the part I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. swing voters, doooo care
We bring up his record, to return him to his responsibility for

"destroying value" - this is the boardroom term, the ultimate slander
of a CEO. We must remind those who's hearts are not completely
rotted out, that a leader is responsible for 'is ship, and that
this leader has run us aground.

We're not selling the hardcore... we're selling the battleground
states, the swing voters and the undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. I will not knock any issue bought up this season
If it's an issue important to someone they should bring it up, drug useres have a platform also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Isn't that the Green Party Platform?
N/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. No thats my platform!
I don't do drugs, I have never done drugs. But if there are people out there that want to change the laws I'm not going to stop them. Being a Gay man I have my own issues to fight & I won't stand in the way of anyone that wants to affect change. I believe thats their given right as an American!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Well, there are probably some things that should be
against the law. Like owning guns - at least AK47's.

These guys want all of their stuff to be legal and all of our stuff to be illegal. That is so no right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Your barking up the wrong tree here with me
I am a big 2nd amendment supporter! Although I draw the line with assault weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. We're not Kitty Kelley. We didn't bring it up. "Some people" did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. "We" didn't bring up the drugs.
Kitty Kelley apparently will--in a book she announced just after Bush took office. She's not connected to Kerry or the Democratic party or DU.

I was "there", too. There was excellent pot available back then--you just didn't know the right people. And there's still plenty of regular Mexican stuff sold nowadays; prices have gone up, but that's inflation for you!

It's true that coke wasn't well known in the eary 70's. It was mentioned in old blues songs but only really known to the rich until later in the decade. It wasn't "off limits". Unfortunately, neither was heroin. And let's not forget methamphetamines!

Drugs have always been with us & always will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC