Why there will another major terrorist attack before the election...unless

[Ugnmoose]

I don't care what the b.s. poll numbers say. The Bushco know that they are in deep trouble and are not going to win this election without something drastic happening to prop them up. As John Dean pointed out in his book "Worse Than Watergate", the neoncons know that if they get voted out that they are likely to be indicted for war crimes and treason. The only thing that can maintain their coup is another terrorist attack. Even pollster John Zogby said his polling shows that such an attack would help Bush's numbers. There you have it. I rest my case.

It is for this reason that the anti-neocons (legitimiate CIA and State and Defense Dept officials) must expose the Bushco scandals ASAP. Only then can we hope to diffuse the possiblity of such an attack. It's them or us. Let's hope we prevail or God Help Us All!


http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/09/296728.shtml

<snip>

America is at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in its history. An Al Qaeda sponsored terrorist attack is being contemplated as a "trigger mechanism" for carrying out a coup d'etat.

Supported by a barrage of media propaganda, these repeated terror alerts have created an environment of fear and intimidation, a wait-and-accept attitude, a false normality. US citizensare led to believe that a military solution is required to protect democracy. In other words, the possibility of an impending attack on America by this "outside enemy" has been accepted by the American public; this tacit acceptance has set the stage for the adoption of "the highest threat level": code red alert. What the US public is not aware of, is that a code red alert suspends civilian government; it triggers a whole series of emergency procedures; it is tantamount to a coup d'etat -- although in many regards the coup d'etat has already taken place under the post-9/11 anti-terrorist legislation and the rigging of the 2000 elections which brought George W. Bush intothe White House.

[acmavm]

1. Then the dems need to point out that if there's another attack while

bush*, rummy, cheney, & Co. are running things, we need to get the incompetents out, and fast.

[Deja Q]

2. DUers have pointed out lots of things the Dems in office should do.

Hasn't caused the Dems from doing them, unfortunately...

[wrang_wrang]

3. How hard would it be for the CIA, RNC, or some "rogue operative"

to send anthrax-laced letters to the representatives of the "liberal" national media and Democratic senators (oh yeah they already did that!) or blow up a bomb (at some "less than crucial" place like the Statue of Liberty, Washington Monument, one of Donald Trump's bankrupt casinos, a bridge over the Missouri river, or a Burger King in a black neighborhood of Kansas City), blame it on al-Qaeda terrorists, declare martial law, cancel the elections, and crown King George permanent president for the duration of the War on Terror?

[lastknowngood]

4. If an attack happens in say L.A. then Cali. will go to the shrub

game over man.

[Disturbed]

5. A "fake" terrorist attack?

An attack planned and executed by our own Govt.? Who would carry out such an attack? Isn't the CIA rank and file totally pissed off about the V. Plame outing and being scapegoated about faulty intell that actually came out of OSP, Cheney & Rumsfailed, little Gestapo outfit?
Would BushCo hire mercenaries that would suicide themselves in lue of their families recieving payment?

I'd like to read an explanation on who would carry out such an attack and what it would consist of. Create the scenerio, please.

[Ugnmoose]

6. The same people who carried out 9-11

I think Mr. Cheney knows how to take care of this.