Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

42% of the callers on the CNN poll thought combat deaths in Iraq were low.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:06 PM
Original message
42% of the callers on the CNN poll thought combat deaths in Iraq were low.
These people should immediately sign up for combat duty and shut the fuck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jumpstart33 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Or send their children.
At least 10,000 votes should be against Bush. 1000 X 10 for at least ten family memebers of each one of the dead voting against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas.45 Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are misrepresenting the poll
The poll actually asked whether the deaths were higher or lower than YOU EXPECTED. Big difference, these people just said they were lower than what they expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I am not sure
what are we supposed to expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas.45 Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not sure, it just asked whether it was more
or less than you expected. I personally expected more. Urban combat usually leads to high casulty rates. Look at Somalia as the best current example. 18 dead US Rangers, dozens more wounded, and around 5,000 dead Somalians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But...we weren't supposed to HAVE urban combat, remember?
We were supposed to take out their "elite Republican Guard" (remember them???), and then they would welcome the liberators with open arms!

Didn't quite work out that way, now did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrocks Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. bullet proof vests kept fatalities down
but massive brain injuries are much higher than docs expected-saw an msnbc show on it-the brain trauma and amputees-its why we had 1,100 wounded in August-3 out of 4 were intensive care patients-battlefield medicine has gotten better but still can't replace the human brain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. One death is one death too many
for the families involved.

I hate it when I hear "They are defending our freedom." No, they aren't. To the chimp, Cheney, and the PNACers, they are warm bodies sent to conquer and occupy a sovereign nation - no matter what the cost to the Iraqi people or the U.S. military. No soldier has died in Iraq defending the freedom of Americans. They have died for greed, Halliburton profits, and American imperialism. Plenty of blood on Bushco's hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Combat deaths in Iraq were low."
Edited on Tue Sep-07-04 06:43 PM by Dangerman
WAH? One more reason why more Americans trust Crap News Network than any other cable news outlet, FAUX NEWS aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC